Near-infrared photoactivatable control of Ca2+ signaling and optogenetic immunomodulation

  1. Lian He
  2. Yuanwei Zhang
  3. Guolin Ma
  4. Peng Tan
  5. Zhanjun Li
  6. Shengbing Zhang
  7. Xiang Wu
  8. Ji Jing
  9. Shaohai Fang
  10. Lijuan Zhou
  11. Youjun Wang
  12. Yun Huang
  13. Patrick Hogan
  14. Gang Han
  15. Yubin Zhou  Is a corresponding author
  1. Texas A&M University Health Science Center, United States
  2. University of Massachusetts Medical school, United States
  3. University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States
  4. Beijing Normal University, China
  5. La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, United States

Abstract

The application of current channelrhodopsin-based optogenetic tools is limited by the lack of strict ion selectivity and the inability to extend the spectra sensitivity into the near-infrared (NIR) tissue transmissible range. Here we present an NIR-stimulable optogenetic platform (termed "Opto-CRAC") that selectively and remotely controls Ca2+ oscillations and Ca2+-responsive gene expression to regulate the function of non-excitable cells, including T lymphocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells. When coupled to upconversion nanoparticles, the optogenetic operation window is shifted from the visible range to NIR wavelengths to enable wireless photoactivation of Ca2+-dependent signaling and optogenetic modulation of immunoinflammatory responses. In a mouse model of melanoma by using ovalbumin as surrogate tumor antigen, Opto-CRAC has been shown to act as a genetically-encoded "photoactivatable adjuvant" to improve antigen-specific immune responses to specifically destruct tumor cells. Our study represents a solid step forward towards the goal of achieving remote control of Ca2+-modulated activities with tailored function.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lian He

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yuanwei Zhang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical school, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Guolin Ma

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Peng Tan

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Zhanjun Li

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Shengbing Zhang

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Xiang Wu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ji Jing

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Shaohai Fang

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Lijuan Zhou

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Gene Resource and Molecular Development, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Youjun Wang

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Gene Resource and Molecular Development, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yun Huang

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Patrick Hogan

    Division of Signaling and Gene Expression, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Gang Han

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Yubin Zhou

    Center for Translational Cancer Research, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    yzhou@ibt.tamhsc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Richard Aldrich, The University of Texas at Austin, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mice-related experiments were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center (#12044 and #2014-0228-IBT; Houston, TX, USA; Animal Welfare Assurance Number A3893-01) and University of Massachusetts Medical School (#A-2512-15, Worcester, MA, USA; Animal Welfare Assurance Number A3306-01).

Version history

  1. Received: July 11, 2015
  2. Accepted: November 6, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 8, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 29, 2015 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: June 13, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2015, He et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 12,344
    views
  • 2,442
    downloads
  • 179
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lian He
  2. Yuanwei Zhang
  3. Guolin Ma
  4. Peng Tan
  5. Zhanjun Li
  6. Shengbing Zhang
  7. Xiang Wu
  8. Ji Jing
  9. Shaohai Fang
  10. Lijuan Zhou
  11. Youjun Wang
  12. Yun Huang
  13. Patrick Hogan
  14. Gang Han
  15. Yubin Zhou
(2015)
Near-infrared photoactivatable control of Ca2+ signaling and optogenetic immunomodulation
eLife 4:e10024.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10024

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10024

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.