Acidic pH and divalent cation sensing by PhoQ are dispensable for systemic salmonellae virulence

  1. Kevin G Hicks
  2. Scott Delbecq
  3. Enea Sancho-Vaello
  4. Marie-Pierre Blanc
  5. Katja K Dove
  6. Lynne R Prost
  7. Margaret E Daley
  8. Kornelius Zeth
  9. Rachel E Klevit
  10. Samuel I Miller  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Washington Medical School, United States
  2. Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Spain
  3. University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
  4. University of San Diego, United States
  5. Max-Planck-Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie, Germany

Abstract

Salmonellae PhoQ is a histidine kinase with a periplasmic sensor domain (PD) that promotes virulence by detecting the macrophage phagosome. PhoQ activity is repressed by divalent cations and induced in environments of acidic pH, limited divalent cations, and cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAMP). Previously, it was unclear which signals are sensed by salmonellae to promote PhoQ-mediated virulence. We defined conformational changes produced in the PhoQ PD on exposure to acidic pH that indicate structural flexibility is induced in α-helices 4 and 5, suggesting this region contributes to pH sensing. Therefore, we engineered a disulfide bond between W104C and A128C in the PhoQ PD that restrains conformational flexibility in α-helices 4 and 5. PhoQW104C-A128C is responsive to CAMP, but is inhibited for activation by acidic pH and divalent cation limitation. phoQW104C-A128C Salmonella enterica Typhimurium are virulent in mice, indicating that acidic pH and divalent cation sensing by PhoQ are dispensable for virulence.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kevin G Hicks

    Department of Microbiology, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Scott Delbecq

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Enea Sancho-Vaello

    Unidad de Biofísica, Centro Mixto Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Bizkaia, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marie-Pierre Blanc

    Department of Microbiology, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Katja K Dove

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Lynne R Prost

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Margaret E Daley

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Kornelius Zeth

    Department of Protein Evolution, Max-Planck-Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Rachel E Klevit

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Samuel I Miller

    Department of Microbiology, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    millersi@uw.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Feng Shao, National Institute of Biological Sciences, China

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (2982-02) of the University of Washington.

Version history

  1. Received: February 1, 2015
  2. Accepted: May 22, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 23, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 19, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Hicks et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,672
    views
  • 565
    downloads
  • 25
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kevin G Hicks
  2. Scott Delbecq
  3. Enea Sancho-Vaello
  4. Marie-Pierre Blanc
  5. Katja K Dove
  6. Lynne R Prost
  7. Margaret E Daley
  8. Kornelius Zeth
  9. Rachel E Klevit
  10. Samuel I Miller
(2015)
Acidic pH and divalent cation sensing by PhoQ are dispensable for systemic salmonellae virulence
eLife 4:e06792.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06792

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06792

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.