Abstract

Human calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that maintains extracellular Ca2+ homeostasis through the regulation of parathyroid hormone secretion. It functions as a disulfide-tethered homodimer composed of three main domains, the Venus Flytrap module, cysteine-rich domain, and seven-helix transmembrane region. Here we present the crystal structures of the entire extracellular domain of CaSR in the resting and active conformations. We provide direct evidence that L-amino acids are agonists of the receptor. In the active structure, L-Trp occupies the orthosteric agonist-binding site at the interdomain cleft, and is primarily responsible for inducing extracellular domain closure to initiate receptor activation. Our structures reveal multiple binding sites for Ca2+ and PO43- ions. Both ions are crucial for structural integrity of the receptor. While Ca2+ ions stabilize the active state, PO43- ions reinforce the inactive conformation. The activation mechanism of CaSR involves the formation of a novel dimer interface between subunits.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yong Geng

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lidia Mosyak

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Igor Kurinov

    Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hao Zuo

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Emmanuel Sturchler

    Department of Molecular Therapeutics, The Scripps Translational Science Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tat Cheung Cheng

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Prakash Subramanyam

    Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Alice P Brown

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Sarah C Brennan

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Hee-chang Mun

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Martin Bush

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yan Chen

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Trang X Nguyen

    Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Baohua Cao

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Donald D Chang

    Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Matthias Quick

    Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Arthur D Conigrave

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Henry M Colecraft

    Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Patricia McDonald

    Department of Molecular Therapeutics, The Scripps Translational Science Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Qing R Fan

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    qf13@cumc.columbia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9330-0963

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM112973)

  • Qing R Fan

American Heart Association (15GRNT25420002)

  • Qing R Fan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ehud Y Isacoff, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Version history

  1. Received: December 9, 2015
  2. Accepted: July 18, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 19, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 8, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Geng et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,412
    views
  • 1,562
    downloads
  • 186
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yong Geng
  2. Lidia Mosyak
  3. Igor Kurinov
  4. Hao Zuo
  5. Emmanuel Sturchler
  6. Tat Cheung Cheng
  7. Prakash Subramanyam
  8. Alice P Brown
  9. Sarah C Brennan
  10. Hee-chang Mun
  11. Martin Bush
  12. Yan Chen
  13. Trang X Nguyen
  14. Baohua Cao
  15. Donald D Chang
  16. Matthias Quick
  17. Arthur D Conigrave
  18. Henry M Colecraft
  19. Patricia McDonald
  20. Qing R Fan
(2016)
Structural mechanism of ligand activation in human calcium-sensing receptor
eLife 5:e13662.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13662

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13662

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Damien M Rasmussen, Manny M Semonis ... Nicholas M Levinson
    Research Article

    The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Nicholas James Ose, Paul Campitelli ... Sefika Banu Ozkan
    Research Article

    We integrate evolutionary predictions based on the neutral theory of molecular evolution with protein dynamics to generate mechanistic insight into the molecular adaptations of the SARS-COV-2 spike (S) protein. With this approach, we first identified candidate adaptive polymorphisms (CAPs) of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and assessed the impact of these CAPs through dynamics analysis. Not only have we found that CAPs frequently overlap with well-known functional sites, but also, using several different dynamics-based metrics, we reveal the critical allosteric interplay between SARS-CoV-2 CAPs and the S protein binding sites with the human ACE2 (hACE2) protein. CAPs interact far differently with the hACE2 binding site residues in the open conformation of the S protein compared to the closed form. In particular, the CAP sites control the dynamics of binding residues in the open state, suggesting an allosteric control of hACE2 binding. We also explored the characteristic mutations of different SARS-CoV-2 strains to find dynamic hallmarks and potential effects of future mutations. Our analyses reveal that Delta strain-specific variants have non-additive (i.e., epistatic) interactions with CAP sites, whereas the less pathogenic Omicron strains have mostly additive mutations. Finally, our dynamics-based analysis suggests that the novel mutations observed in the Omicron strain epistatically interact with the CAP sites to help escape antibody binding.