Transport of soluble proteins through the Golgi occurs by diffusion via continuities across cisternae

  1. Galina V Beznoussenko
  2. Seetharaman Parashuraman
  3. Riccardo Rizzo
  4. Roman Polishchuk
  5. Oliviano Martella
  6. Daniele Di Giandomenico
  7. Aurora Fusella
  8. Alexander Spaar
  9. Michele Sallese
  10. Maria Grazia Capestrano
  11. Margit Pavelka
  12. Matthijn R Vos
  13. Yuri GM Rikers
  14. Volkhard Helms
  15. Alexandre A Mironov
  16. Alberto Luini  Is a corresponding author
  1. Fondazione IFOM, Italy
  2. Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR-IBP), Italy
  3. Telethon Institute for Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), Italy
  4. Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Italy
  5. Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  6. FEI Company, Netherlands
  7. Saarland University, Germany

Abstract

The mechanism of transport through the Golgi complex is not completely understood, insofar as no single transport mechanism appears to account for all of the observations. Here, we compare the transport of soluble secretory proteins (albumin and α1-antitrypsin) with that of supramolecular cargoes (e.g., procollagen) that are proposed to traverse the Golgi by compartment progression-maturation. We show that these soluble proteins traverse the Golgi much faster than procollagen while moving through the same stack. Moreover, we present kinetic and morphological observations that indicate that albumin transport occurs by diffusion via intercisternal continuities. These data provide evidence that this transport mechanism that applies to a major class of secretory proteins and indicate the co-existence of multiple intra-Golgi trafficking modes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Galina V Beznoussenko

    Fondazione IFOM, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Seetharaman Parashuraman

    Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR-IBP), Naples, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Riccardo Rizzo

    Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR-IBP), Naples, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Roman Polishchuk

    Telethon Institute for Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), Naples, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Oliviano Martella

    Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Daniele Di Giandomenico

    Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Aurora Fusella

    Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Alexander Spaar

    Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Michele Sallese

    Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Maria Grazia Capestrano

    Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Margit Pavelka

    Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Matthijn R Vos

    FEI Company, Eindhoven, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Yuri GM Rikers

    FEI Company, Eindhoven, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Volkhard Helms

    Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Alexandre A Mironov

    Fondazione IFOM, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Alberto Luini

    Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR-IBP), Naples, Italy
    For correspondence
    luini@tigem.it
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Suzanne R Pfeffer, Stanford University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: December 4, 2013
  2. Accepted: May 25, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 27, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 25, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Beznoussenko et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,778
    views
  • 537
    downloads
  • 69
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Galina V Beznoussenko
  2. Seetharaman Parashuraman
  3. Riccardo Rizzo
  4. Roman Polishchuk
  5. Oliviano Martella
  6. Daniele Di Giandomenico
  7. Aurora Fusella
  8. Alexander Spaar
  9. Michele Sallese
  10. Maria Grazia Capestrano
  11. Margit Pavelka
  12. Matthijn R Vos
  13. Yuri GM Rikers
  14. Volkhard Helms
  15. Alexandre A Mironov
  16. Alberto Luini
(2014)
Transport of soluble proteins through the Golgi occurs by diffusion via continuities across cisternae
eLife 3:e02009.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02009

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02009

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Christopher TA Lewis, Elise G Melhedegaard ... Julien Ochala
    Research Article

    Hibernation is a period of metabolic suppression utilized by many small and large mammal species to survive during winter periods. As the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms remain incompletely understood, our study aimed to determine whether skeletal muscle myosin and its metabolic efficiency undergo alterations during hibernation to optimize energy utilization. We isolated muscle fibers from small hibernators, Ictidomys tridecemlineatus and Eliomys quercinus and larger hibernators, Ursus arctos and Ursus americanus. We then conducted loaded Mant-ATP chase experiments alongside X-ray diffraction to measure resting myosin dynamics and its ATP demand. In parallel, we performed multiple proteomics analyses. Our results showed a preservation of myosin structure in U. arctos and U. americanus during hibernation, whilst in I. tridecemlineatus and E. quercinus, changes in myosin metabolic states during torpor unexpectedly led to higher levels in energy expenditure of type II, fast-twitch muscle fibers at ambient lab temperatures (20 °C). Upon repeating loaded Mant-ATP chase experiments at 8 °C (near the body temperature of torpid animals), we found that myosin ATP consumption in type II muscle fibers was reduced by 77–107% during torpor compared to active periods. Additionally, we observed Myh2 hyper-phosphorylation during torpor in I. tridecemilineatus, which was predicted to stabilize the myosin molecule. This may act as a potential molecular mechanism mitigating myosin-associated increases in skeletal muscle energy expenditure during periods of torpor in response to cold exposure. Altogether, we demonstrate that resting myosin is altered in hibernating mammals, contributing to significant changes to the ATP consumption of skeletal muscle. Additionally, we observe that it is further altered in response to cold exposure and highlight myosin as a potentially contributor to skeletal muscle non-shivering thermogenesis.

    1. Cell Biology
    Jun Yang, Shitian Zou ... Xiaochun Bai
    Research Article

    Quiescence (G0) maintenance and exit are crucial for tissue homeostasis and regeneration in mammals. Here, we show that methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (Mecp2) expression is cell cycle-dependent and negatively regulates quiescence exit in cultured cells and in an injury-induced liver regeneration mouse model. Specifically, acute reduction of Mecp2 is required for efficient quiescence exit as deletion of Mecp2 accelerates, while overexpression of Mecp2 delays quiescence exit, and forced expression of Mecp2 after Mecp2 conditional knockout rescues cell cycle reentry. The E3 ligase Nedd4 mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of Mecp2, and thus facilitates quiescence exit. A genome-wide study uncovered the dual role of Mecp2 in preventing quiescence exit by transcriptionally activating metabolic genes while repressing proliferation-associated genes. Particularly disruption of two nuclear receptors, Rara or Nr1h3, accelerates quiescence exit, mimicking the Mecp2 depletion phenotype. Our studies unravel a previously unrecognized role for Mecp2 as an essential regulator of quiescence exit and tissue regeneration.