Protein translocation channel of mitochondrial inner membrane and matrix-exposed import motor communicate via two-domain coupling protein

Abstract

The majority of mitochondrial proteins are targeted to mitochondria by N-terminal presequences and use the TIM23 complex for their translocation across the mitochondrial inner membrane. During import, translocation through the channel in the inner membrane is coupled to the ATP-dependent action of an Hsp70-based import motor at the matrix face. How these two processes are coordinated remained unclear. We show here that the two domain structure of Tim44 plays a central role in this process. The N-terminal domain of Tim44 interacts with the components of the import motor whereas its C-terminal domain interacts with the translocation channel and is in contact with translocating proteins. Our data suggest that the translocation channel and the import motor of the TIM23 complex communicate through rearrangements of the two domains of Tim44 that are stimulated by translocating proteins.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rupa Banerjee

    Biomedical Center Munich, Department of Physiological Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Christina Gladkova

    Biomedical Center Munich, Department of Physiological Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Koyeli Mapa

    Biomedical Center Munich, Department of Physiological Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Gregor Witte

    Gene Center, Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Dejana Mokranjac

    Biomedical Center Munich, Department of Physiological Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
    For correspondence
    dejana.mokranjac@med.uni-muenchen.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Nikolaus Pfanner, Univ. of Freiburg, Germany

Version history

  1. Received: September 26, 2015
  2. Accepted: December 28, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 29, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 1, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Banerjee et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,277
    views
  • 462
    downloads
  • 43
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rupa Banerjee
  2. Christina Gladkova
  3. Koyeli Mapa
  4. Gregor Witte
  5. Dejana Mokranjac
(2015)
Protein translocation channel of mitochondrial inner membrane and matrix-exposed import motor communicate via two-domain coupling protein
eLife 4:e11897.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11897

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11897

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Damien M Rasmussen, Manny M Semonis ... Nicholas M Levinson
    Research Article

    The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.