ULK3 regulates cytokinetic abscission by phosphorylating ESCRT-III proteins

  1. Anna Caballe
  2. Dawn M Wenzel
  3. Monica Agromayor
  4. Steven L Alam
  5. Jack J Skalicky
  6. Magdalena Kloc
  7. Jeremy G Carlton
  8. Leticia Labrador
  9. Wesley I Sundquist
  10. Juan Martin-Serrano  Is a corresponding author
  1. King's College London School of Medicine, United Kingdom
  2. University of Utah School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

The Endosomal Sorting Complexes Required for Transport (ESCRT) machinery mediates the physical separation between daughter cells during cytokinetic abscission. This process is regulated by the abscission checkpoint, a genome protection mechanism that relies on Aurora B and the ESCRT-III subunit CHMP4C to delay abscission in response to chromosome missegregation. Here we show that Unc-51-like kinase 3 (ULK3) phosphorylates and binds ESCRT-III subunits via tandem MIT domains and thereby delays abscission in response to lagging chromosomes, nuclear pore defects and tension forces at the midbody. Our structural and biochemical studies reveal an unusually tight interaction between ULK3 and IST1, an ESCRT-III subunit required for abscission. We also demonstrate that IST1 phosphorylation by ULK3 is an essential signal required to sustain the abscission checkpoint and that ULK3 and CHMP4C are functionally linked components of the timer that controls abscission in multiple physiological situations.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anna Caballe

    Department of Infectious Diseases, King's College London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Dawn M Wenzel

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Monica Agromayor

    Department of Infectious Diseases, King's College London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Steven L Alam

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Jack J Skalicky

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Magdalena Kloc

    Department of Infectious Diseases, King's College London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Jeremy G Carlton

    Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Leticia Labrador

    Department of Infectious Diseases, King's College London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Wesley I Sundquist

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    Wesley I Sundquist, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  10. Juan Martin-Serrano

    Department of Infectious Diseases, King's College London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    juan.martin_serrano@kcl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mohan Balasubramanian, University of Warwick, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: January 18, 2015
  2. Accepted: May 23, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 26, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 22, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Caballe et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,951
    views
  • 1,001
    downloads
  • 79
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Anna Caballe
  2. Dawn M Wenzel
  3. Monica Agromayor
  4. Steven L Alam
  5. Jack J Skalicky
  6. Magdalena Kloc
  7. Jeremy G Carlton
  8. Leticia Labrador
  9. Wesley I Sundquist
  10. Juan Martin-Serrano
(2015)
ULK3 regulates cytokinetic abscission by phosphorylating ESCRT-III proteins
eLife 4:e06547.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06547

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06547

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.