Abstract

In yeast, many tandemly arranged genes show peak expression in different phases of the metabolic cycle (YMC) or in different carbon sources, indicative of regulation by a bi-modal switch, but it is not clear how these switches are controlled. Using native elongating transcript analysis (NET-seq), we show that transcription itself is a component of bi-modal switches, facilitating reciprocal expression in gene clusters. HMS2, encoding a growth-regulated transcription factor, switches between sense- or antisense-dominant states that also coordinate up- and down-regulation of transcription at neighbouring genes. Engineering HMS2 reveals alternative mono-, di- or tri-cistronic and antisense transcription units (TUs), using different promoter and terminator combinations, that underlie state-switching. Promoters or terminators are excluded from functional TUs by read-through transcriptional interference, while antisense TUs insulate downstream genes from interference. We propose that the balance of transcriptional insulation and interference at gene clusters facilitates gene expression switches during intracellular and extracellular environmental change.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tania Nguyen

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Harry Fischl

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Françoise S Howe

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Ronja Woloszczuk

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Ana Serra Barros

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Zhenyu Xu

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. David Brown

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Struan C Murray

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Simon Haenni

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. James M Halstead

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Leigh O'Connor

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Gergana Shipkovenska

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Lars M Steinmeetz

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Jane Mellor

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    jane.mellor@bioch.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    Jane Mellor, I am an advisor to Oxford Biodynamics Ltd and Sibelius Ltd and sit on the board of Chronos Therapeutics. OBD provided funding for this work but like all the funders, had no say in the design or outcome of the research and do not benefit in any way from this research.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Joaquin M Espinosa, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Colorado, United States

Version history

  1. Received: June 8, 2014
  2. Accepted: November 17, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 19, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 24, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Nguyen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,974
    views
  • 398
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tania Nguyen
  2. Harry Fischl
  3. Françoise S Howe
  4. Ronja Woloszczuk
  5. Ana Serra Barros
  6. Zhenyu Xu
  7. David Brown
  8. Struan C Murray
  9. Simon Haenni
  10. James M Halstead
  11. Leigh O'Connor
  12. Gergana Shipkovenska
  13. Lars M Steinmeetz
  14. Jane Mellor
(2014)
Transcription mediated insulation and interference direct gene cluster expression switches
eLife 3:e03635.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03635

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03635

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Maksim Kleverov, Daria Zenkova ... Alexey A Sergushichev
    Research Article

    Transcriptomic profiling became a standard approach to quantify a cell state, which led to accumulation of huge amount of public gene expression datasets. However, both reuse of these datasets or analysis of newly generated ones requires significant technical expertise. Here we present Phantasus - a user-friendly web-application for interactive gene expression analysis which provides a streamlined access to more than 96000 public gene expression datasets, as well as allows analysis of user-uploaded datasets. Phantasus integrates an intuitive and highly interactive JavaScript-based heatmap interface with an ability to run sophisticated R-based analysis methods. Overall Phantasus allows users to go all the way from loading, normalizing and filtering data to doing differential gene expression and downstream analysis. Phantasus can be accessed on-line at https://alserglab.wustl.edu/phantasus or can be installed locally from Bioconductor (https://bioconductor.org/packages/phantasus). Phantasus source code is available at https://github.com/ctlab/phantasus under MIT license.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Ryan T Bell, Harutyun Sahakyan ... Eugene V Koonin
    Research Article

    A comprehensive census of McrBC systems, among the most common forms of prokaryotic Type IV restriction systems, followed by phylogenetic analysis, reveals their enormous abundance in diverse prokaryotes and a plethora of genomic associations. We focus on a previously uncharacterized branch, which we denote coiled-coil nuclease tandems (CoCoNuTs) for their salient features: the presence of extensive coiled-coil structures and tandem nucleases. The CoCoNuTs alone show extraordinary variety, with three distinct types and multiple subtypes. All CoCoNuTs contain domains predicted to interact with translation system components, such as OB-folds resembling the SmpB protein that binds bacterial transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), YTH-like domains that might recognize methylated tmRNA, tRNA, or rRNA, and RNA-binding Hsp70 chaperone homologs, along with RNases, such as HEPN domains, all suggesting that the CoCoNuTs target RNA. Many CoCoNuTs might additionally target DNA, via McrC nuclease homologs. Additional restriction systems, such as Type I RM, BREX, and Druantia Type III, are frequently encoded in the same predicted superoperons. In many of these superoperons, CoCoNuTs are likely regulated by cyclic nucleotides, possibly, RNA fragments with cyclic termini, that bind associated CARF (CRISPR-Associated Rossmann Fold) domains. We hypothesize that the CoCoNuTs, together with the ancillary restriction factors, employ an echeloned defense strategy analogous to that of Type III CRISPR-Cas systems, in which an immune response eliminating virus DNA and/or RNA is launched first, but then, if it fails, an abortive infection response leading to PCD/dormancy via host RNA cleavage takes over.