Abstract

Mutant KRAS colorectal cancer (CRC) cells release protein-laden exosomes that can alter the tumor microenvironment. To test whether exosomal RNAs also contribute to changes in gene expression in recipient cells, and whether mutant KRAS might regulate the composition of secreted miRNAs, we compared small RNAs of cells and matched exosomes from isogenic CRC cell lines differing only in KRAS status. We show that exosomal profiles are distinct from cellular profiles, and mutant exosomes cluster separately from wild type KRAS exosomes. miR-10b was selectively increased in wild type exosomes while miR-100 was increased in mutant exosomes. Neutral sphingomyelinase inhibition caused accumulation of miR-100 only in mutant cells, suggesting KRAS-dependent miRNA export. In Transwell co-culture experiments, mutant donor cells conferred miR-100-mediated target repression in wild type recipient cells. These findings suggest extracellular miRNAs can function in target cells and uncover a potential new mode of action for mutant KRAS in CRC.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Diana J Cha

    Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jeffrey L Franklin

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yongchao Dou

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Qi Liu

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. James N Higginbotham

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Michelle Demory Beckler

    Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Alissa M Weaver

    Department of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Kasey Vickers

    Department of Cardiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Nirpesh Prasad

    HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Shawn Levy

    HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Bing Zhang

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Robert J Coffey

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. James G Patton

    Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    For correspondence
    james.g.patton@vanderbilt.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Phillip D Zamore, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States

Version history

  1. Received: February 26, 2015
  2. Accepted: June 29, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 1, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 22, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Cha et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,802
    views
  • 1,748
    downloads
  • 278
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Diana J Cha
  2. Jeffrey L Franklin
  3. Yongchao Dou
  4. Qi Liu
  5. James N Higginbotham
  6. Michelle Demory Beckler
  7. Alissa M Weaver
  8. Kasey Vickers
  9. Nirpesh Prasad
  10. Shawn Levy
  11. Bing Zhang
  12. Robert J Coffey
  13. James G Patton
(2015)
KRAS-dependent sorting of miRNA to exosomes
eLife 4:e07197.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07197

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07197

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Samuel Pawel, Rachel Heyard ... Leonhard Held
    Research Article

    In several large-scale replication projects, statistically non-significant results in both the original and the replication study have been interpreted as a ‘replication success.’ Here, we discuss the logical problems with this approach: Non-significance in both studies does not ensure that the studies provide evidence for the absence of an effect and ‘replication success’ can virtually always be achieved if the sample sizes are small enough. In addition, the relevant error rates are not controlled. We show how methods, such as equivalence testing and Bayes factors, can be used to adequately quantify the evidence for the absence of an effect and how they can be applied in the replication setting. Using data from the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, the Experimental Philosophy Replicability Project, and the Reproducibility Project: Psychology we illustrate that many original and replication studies with ‘null results’ are in fact inconclusive. We conclude that it is important to also replicate studies with statistically non-significant results, but that they should be designed, analyzed, and interpreted appropriately.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Savvas Nikolaou, Amelie Juin ... Laura M Machesky
    Research Article

    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis, with high rates of metastasis and few treatment options. Hyperactivation of KRAS in almost all tumours drives RAC1 activation, conferring enhanced migratory and proliferative capacity as well as macropinocytosis. Macropinocytosis is well understood as a nutrient scavenging mechanism, but little is known about its functions in trafficking of signaling receptors. We find that CYRI-B is highly expressed in pancreatic tumours in a mouse model of KRAS and p53-driven pancreatic cancer. Deletion of Cyrib (the gene encoding CYRI-B protein) accelerates tumourigenesis, leading to enhanced ERK and JNK-induced proliferation in precancerous lesions, indicating a potential role as a buffer of RAC1 hyperactivation in early stages. However, as disease progresses, loss of CYRI-B inhibits metastasis. CYRI-B depleted tumour cells show reduced chemotactic responses to lysophosphatidic acid, a major driver of tumour spread, due to impaired macropinocytic uptake of the lysophosphatidic acid receptor-1. Overall, we implicate CYRI-B as a mediator of growth and signaling in pancreatic cancer, providing new insights into pathways controlling metastasis.