An aspartyl protease defines a novel pathway for export of Toxoplasma proteins into the host cell

  1. Michael J Coffey
  2. Brad E Sleebs
  3. Alessandro D Uboldi
  4. Alexandra L Garnham
  5. Magdalena Franco
  6. Nicole D Marino
  7. Michael W Panas
  8. David JP Ferguson
  9. Marta Enciso
  10. Matthew T O'Neill
  11. Sash Lopaticki
  12. Rebecca J Stewart
  13. Grant Dewson
  14. Gordon K Smyth
  15. Brian J Smith
  16. Seth L Masters
  17. John C Boothroyd
  18. Justin A Boddey
  19. Christopher J Tonkin  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Australia
  2. Stanford University School of Medicine, United States
  3. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  4. La Trobe University, Australia
  5. Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Australia

Abstract

Infection by Toxoplasma gondii leads to massive changes to the host cell. Here we identify a novel host cell effector export pathway, which requires the Golgi-resident Aspartyl Protease 5 (ASP5). We demonstrate that ASP5 cleaves a highly constrained amino acid motif that has similarity to the PEXEL-motif of Plasmodium parasites. We show that ASP5 matures substrates at both the N- and C-terminal ends of proteins and also controls trafficking of effectors without this motif. Furthermore, ASP5 controls establishment of the nanotubular network and is required for the efficient recruitment of host mitochondria to the vacuole. Assessment of host gene expression reveals that the ASP5-dependent pathway influences thousands of the transcriptional changes that Toxoplasma imparts on its host cell. All these changes result in attenuation of virulence of Δasp5 tachyzoites in vivo. This work characterizes the first identified machinery required for export of Toxoplasma effectors into the infected host cell.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michael J Coffey

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Brad E Sleebs

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alessandro D Uboldi

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alexandra L Garnham

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Magdalena Franco

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nicole D Marino

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Michael W Panas

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. David JP Ferguson

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, University of Oxford, Oxoford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marta Enciso

    La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Matthew T O'Neill

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Sash Lopaticki

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Rebecca J Stewart

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Grant Dewson

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Gordon K Smyth

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Brian J Smith

    La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Seth L Masters

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. John C Boothroyd

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Justin A Boddey

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Christopher J Tonkin

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    tonkin@wehi.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Axel A Brakhage, Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Hans-Knöll-Institut, Germany

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments complied with the regulatory standards of and were approved by the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Animal Ethics Committees under approval number 2014.019.

Version history

  1. Received: August 13, 2015
  2. Accepted: November 18, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 18, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 10, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Coffey et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,085
    views
  • 891
    downloads
  • 93
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michael J Coffey
  2. Brad E Sleebs
  3. Alessandro D Uboldi
  4. Alexandra L Garnham
  5. Magdalena Franco
  6. Nicole D Marino
  7. Michael W Panas
  8. David JP Ferguson
  9. Marta Enciso
  10. Matthew T O'Neill
  11. Sash Lopaticki
  12. Rebecca J Stewart
  13. Grant Dewson
  14. Gordon K Smyth
  15. Brian J Smith
  16. Seth L Masters
  17. John C Boothroyd
  18. Justin A Boddey
  19. Christopher J Tonkin
(2015)
An aspartyl protease defines a novel pathway for export of Toxoplasma proteins into the host cell
eLife 4:e10809.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10809

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10809

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Hina Khan, Partha Paul ... Dibyendu Sarkar
    Research Article

    Survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis within the host macrophages requires the bacterial virulence regulator PhoP, but the underlying reason remains unknown. 3′,5′-Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is one of the most widely used second messengers, which impacts a wide range of cellular responses in microbial pathogens including M. tuberculosis. Herein, we hypothesized that intra-bacterial cAMP level could be controlled by PhoP since this major regulator plays a key role in bacterial responses against numerous stress conditions. A transcriptomic analysis reveals that PhoP functions as a repressor of cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE) Rv0805, which hydrolyzes cAMP. In keeping with these results, we find specific recruitment of the regulator within the promoter region of rv0805 PDE, and absence of phoP or ectopic expression of rv0805 independently accounts for elevated PDE synthesis, leading to the depletion of intra-bacterial cAMP level. Thus, genetic manipulation to inactivate PhoP-rv0805-cAMP pathway decreases cAMP level, stress tolerance, and intracellular survival of the bacillus.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.