Residue proximity information and protein model discrimination using saturation-suppressor mutagenesis

Abstract

Identification of residue-residue contacts from primary sequence can be used to guide protein structure prediction. Using Escherichia coli CcdB as the test case, we describe an experimental method termed saturation-suppressor mutagenesis to acquire residue contact information. In this methodology, for each of five inactive CcdB mutants, exhaustive screens for suppressors were performed. Proximal suppressors were accurately discriminated from distal suppressors based on their phenotypes when present as single mutants. Experimentally identified putative proximal pairs formed spatial constraints to recover >98% of native-like models of CcdB from a decoy dataset. Suppressor methodology was also applied to the integral membrane protein, diacylglycerol kinase A where the structures determined by X-ray crystallography and NMR were significantly different. Suppressor as well as sequence co-variation data clearly point to the X-ray structure being the functional one adopted in-vivo. The methodology is applicable to any macromolecular system for which a convenient phenotypic assay exists.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anusmita Sahoo

    Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    Anusmita Sahoo, is an author on a patent application filed on behalf of the Indian Institute of Science, involving saturation suppressor mutagenesis methodology.
  2. Shruti Khare

    Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    Shruti Khare, is an author on a patent application filed on behalf of the Indian Institute of Science, involving saturation suppressor mutagenesis methodology.
  3. Sivasankar Devanarayanan

    Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Pankaj Jain

    Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    Pankaj Jain, is an author on a patent application filed on behalf of the Indian Institute of Science, involving saturation suppressor mutagenesis methodology.
  5. Raghavan Varadarajan

    Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
    For correspondence
    varadar@mbu.iisc.ernet.in
    Competing interests
    Raghavan Varadarajan, is an author on a patent application filed on behalf of the Indian Institute of Science, involving saturation suppressor mutagenesis methodology.

Reviewing Editor

  1. John Kuriyan, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Version history

  1. Received: June 18, 2015
  2. Accepted: December 29, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 30, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 8, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Sahoo et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,062
    views
  • 466
    downloads
  • 34
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Anusmita Sahoo
  2. Shruti Khare
  3. Sivasankar Devanarayanan
  4. Pankaj Jain
  5. Raghavan Varadarajan
(2015)
Residue proximity information and protein model discrimination using saturation-suppressor mutagenesis
eLife 4:e09532.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09532

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09532

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Damien M Rasmussen, Manny M Semonis ... Nicholas M Levinson
    Research Article

    The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Nicholas James Ose, Paul Campitelli ... Sefika Banu Ozkan
    Research Article

    We integrate evolutionary predictions based on the neutral theory of molecular evolution with protein dynamics to generate mechanistic insight into the molecular adaptations of the SARS-COV-2 spike (S) protein. With this approach, we first identified candidate adaptive polymorphisms (CAPs) of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and assessed the impact of these CAPs through dynamics analysis. Not only have we found that CAPs frequently overlap with well-known functional sites, but also, using several different dynamics-based metrics, we reveal the critical allosteric interplay between SARS-CoV-2 CAPs and the S protein binding sites with the human ACE2 (hACE2) protein. CAPs interact far differently with the hACE2 binding site residues in the open conformation of the S protein compared to the closed form. In particular, the CAP sites control the dynamics of binding residues in the open state, suggesting an allosteric control of hACE2 binding. We also explored the characteristic mutations of different SARS-CoV-2 strains to find dynamic hallmarks and potential effects of future mutations. Our analyses reveal that Delta strain-specific variants have non-additive (i.e., epistatic) interactions with CAP sites, whereas the less pathogenic Omicron strains have mostly additive mutations. Finally, our dynamics-based analysis suggests that the novel mutations observed in the Omicron strain epistatically interact with the CAP sites to help escape antibody binding.