Secretion of protein disulphide isomerase AGR2 confers tumorigenic properties

  1. Delphine Fessart  Is a corresponding author
  2. Charlotte Domblides
  3. Tony Avril
  4. Leif A Eriksson
  5. Hugues Begueret
  6. Raphael Pineau
  7. Camille Malrieux
  8. Nathalie Dugot-Senant
  9. Carlo Lucchesi
  10. Eric Chevet
  11. Frederic Delom
  1. Université de Bordeaux, France
  2. University of Rennes 1, France
  3. University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  4. Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, France
  5. Bergonié Cancer Institute, France

Abstract

The extracellular matrix (ECM) plays an instrumental role in determining the spatial orientation of epithelial polarity and the formation of lumens in glandular tissues during morphogenesis. Here, we show that the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER)-resident protein anterior gradient-2 (AGR2), a soluble protein-disulfide isomerase involved in ER protein folding and quality control, is secreted and interacts with the ECM. Extracellular AGR2 (eAGR2) is a microenvironmental regulator of epithelial tissue architecture, which plays a role in the preneoplastic phenotype and contributes to epithelial tumorigenicity. Indeed, eAGR2, is secreted as a functionally active protein independently of its thioredoxin-like domain (CXXS) and of its ER-retention domain (KTEL), and is sufficient, by itself, to promote the acquisition of invasive and metastatic features. Therefore, we conclude that eAGR2 plays an extracellular role independent of its ER function and we elucidate this gain-of-function as a novel and unexpected critical ECM microenvironmental pro-oncogenic regulator of epithelial morphogenesis and tumorigenesis.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Delphine Fessart

    Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    For correspondence
    delphine.fessart@yahoo.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Charlotte Domblides

    Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Tony Avril

    Oncogenesis, Stress, Signaling, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Leif A Eriksson

    Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Hugues Begueret

    Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Raphael Pineau

    Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Camille Malrieux

    Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Nathalie Dugot-Senant

    Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Carlo Lucchesi

    Bergonié Cancer Institute, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Eric Chevet

    Oncogenesis, Stress, Signaling, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Frederic Delom

    Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Johanna Ivaska, University of Turku, Finland

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures met the European Community Directive guidelines (Agreement B33-522-2/ Number DIR 1322) and were approved by the ethical committee from Bordeaux University.

Human subjects: Samples of human lung cancer tissues were obtained from the Haut-Leveque University Hospital (Bordeaux, France) and reviewed by expert pathologist in the field (H. Begueret). These procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at Haut-Leveque (NFS96900 Certification).

Version history

  1. Received: December 17, 2015
  2. Accepted: May 28, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 30, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 11, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Fessart et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,101
    views
  • 1,242
    downloads
  • 65
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Delphine Fessart
  2. Charlotte Domblides
  3. Tony Avril
  4. Leif A Eriksson
  5. Hugues Begueret
  6. Raphael Pineau
  7. Camille Malrieux
  8. Nathalie Dugot-Senant
  9. Carlo Lucchesi
  10. Eric Chevet
  11. Frederic Delom
(2016)
Secretion of protein disulphide isomerase AGR2 confers tumorigenic properties
eLife 5:e13887.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13887

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13887

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Samuel Pawel, Rachel Heyard ... Leonhard Held
    Research Article

    In several large-scale replication projects, statistically non-significant results in both the original and the replication study have been interpreted as a ‘replication success.’ Here, we discuss the logical problems with this approach: Non-significance in both studies does not ensure that the studies provide evidence for the absence of an effect and ‘replication success’ can virtually always be achieved if the sample sizes are small enough. In addition, the relevant error rates are not controlled. We show how methods, such as equivalence testing and Bayes factors, can be used to adequately quantify the evidence for the absence of an effect and how they can be applied in the replication setting. Using data from the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, the Experimental Philosophy Replicability Project, and the Reproducibility Project: Psychology we illustrate that many original and replication studies with ‘null results’ are in fact inconclusive. We conclude that it is important to also replicate studies with statistically non-significant results, but that they should be designed, analyzed, and interpreted appropriately.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Savvas Nikolaou, Amelie Juin ... Laura M Machesky
    Research Article

    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis, with high rates of metastasis and few treatment options. Hyperactivation of KRAS in almost all tumours drives RAC1 activation, conferring enhanced migratory and proliferative capacity as well as macropinocytosis. Macropinocytosis is well understood as a nutrient scavenging mechanism, but little is known about its functions in trafficking of signaling receptors. We find that CYRI-B is highly expressed in pancreatic tumours in a mouse model of KRAS and p53-driven pancreatic cancer. Deletion of Cyrib (the gene encoding CYRI-B protein) accelerates tumourigenesis, leading to enhanced ERK and JNK-induced proliferation in precancerous lesions, indicating a potential role as a buffer of RAC1 hyperactivation in early stages. However, as disease progresses, loss of CYRI-B inhibits metastasis. CYRI-B depleted tumour cells show reduced chemotactic responses to lysophosphatidic acid, a major driver of tumour spread, due to impaired macropinocytic uptake of the lysophosphatidic acid receptor-1. Overall, we implicate CYRI-B as a mediator of growth and signaling in pancreatic cancer, providing new insights into pathways controlling metastasis.