Microbiota-driven transcriptional changes in prefrontal cortex override genetic differences in social behavior

  1. Mar Gacias  Is a corresponding author
  2. Sevasti Gaspari
  3. Patricia Mae G Santos
  4. Sabrina Tamburini
  5. Monica Andrade
  6. Fan Zang
  7. Nan Shen
  8. Vladimir Tolstikov
  9. Michael A Kiebish
  10. Jeffrey L Dupree
  11. Venetia Zachariou
  12. Jose C Clemente
  13. Patrizia Casaccia
  1. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
  2. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaii, United States
  3. BERG, United States
  4. Virginia Commonwealth University, United States

Abstract

Gene-environment interactions impact the development of neuropsychiatric disorders, but the relative contributions are unclear. Here, we identify gut microbiota as sufficient to induce depressive-like behaviors in genetically distinct mouse strains. Daily gavage of saline in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice induced a social avoidance behavior that was not observed in C57BL/6 mice. This was not observed in NOD animals with depleted microbiota via oral administration of antibiotics. Transfer of intestinal microbiota, including members of the Clostridiales, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae, from vehicle-gavaged NOD donors to microbiota-depleted C57BL/6 recipients was sufficient to induce social avoidance and change gene expression and myelination in the prefrontal cortex. Metabolomic analysis identified increased cresol levels in these mice, and exposure of cultured oligodendrocytes to this metabolite prevented myelin gene expression and differentiation. Our results thus demonstrate that the gut microbiota modifies the synthesis of key metabolites affecting gene expression in the prefrontal cortex, thereby modulating social behavior.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mar Gacias

    Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    mar.gacias-monserrat@mssm.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sevasti Gaspari

    Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Patricia Mae G Santos

    Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sabrina Tamburini

    Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Monica Andrade

    Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Fan Zang

    Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaii, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Nan Shen

    Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Vladimir Tolstikov

    BERG, Framingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Michael A Kiebish

    BERG, Framingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jeffrey L Dupree

    Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Venetia Zachariou

    Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jose C Clemente

    Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Patrizia Casaccia

    Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Peggy Mason, University of Chicago, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (#08-0676, #08-0675; LA10-00398; LA12-00193; LA12-00146).

Version history

  1. Received: December 3, 2015
  2. Accepted: April 7, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 20, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: May 3, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: May 16, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2016, Gacias et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,392
    views
  • 2,731
    downloads
  • 217
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mar Gacias
  2. Sevasti Gaspari
  3. Patricia Mae G Santos
  4. Sabrina Tamburini
  5. Monica Andrade
  6. Fan Zang
  7. Nan Shen
  8. Vladimir Tolstikov
  9. Michael A Kiebish
  10. Jeffrey L Dupree
  11. Venetia Zachariou
  12. Jose C Clemente
  13. Patrizia Casaccia
(2016)
Microbiota-driven transcriptional changes in prefrontal cortex override genetic differences in social behavior
eLife 5:e13442.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13442

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13442

Further reading

  1. Microbes in the gut influence the social behaviour of mice.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.