Oxidation of cellular amino acid pools leads to cytotoxic mistranslation of the genetic code

  1. Tammy Bullwinkle
  2. Noah M Reynolds
  3. Medha Raina
  4. Adil B Moghal
  5. Eleftheria Matsa
  6. Andrei Rajkovic
  7. Huseyin Kayadibi
  8. Farbod Fazlollahi
  9. Christopher Ryan
  10. Nathaniel Howitz
  11. Kym F Faull
  12. Beth Lazazzera
  13. Michael Ibba  Is a corresponding author
  1. Ohio State University, United States
  2. Adana Military Hospital, Turkey
  3. Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  4. California Department of Toxic Substances Control, United States
  5. University of California, Los Angeles, United States

Abstract

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases use a variety of mechanisms to ensure fidelity of the genetic code and ultimately select the correct amino acids to be used in protein synthesis. The physiological necessity of these quality control mechanisms in different environments remains unclear, as the cost versus benefit of accurate protein synthesis is difficult to predict. We show that in Escherichia coli, a non-coded amino acid produced through oxidative damage is a significant threat to the accuracy of protein synthesis and must be cleared by phenylalanine-tRNA synthetase in order to prevent cellular toxicity caused by mis-synthesized proteins. These findings demonstrate how stress can lead to the accumulation of non-canonical amino acids that must be excluded from the proteome in order to maintain cellular viability.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tammy Bullwinkle

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Noah M Reynolds

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Medha Raina

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Adil B Moghal

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Eleftheria Matsa

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andrei Rajkovic

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Huseyin Kayadibi

    Adana Military Hospital, Adana, Turkey
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Farbod Fazlollahi

    Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Christopher Ryan

    California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Nathaniel Howitz

    University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Kym F Faull

    Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Beth Lazazzera

    University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Michael Ibba

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    For correspondence
    ibba.1@att.net
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Gisela Storz, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, United States

Version history

  1. Received: February 10, 2014
  2. Accepted: May 29, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 2, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 24, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Bullwinkle et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,797
    views
  • 287
    downloads
  • 68
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tammy Bullwinkle
  2. Noah M Reynolds
  3. Medha Raina
  4. Adil B Moghal
  5. Eleftheria Matsa
  6. Andrei Rajkovic
  7. Huseyin Kayadibi
  8. Farbod Fazlollahi
  9. Christopher Ryan
  10. Nathaniel Howitz
  11. Kym F Faull
  12. Beth Lazazzera
  13. Michael Ibba
(2014)
Oxidation of cellular amino acid pools leads to cytotoxic mistranslation of the genetic code
eLife 3:e02501.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02501

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02501

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.