Single-molecule tracking in live cells reveals distinct target-search strategies of transcription factors in the nucleus

  1. Ignacio Izeddin
  2. Vincent Récamier
  3. Lana Bosanac
  4. Ibrahim I Cisse
  5. Lydia Boudarene
  6. Claire Dugast-Darzacq
  7. Florence Proux
  8. Olivier Bénichou
  9. Raphaël Voituriez
  10. Olivier Bensaude
  11. Maxime Dahan
  12. Xavier Darzacq  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, France
  2. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France
  3. Institut Curie, CNRS UMR168, France

Abstract

Gene regulation relies on transcription factors (TFs) exploring the nucleus searching their targets. So far, most studies have focused on how fast TFs diffuse, underestimating the role of nuclear architecture. We implemented a single-molecule tracking assay to determine TFs dynamics. We found that c-Myc is a global explorer of the nucleus. In contrast, the positive transcription elongation factor P-TEFb is a local explorer that oversamples its environment. Consequently, each c-Myc molecule is equally available for all nuclear sites while P-TEFb reaches its targets in a position-dependent manner. Our observations are consistent with a model in which the exploration geometry of TFs is restrained by their interactions with nuclear structures and not by exclusion. The geometry-controlled kinetics of TFs target-search illustrates the influence of nuclear architecture on gene regulation, and has strong implications on how proteins react in the nucleus and how their function can be regulated in space and time.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ignacio Izeddin

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Vincent Récamier

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lana Bosanac

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ibrahim I Cisse

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Lydia Boudarene

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Claire Dugast-Darzacq

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Florence Proux

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Olivier Bénichou

    Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Raphaël Voituriez

    Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Olivier Bensaude

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Maxime Dahan

    Institut Curie, CNRS UMR168, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Xavier Darzacq

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    darzacq@ens.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Robert H Singer, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States

Version history

  1. Received: January 7, 2014
  2. Accepted: June 11, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 12, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 15, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Izeddin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,921
    views
  • 1,438
    downloads
  • 267
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ignacio Izeddin
  2. Vincent Récamier
  3. Lana Bosanac
  4. Ibrahim I Cisse
  5. Lydia Boudarene
  6. Claire Dugast-Darzacq
  7. Florence Proux
  8. Olivier Bénichou
  9. Raphaël Voituriez
  10. Olivier Bensaude
  11. Maxime Dahan
  12. Xavier Darzacq
(2014)
Single-molecule tracking in live cells reveals distinct target-search strategies of transcription factors in the nucleus
eLife 3:e02230.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02230

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02230

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Xiao-Ru Chen, Karuna Dixit ... Tatyana I Igumenova
    Research Article

    Regulated hydrolysis of the phosphoinositide phosphatidylinositol(4,5)-bis-phosphate to diacylglycerol and inositol-1,4,5-P3 defines a major eukaryotic pathway for translation of extracellular cues to intracellular signaling circuits. Members of the lipid-activated protein kinase C isoenzyme family (PKCs) play central roles in this signaling circuit. One of the regulatory mechanisms employed to downregulate stimulated PKC activity is via a proteasome-dependent degradation pathway that is potentiated by peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1. Here, we show that contrary to prevailing models, Pin1 does not regulate conventional PKC isoforms α and βII via a canonical cis-trans isomerization of the peptidyl-prolyl bond. Rather, Pin1 acts as a PKC binding partner that controls PKC activity via sequestration of the C-terminal tail of the kinase. The high-resolution structure of full-length Pin1 complexed to the C-terminal tail of PKCβII reveals that a novel bivalent interaction mode underlies the non-catalytic mode of Pin1 action. Specifically, Pin1 adopts a conformation in which it uses the WW and PPIase domains to engage two conserved phosphorylated PKC motifs, the turn motif and hydrophobic motif, respectively. Hydrophobic motif is a non-canonical Pin1-interacting element. The structural information combined with the results of extensive binding studies and experiments in cultured cells suggest that non-catalytic mechanisms represent unappreciated modes of Pin1-mediated regulation of AGC kinases and other key enzymes/substrates.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Christian Galicia, Giambattista Guaitoli ... Wim Versées
    Research Article

    Roco proteins entered the limelight after mutations in human LRRK2 were identified as a major cause of familial Parkinson’s disease. LRRK2 is a large and complex protein combining a GTPase and protein kinase activity, and disease mutations increase the kinase activity, while presumably decreasing the GTPase activity. Although a cross-communication between both catalytic activities has been suggested, the underlying mechanisms and the regulatory role of the GTPase domain remain unknown. Several structures of LRRK2 have been reported, but structures of Roco proteins in their activated GTP-bound state are lacking. Here, we use single-particle cryo-electron microscopy to solve the structure of a bacterial Roco protein (CtRoco) in its GTP-bound state, aided by two conformation-specific nanobodies: NbRoco1 and NbRoco2. This structure presents CtRoco in an active monomeric state, featuring a very large GTP-induced conformational change using the LRR-Roc linker as a hinge. Furthermore, this structure shows how NbRoco1 and NbRoco2 collaborate to activate CtRoco in an allosteric way. Altogether, our data provide important new insights into the activation mechanism of Roco proteins, with relevance to LRRK2 regulation, and suggest new routes for the allosteric modulation of their GTPase activity.