Structural basis of death domain signaling in the p75 neurotrophin receptor

  1. Zhi Lin
  2. Jason Y Tann
  3. Eddy TH Goh
  4. Claire Kelly
  5. Kim Buay Lim
  6. Jian Fang Gao
  7. Carlos F Ibanez  Is a corresponding author
  1. National University of Singapore, Singapore
  2. Karolinska Institute, Sweden

Abstract

Death domains (DDs) mediate assembly of oligomeric complexes for activation of downstream signaling pathways through incompletely understood mechanisms. Here we report structures of complexes formed by the DD of p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) with RhoGDI, for activation of the RhoA pathway, with caspase recruitment domain (CARD) of RIP2 kinase, for activation of the NF-kB pathway, and with itself, revealing how DD dimerization controls access of intracellular effectors to the receptor. RIP2 CARD and RhoGDI bind to p75NTR DD at partially overlapping epitopes with over 100-fold difference in affinity, revealing the mechanism by which RIP2 recruitment displaces RhoGDI upon ligand binding. The p75NTR DD forms non-covalent, low-affinity symmetric dimers in solution. The dimer interface overlaps with RIP2 CARD but not RhoGDI binding sites, supporting a model of receptor activation triggered by separation of DDs. These structures reveal how competitive protein-protein interactions orchestrate the hierarchical activation of downstream pathways in non-catalytic receptors.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zhi Lin

    Department of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapre, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jason Y Tann

    Department of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Eddy TH Goh

    Department of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapre, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Claire Kelly

    Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kim Buay Lim

    Department of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jian Fang Gao

    Department of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Carlos F Ibanez

    Department of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    For correspondence
    phscfi@nus.edu.sg
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. David D Ginty, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Work on Rip2 knock-out mice has been approved by the ethical council of Sweden, ethical protocol number N242/13.

Version history

  1. Received: September 20, 2015
  2. Accepted: December 6, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 8, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 22, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Lin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,363
    views
  • 645
    downloads
  • 66
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zhi Lin
  2. Jason Y Tann
  3. Eddy TH Goh
  4. Claire Kelly
  5. Kim Buay Lim
  6. Jian Fang Gao
  7. Carlos F Ibanez
(2015)
Structural basis of death domain signaling in the p75 neurotrophin receptor
eLife 4:e11692.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11692

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11692

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Damien M Rasmussen, Manny M Semonis ... Nicholas M Levinson
    Research Article

    The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.