Identification of a Munc13-sensitive step in chromaffin cell large dense-core vesicle exocytosis

  1. Kwun-nok Mimi Man
  2. Cordelia Imig
  3. Alexander Matthias Walter
  4. Paulo S Pinheiro
  5. David R Stevens
  6. Jens Rettig
  7. Jakob B Sørensen
  8. Benjamin H Cooper
  9. Nils Brose
  10. Sonja M Wojcik  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max-Planck-Institut fuer Experimentelle Medizin, Germany
  2. Leibniz-Institute for Molecular Pharmacology, Germany
  3. University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  4. Saarland University, Germany

Abstract

It is currently unknown whether the molecular steps of large dense-core vesicle (LDCV) docking and priming are identical to the corresponding reactions in synaptic vesicle (SV) exocytosis. Munc13s are essential for SV docking and priming, and we systematically analyzed their role in LDCV exocytosis using chromaffin cells lacking individual isoforms. We show that particularly Munc13-2 plays a fundamental role in LDCV exocytosis, but in contrast to synapses lacking Munc13s, the corresponding chromaffin cells do not exhibit a vesicle docking defect. We further demonstrate that ubMunc13-2 and Munc13-1 confer Ca2+-dependent LDCV priming with similar affinities, but distinct kinetics. Using a mathematical model, we identify an early LDCV priming step that is strongly dependent upon Munc13s. Our data demonstrate that the molecular steps of SV and LDCV priming are very similar while SV and LDCV docking mechanisms are distinct.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kwun-nok Mimi Man

    Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institut fuer Experimentelle Medizin, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Cordelia Imig

    Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institut fuer Experimentelle Medizin, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alexander Matthias Walter

    Leibniz-Institute for Molecular Pharmacology, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Paulo S Pinheiro

    Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Lundbeck Foundation Center for Biomembranes in Nanomedicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David R Stevens

    Department of Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jens Rettig

    Department of Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jakob B Sørensen

    Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Lundbeck Foundation Center for Biomembranes in Nanomedicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Benjamin H Cooper

    Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institut fuer Experimentelle Medizin, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Nils Brose

    Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institut fuer Experimentelle Medizin, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sonja M Wojcik

    Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institut fuer Experimentelle Medizin, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    wojcik@em.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Axel T Brunger, Stanford University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were performed in compliance with the regulations of the local Animal Care and Use Committee of Lower Saxony, Oldenburg, Germany.

Version history

  1. Received: August 5, 2015
  2. Accepted: November 16, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 17, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 8, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Man et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,705
    views
  • 686
    downloads
  • 40
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kwun-nok Mimi Man
  2. Cordelia Imig
  3. Alexander Matthias Walter
  4. Paulo S Pinheiro
  5. David R Stevens
  6. Jens Rettig
  7. Jakob B Sørensen
  8. Benjamin H Cooper
  9. Nils Brose
  10. Sonja M Wojcik
(2015)
Identification of a Munc13-sensitive step in chromaffin cell large dense-core vesicle exocytosis
eLife 4:e10635.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10635

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10635

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ya-Hui Lin, Li-Wen Wang ... Li-An Chu
    Research Article

    Tissue-clearing and labeling techniques have revolutionized brain-wide imaging and analysis, yet their application to clinical formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks remains challenging. We introduce HIF-Clear, a novel method for efficiently clearing and labeling centimeter-thick FFPE specimens using elevated temperature and concentrated detergents. HIF-Clear with multi-round immunolabeling reveals neuron circuitry regulating multiple neurotransmitter systems in a whole FFPE mouse brain and is able to be used as the evaluation of disease treatment efficiency. HIF-Clear also supports expansion microscopy and can be performed on a non-sectioned 15-year-old FFPE specimen, as well as a 3-month formalin-fixed mouse brain. Thus, HIF-Clear represents a feasible approach for researching archived FFPE specimens for future neuroscientific and 3D neuropathological analyses.

    1. Neuroscience
    Amanda Chu, Nicholas T Gordon ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Article

    Pavlovian fear conditioning has been extensively used to study the behavioral and neural basis of defensive systems. In a typical procedure, a cue is paired with foot shock, and subsequent cue presentation elicits freezing, a behavior theoretically linked to predator detection. Studies have since shown a fear conditioned cue can elicit locomotion, a behavior that - in addition to jumping, and rearing - is theoretically linked to imminent or occurring predation. A criticism of studies observing fear conditioned cue-elicited locomotion is that responding is non-associative. We gave rats Pavlovian fear discrimination over a baseline of reward seeking. TTL-triggered cameras captured 5 behavior frames/s around cue presentation. Experiment 1 examined the emergence of danger-specific behaviors over fear acquisition. Experiment 2 examined the expression of danger-specific behaviors in fear extinction. In total, we scored 112,000 frames for nine discrete behavior categories. Temporal ethograms show that during acquisition, a fear conditioned cue suppresses reward seeking and elicits freezing, but also elicits locomotion, jumping, and rearing - all of which are maximal when foot shock is imminent. During extinction, a fear conditioned cue most prominently suppresses reward seeking, and elicits locomotion that is timed to shock delivery. The independent expression of these behaviors in both experiments reveal a fear conditioned cue to orchestrate a temporally organized suite of behaviors.