A structural mechanism for bacterial autotransporter glycosylation by a dodecameric heptosyltransferase family

  1. Qing Yao
  2. Qiuhe Lu
  3. Xiaobo Wan
  4. Feng Song
  5. Yue Xu
  6. Mo Hu
  7. Alla Zamyatina
  8. Xiaoyun Liu
  9. Niu Huang
  10. Ping Zhu
  11. Feng Shao  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Institute of Biological Sciences, China
  2. Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  3. Peking University, China
  4. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Austria

Abstract

A large group of bacterial virulence autotransporters including AIDA-I from diffusely adhering E. coli (DAEC) and TibA from enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) require hyper-glycosylation for functioning. Here we demonstrate that TibC from ETEC harbors a heptosyltransferase activity on TibA and AIDA-I, defining a large family of bacterial autotransporter heptosyltransferases (BAHTs). Crystal structure of TibC reveals a characteristic ring-shape dodecamer. The protomer features an N-terminal β-barrel, a catalytic domain, a β-hairpin thumb and a unique iron-finger motif. The iron-finger motif contributes to back-to-back dimerization; six dimers form the ring through β-hairpin thumb-mediated hand-in-hand contact. Structure of ADP-D, D-heptose-bound TibC reveals a sugar transfer mechanism and also the ligand stereoselectivity determinant. Cryo-EM analyses uncover a TibC-TibA dodecamer/hexamer assembly with two enzyme molecules binding to one TibA substrate. The complex structure also highlights a high efficient hyperglycosylation of six autotransporter substrates simultaneously by the dodecamer enzyme complex.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Qing Yao

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Qiuhe Lu

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Xiaobo Wan

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Feng Song

    Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Yue Xu

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Mo Hu

    Peking University, Bejing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Alla Zamyatina

    University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Xiaoyun Liu

    Peking University, Bejing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Niu Huang

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Ping Zhu

    Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Feng Shao

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    shaofeng@nibs.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    Feng Shao, Reviewing editor, eLife.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Wilfred van der Donk, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, United States

Version history

  1. Received: June 17, 2014
  2. Accepted: October 12, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 13, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 18, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Yao et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,705
    views
  • 405
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Qing Yao
  2. Qiuhe Lu
  3. Xiaobo Wan
  4. Feng Song
  5. Yue Xu
  6. Mo Hu
  7. Alla Zamyatina
  8. Xiaoyun Liu
  9. Niu Huang
  10. Ping Zhu
  11. Feng Shao
(2014)
A structural mechanism for bacterial autotransporter glycosylation by a dodecameric heptosyltransferase family
eLife 3:e03714.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03714

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03714

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Damien M Rasmussen, Manny M Semonis ... Nicholas M Levinson
    Research Article

    The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Nicholas James Ose, Paul Campitelli ... Sefika Banu Ozkan
    Research Article

    We integrate evolutionary predictions based on the neutral theory of molecular evolution with protein dynamics to generate mechanistic insight into the molecular adaptations of the SARS-COV-2 spike (S) protein. With this approach, we first identified candidate adaptive polymorphisms (CAPs) of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and assessed the impact of these CAPs through dynamics analysis. Not only have we found that CAPs frequently overlap with well-known functional sites, but also, using several different dynamics-based metrics, we reveal the critical allosteric interplay between SARS-CoV-2 CAPs and the S protein binding sites with the human ACE2 (hACE2) protein. CAPs interact far differently with the hACE2 binding site residues in the open conformation of the S protein compared to the closed form. In particular, the CAP sites control the dynamics of binding residues in the open state, suggesting an allosteric control of hACE2 binding. We also explored the characteristic mutations of different SARS-CoV-2 strains to find dynamic hallmarks and potential effects of future mutations. Our analyses reveal that Delta strain-specific variants have non-additive (i.e., epistatic) interactions with CAP sites, whereas the less pathogenic Omicron strains have mostly additive mutations. Finally, our dynamics-based analysis suggests that the novel mutations observed in the Omicron strain epistatically interact with the CAP sites to help escape antibody binding.