1. Neuroscience

Auxiliary subunits of the CKAMP family differentially modulate AMPA receptor properties

  1. Paul Farrow
  2. Konstantin Khodosevich
  3. Yechiam Sapir
  4. Anton Schulmann
  5. Muhammad Aslam
  6. Yael Stern-Bach
  7. Hannah Monyer
  8. Jakob von Engelhardt  Is a corresponding author
  1. German Cancer Research Center, Germany
  2. Copenhagen University, Denmark
  3. Institute for Medical Research - Israel-Canada, Israel
  4. Heidelberg University, Germany
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09693
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Paul Farrow
  2. Konstantin Khodosevich
  3. Yechiam Sapir
  4. Anton Schulmann
  5. Muhammad Aslam
  6. Yael Stern-Bach
  7. Hannah Monyer
  8. Jakob von Engelhardt
(2015)
Auxiliary subunits of the CKAMP family differentially modulate AMPA receptor properties
eLife 4:e09693.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09693
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

AMPA receptor (AMPAR) function is modulated by auxiliary subunits. Here, we report on three AMPAR interacting proteins - namely CKAMP39, CKAMP52 and CKAMP59 - that, together with the previously characterized CKAMP44, constitute a novel family of auxiliary subunits distinct from other families of AMPAR interacting proteins. The new members of the CKAMP family display distinct regional and developmental expression profiles in the mouse brain. Notably, despite their structural similarities they exert diverse modulation on AMPAR gating by influencing deactivation, desensitization and recovery from desensitization, as well as glutamate and cyclothiazide potency to AMPARs. This study indicates that AMPAR function is very precisely controlled by the cell-type specific expression of the CKAMP family members.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Paul Farrow

    Synaptic Signalling and Neurodegeneration, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Konstantin Khodosevich

    Biotech Research and Innovation Center, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Yechiam Sapir

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute for Medical Research - Israel-Canada, Jerusalem, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Anton Schulmann

    Department of Clinical Neurobiology, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Muhammad Aslam

    Synaptic Signalling and Neurodegeneration, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Yael Stern-Bach

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute for Medical Research - Israel-Canada, Jerusalem, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Hannah Monyer

    Department of Clinical Neurobiology, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Jakob von Engelhardt

    Synaptic Signalling and Neurodegeneration, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
    For correspondence
    engelhardt@dzne.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Marlene Bartos, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany

Version history

  1. Received: June 25, 2015
  2. Accepted: November 30, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 1, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 19, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: October 11, 2018 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2015, Farrow et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,487
    views
  • 614
    downloads
  • 53
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Paul Farrow
  2. Konstantin Khodosevich
  3. Yechiam Sapir
  4. Anton Schulmann
  5. Muhammad Aslam
  6. Yael Stern-Bach
  7. Hannah Monyer
  8. Jakob von Engelhardt
(2015)
Auxiliary subunits of the CKAMP family differentially modulate AMPA receptor properties
eLife 4:e09693.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09693

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09693

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    Deciphering the chemical language of inbred and wild mouse conspecific scents

    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.

    1. Neuroscience

    Functional diversity of dopamine axons in prefrontal cortex during classical conditioning

    Kenta Abe, Yuki Kambe ... Tatsuo Sato
    Research Article

    Midbrain dopamine neurons impact neural processing in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) through mesocortical projections. However, the signals conveyed by dopamine projections to the PFC remain unclear, particularly at the single-axon level. Here, we investigated dopaminergic axonal activity in the medial PFC (mPFC) during reward and aversive processing. By optimizing microprism-mediated two-photon calcium imaging of dopamine axon terminals, we found diverse activity in dopamine axons responsive to both reward and aversive stimuli. Some axons exhibited a preference for reward, while others favored aversive stimuli, and there was a strong bias for the latter at the population level. Long-term longitudinal imaging revealed that the preference was maintained in reward- and aversive-preferring axons throughout classical conditioning in which rewarding and aversive stimuli were paired with preceding auditory cues. However, as mice learned to discriminate reward or aversive cues, a cue activity preference gradually developed only in aversive-preferring axons. We inferred the trial-by-trial cue discrimination based on machine learning using anticipatory licking or facial expressions, and found that successful discrimination was accompanied by sharper selectivity for the aversive cue in aversive-preferring axons. Our findings indicate that a group of mesocortical dopamine axons encodes aversive-related signals, which are modulated by both classical conditioning across days and trial-by-trial discrimination within a day.