Munc18-1-regulated stage-wise SNARE assembly underlying synaptic exocytosis

  1. Lu Ma
  2. Aleksander A Rebane
  3. Guangcan Yang
  4. Zhiqun Xi
  5. Yuhao Kang
  6. Ying Gao
  7. Yongli Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Yale University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Yale School of Medicine, United States
  3. Yale University, School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Synaptic soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptor (SNARE) proteins couple their stage-wise folding/assembly to rapid exocytosis of neurotransmitters in a Munc18-1-dependent manner. The functions of the different assembly stages in exocytosis and the role of Munc18-1 in SNARE assembly are not well understood. Using optical tweezers, we observed four distinct stages of assembly in SNARE N-terminal, middle, C-terminal, and linker domains (or NTD, MD, CTD and LD, respectively). We found that SNARE layer mutations differentially affect SNARE assembly. Comparison of their effects on SNARE assembly and on exocytosis reveals that NTD and CTD are responsible for vesicle docking and fusion, respectively, whereas MD regulates SNARE assembly and fusion. Munc18-1 initiates SNARE assembly and structures t-SNARE C-terminus independent of syntaxin N-terminal regulatory domain (NRD) and stabilizes the half-zippered SNARE complex dependent upon the NRD. Our observations demonstrate distinct functions of SNARE domains whose assembly is intimately chaperoned by Munc18-1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lu Ma

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Aleksander A Rebane

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Guangcan Yang

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Zhiqun Xi

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yuhao Kang

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ying Gao

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Yongli Zhang

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    yongli.zhang@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Stephen C. Harrison, Harvard Medical School, United States

Version history

  1. Received: June 23, 2015
  2. Accepted: December 22, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 23, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 27, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: March 21, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2015, Ma et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,394
    views
  • 654
    downloads
  • 71
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lu Ma
  2. Aleksander A Rebane
  3. Guangcan Yang
  4. Zhiqun Xi
  5. Yuhao Kang
  6. Ying Gao
  7. Yongli Zhang
(2015)
Munc18-1-regulated stage-wise SNARE assembly underlying synaptic exocytosis
eLife 4:e09580.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09580

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09580

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Taegon Chung, Iksoo Chang, Sangyeol Kim
    Research Article

    Locomotion is a fundamental behavior of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Previous works on kinetic simulations of animals helped researchers understand the physical mechanisms of locomotion and the muscle-controlling principles of neuronal circuits as an actuator part. It has yet to be understood how C. elegans utilizes the frictional forces caused by the tension of its muscles to perform sequenced locomotive behaviors. Here, we present a two-dimensional rigid body chain model for the locomotion of C. elegans by developing Newtonian equations of motion for each body segment of C. elegans. Having accounted for friction-coefficients of the surrounding environment, elastic constants of C. elegans, and its kymogram from experiments, our kinetic model (ElegansBot) reproduced various locomotion of C. elegans such as, but not limited to, forward-backward-(omega turn)-forward locomotion constituting escaping behavior and delta-turn navigation. Additionally, ElegansBot precisely quantified the forces acting on each body segment of C. elegans to allow investigation of the force distribution. This model will facilitate our understanding of the detailed mechanism of various locomotive behaviors at any given friction-coefficients of the surrounding environment. Furthermore, as the model ensures the performance of realistic behavior, it can be used to research actuator-controller interaction between muscles and neuronal circuits.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Giulio Facchini, Alann Rathery ... Andrea Perna
    Research Article

    Termites build complex nests which are an impressive example of self-organization. We know that the coordinated actions involved in the construction of these nests by multiple individuals are primarily mediated by signals and cues embedded in the structure of the nest itself. However, to date there is still no scientific consensus about the nature of the stimuli that guide termite construction, and how they are sensed by termites. In order to address these questions, we studied the early building behavior of Coptotermes gestroi termites in artificial arenas, decorated with topographic cues to stimulate construction. Pellet collections were evenly distributed across the experimental setup, compatible with a collection mechanism that is not affected by local topography, but only by the distribution of termite occupancy (termites pick pellets at the positions where they are). Conversely, pellet depositions were concentrated at locations of high surface curvature and at the boundaries between different types of substrate. The single feature shared by all pellet deposition regions was that they correspond to local maxima in the evaporation flux. We can show analytically and we confirm experimentally that evaporation flux is directly proportional to the local curvature of nest surfaces. Taken together, our results indicate that surface curvature is sufficient to organize termite building activity and that termites likely sense curvature indirectly through substrate evaporation. Our findings reconcile the apparently discordant results of previous studies.