Dynamics and heterogeneity of a fate determinant during transition towards cell differentiation

  1. Nicolás Peláez
  2. Arnau Gavalda-Miralles
  3. Bao Wang
  4. Heliodoro Tejedor Navarro
  5. Herman Gudjonson
  6. Ilaria Rebay
  7. Aaron R Dinner
  8. Aggelos K Katsaggelos
  9. Luis AN Amaral
  10. Richard W Carthew  Is a corresponding author
  1. Northwestern University, United States
  2. Universitat Rovira i Virgili, United States
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Northwestern University, United States
  4. University of Chicago, United States

Abstract

Yan is an ETS-domain transcription factor responsible for maintaining Drosophila eye cells in a multipotent state. Using a fluorescent reporter for Yan expression, we observed a biphasic distribution of Yan in multipotent cells. Transitions to various differentiated states occurred over the course of this dynamic process, suggesting that Yan expression level does not strongly determine cell potential. Consistent with this conclusion, perturbing Yan expression by varying gene dosage had no effect on cell fate transitions. However, we observed that as cells transited to differentiation, Yan expression became highly heterogeneous and this heterogeneity was transient. Signals received via the EGF Receptor were necessary for the transience in Yan noise since genetic loss caused sustained noise. Since these signals are essential for eye cells to differentiate, we suggest that dynamic heterogeneity of Yan is a necessary element of the transition process, and cell states are stabilized through noise reduction.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nicolás Peláez

    Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Arnau Gavalda-Miralles

    Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Bao Wang

    Department Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Heliodoro Tejedor Navarro

    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Herman Gudjonson

    James Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ilaria Rebay

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Aaron R Dinner

    James Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Aggelos K Katsaggelos

    Department Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Luis AN Amaral

    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Richard W Carthew

    Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
    For correspondence
    r-carthew@northwestern.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Naama Barkai, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel

Version history

  1. Received: May 22, 2015
  2. Accepted: November 18, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 19, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 13, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Peláez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,424
    views
  • 775
    downloads
  • 38
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nicolás Peláez
  2. Arnau Gavalda-Miralles
  3. Bao Wang
  4. Heliodoro Tejedor Navarro
  5. Herman Gudjonson
  6. Ilaria Rebay
  7. Aaron R Dinner
  8. Aggelos K Katsaggelos
  9. Luis AN Amaral
  10. Richard W Carthew
(2015)
Dynamics and heterogeneity of a fate determinant during transition towards cell differentiation
eLife 4:e08924.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08924

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08924

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Maksim Kleverov, Daria Zenkova ... Alexey A Sergushichev
    Research Article

    Transcriptomic profiling became a standard approach to quantify a cell state, which led to accumulation of huge amount of public gene expression datasets. However, both reuse of these datasets or analysis of newly generated ones requires significant technical expertise. Here we present Phantasus - a user-friendly web-application for interactive gene expression analysis which provides a streamlined access to more than 96000 public gene expression datasets, as well as allows analysis of user-uploaded datasets. Phantasus integrates an intuitive and highly interactive JavaScript-based heatmap interface with an ability to run sophisticated R-based analysis methods. Overall Phantasus allows users to go all the way from loading, normalizing and filtering data to doing differential gene expression and downstream analysis. Phantasus can be accessed on-line at https://alserglab.wustl.edu/phantasus or can be installed locally from Bioconductor (https://bioconductor.org/packages/phantasus). Phantasus source code is available at https://github.com/ctlab/phantasus under MIT license.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Ryan T Bell, Harutyun Sahakyan ... Eugene V Koonin
    Research Article

    A comprehensive census of McrBC systems, among the most common forms of prokaryotic Type IV restriction systems, followed by phylogenetic analysis, reveals their enormous abundance in diverse prokaryotes and a plethora of genomic associations. We focus on a previously uncharacterized branch, which we denote coiled-coil nuclease tandems (CoCoNuTs) for their salient features: the presence of extensive coiled-coil structures and tandem nucleases. The CoCoNuTs alone show extraordinary variety, with three distinct types and multiple subtypes. All CoCoNuTs contain domains predicted to interact with translation system components, such as OB-folds resembling the SmpB protein that binds bacterial transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), YTH-like domains that might recognize methylated tmRNA, tRNA, or rRNA, and RNA-binding Hsp70 chaperone homologs, along with RNases, such as HEPN domains, all suggesting that the CoCoNuTs target RNA. Many CoCoNuTs might additionally target DNA, via McrC nuclease homologs. Additional restriction systems, such as Type I RM, BREX, and Druantia Type III, are frequently encoded in the same predicted superoperons. In many of these superoperons, CoCoNuTs are likely regulated by cyclic nucleotides, possibly, RNA fragments with cyclic termini, that bind associated CARF (CRISPR-Associated Rossmann Fold) domains. We hypothesize that the CoCoNuTs, together with the ancillary restriction factors, employ an echeloned defense strategy analogous to that of Type III CRISPR-Cas systems, in which an immune response eliminating virus DNA and/or RNA is launched first, but then, if it fails, an abortive infection response leading to PCD/dormancy via host RNA cleavage takes over.