Identification of Pol IV and RDR2-dependent precursors of 24 nt siRNAs guiding de novo DNA methylation in Arabidopsis

  1. Todd Blevins
  2. Ram Podicheti
  3. Vibhor Mishra
  4. Michelle Marasco
  5. Jing Wang
  6. Douglas Rusch
  7. Haixu Tang
  8. Craig S Pikaard  Is a corresponding author
  1. Université de Strasbourg, France
  2. Indiana University, United States
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Indiana University, United States

Abstract

In Arabidopsis thaliana, abundant 24 nt siRNAs guide the cytosine methylation and silencing of transposons and a subset of genes. 24 nt siRNA biogenesis requires nuclear RNA Polymerase IV (Pol IV), RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2 (RDR2) and DICER-LIKE3 (DCL3). However, siRNA precursors are mostly undefined. We identified Pol IV and RDR2-dependent RNAs (P4R2 RNAs) that accumulate in dcl3 mutants and are diced into 24 nt RNAs by DCL3 in vitro. P4R2 RNAs are mostly 26-45 nt and initiate with a purine adjacent to a pyrimidine, characteristics shared by Pol IV transcripts generated in vitro. RDR2 terminal transferase activity, also demonstrated in vitro, may account for occasional non-templated nucleotides at P4R2 RNA 3' termini. 24 nt siRNAs primarily correspond to the 5' or 3' ends of P4R2 RNAs, suggesting a model whereby siRNAs are generated from either end of P4R2 duplexes by single dicing events.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Todd Blevins

    : Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes du CNRS, UPR2357, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ram Podicheti

    Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Vibhor Mishra

    Department of Biology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michelle Marasco

    Department of Biology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jing Wang

    Department of Biology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Douglas Rusch

    Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Haixu Tang

    School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Craig S Pikaard

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    For correspondence
    cpikaard@indiana.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Daniel Zilberman, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Version history

  1. Received: June 21, 2015
  2. Accepted: October 1, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 2, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 8, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Blevins et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,118
    views
  • 1,160
    downloads
  • 204
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Todd Blevins
  2. Ram Podicheti
  3. Vibhor Mishra
  4. Michelle Marasco
  5. Jing Wang
  6. Douglas Rusch
  7. Haixu Tang
  8. Craig S Pikaard
(2015)
Identification of Pol IV and RDR2-dependent precursors of 24 nt siRNAs guiding de novo DNA methylation in Arabidopsis
eLife 4:e09591.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09591

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09591

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Rupam Choudhury, Anuroop Venkateswaran Venkatasubramani ... Axel Imhof
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic chromatin is organized into functional domains, that are characterized by distinct proteomic compositions and specific nuclear positions. In contrast to cellular organelles surrounded by lipid membranes, the composition of distinct chromatin domains is rather ill described and highly dynamic. To gain molecular insight into these domains and explore their composition, we developed an antibody-based proximity-biotinylation method targeting the RNA and proteins constituents. The method that we termed Antibody-Mediated-Proximity-Labelling-coupled to Mass Spectrometry (AMPL-MS) does not require the expression of fusion proteins and therefore constitutes a versatile and very sensitive method to characterize the composition of chromatin domains based on specific signature proteins or histone modifications. To demonstrate the utility of our approach we used AMPL-MS to characterize the molecular features of the chromocenter as well as the chromosome territory containing the hyperactive X-chromosome in Drosophila. This analysis identified a number of known RNA binding proteins in proximity of the hyperactive X and the centromere, supporting the accuracy of our method. In addition, it enabled us to characterize the role of RNA in the formation of these nuclear bodies. Furthermore, our method identified a new set of RNA molecules associated with the Drosophila centromere. Characterization of these novel molecules suggested the formation of R-loops in centromeres, which we validated using a novel probe for R-loops in Drosophila. Taken together, AMPL-MS improves the selectivity and specificity of proximity ligation allowing for novel discoveries of weak protein-RNA interactions in biologically diverse domains.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Gregory Caleb Howard, Jing Wang ... William P Tansey
    Research Article

    The chromatin-associated protein WD Repeat Domain 5 (WDR5) is a promising target for cancer drug discovery, with most efforts blocking an arginine-binding cavity on the protein called the ‘WIN’ site that tethers WDR5 to chromatin. WIN site inhibitors (WINi) are active against multiple cancer cell types in vitro, the most notable of which are those derived from MLL-rearranged (MLLr) leukemias. Peptidomimetic WINi were originally proposed to inhibit MLLr cells via dysregulation of genes connected to hematopoietic stem cell expansion. Our discovery and interrogation of small-molecule WINi, however, revealed that they act in MLLr cell lines to suppress ribosome protein gene (RPG) transcription, induce nucleolar stress, and activate p53. Because there is no precedent for an anticancer strategy that specifically targets RPG expression, we took an integrated multi-omics approach to further interrogate the mechanism of action of WINi in human MLLr cancer cells. We show that WINi induce depletion of the stock of ribosomes, accompanied by a broad yet modest translational choke and changes in alternative mRNA splicing that inactivate the p53 antagonist MDM4. We also show that WINi are synergistic with agents including venetoclax and BET-bromodomain inhibitors. Together, these studies reinforce the concept that WINi are a novel type of ribosome-directed anticancer therapy and provide a resource to support their clinical implementation in MLLr leukemias and other malignancies.