Autoimmune Disorders: Thinking differently about lupus
- Genentech Inc., United States
It is always exciting when a new study opens up a whole new way of thinking about a scientific problem. This is especially true if the problem is a health condition that is both poorly understood and incurable. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system attacks healthy tissue – including the skin, joints and many internal organs – by mistake. Moreover, the underlying causes of the disease are not fully understood, so available treatments only tackle its symptoms. Now, in eLife, Patrick Gaffney, Edward Wakeland and colleagues – who include Prithvi Raj and Ekta Rai as joint first authors – report an extensive sequencing study of over 1,000 people with SLE that provides many new insights into the genetics of lupus (Raj et al., 2016).
The researchers – who are based at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation and other centers in the United States, Belgium and India – focused on 16 regions of the human genome that are known to influence a person’s risk of SLE. Their findings highlight the complexity of the changes in the genome that can predispose someone to develop SLE. Amongst the treasure-trove of data is one gold nugget that stands apart: the discovery that the expression level of the so-called Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class II genes contributes to risk of the disease. This is an entirely new twist on an old story.
The HLA genes are found in a long stretch of DNA on chromosome 6 that contains more than 140 protein-coding genes, many of which are important for immune responses (MHC Sequencing Consortium, 1999; de Bakker et al., 2006). The class I genes encode proteins that are found on the outer membrane of all cells, whereas the class II genes encode proteins found only on specialized immune cells called antigen-presenting cells. In both cases, these proteins bind to small fragments of other proteins and then display them to the immune system. Class I proteins display fragments from within our own cells and protect us from cancer, viral infections and certain bacteria that can live within our cells. Class II proteins, on the other hand, display fragments from foreign invaders and are important for instructing the immune system to mount neutralizing responses to parasites and bacteria that live outside of cells.
The HLA class I and II genes are amongst the most variable DNA sequences in the human genome. There are more than 8,000 different variants, or alleles, of class I genes and more than 2,500 class II alleles (Robinson et al., 2015). These alleles encode slightly different proteins, each with the potential to bind to, and display, different protein fragments.
Hundreds of studies have previously linked class I and II variants with the risk of specific diseases and, without exception, these studies have emphasized the sequence diversity of class I and II genes as the important factor (Welter et al., 2014. For example, individuals who carry the class I allele known as B27 are strongly predisposed to developing a type of arthritis called ankylosing spondylitis, whereas people without the B27 allele appear to be protected against the disease (Caffrey and James, 1973).
The new findings show that the HLA class II alleles conferring risk for SLE encode proteins that are found in greater numbers on the surface of antigen-presenting cells than those encoded by alleles that do not increase the risk (Raj et al., 2016). These data suggest, for the first time, that the abundance of class II proteins on antigen-presenting cells could strongly influence risk of certain diseases.
It remains to be determined how differences in the abundance of class II molecules translate to increased disease risk. Higher levels of class II molecules on antigen-presenting cells could increase the chances that circulating immune cells bind to these molecules, and lead to more efficient immune and autoimmune responses. Another possibility is that the extra class II proteins on antigen-presenting cells could adversely affect a developmental process that would normally eliminate those immune cells that have the potential to cause autoimmune disorders.
Further studies now need to extend the analysis of Raj, Rai et al. to the other major class II alleles that are associated with disease in humans. It will also be important to see if this paradigm extends to the class I alleles. These studies will improve our understanding of the earliest events in autoimmunity and hopefully lead to new treatment options for autoimmune disorders.
References
-
The IPD and IMGT/HLA database: allele variant databasesNucleic Acids Research 43:D423–431.https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1161
-
The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associationsNucleic Acids Research 42:D1001–D1006.https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1229
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
- Version of Record published: March 29, 2016 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2016, Wuster et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,209
- views
-
- 164
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Autoimmune Disorders: Thinking differently about lupus
eLife 5:e15352.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15352
Further reading
-
- Genetics and Genomics
Uncovering the regulators of cellular aging will unravel the complexity of aging biology and identify potential therapeutic interventions to delay the onset and progress of chronic, aging-related diseases. In this work, we systematically compared genesets involved in regulating the lifespan of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (a powerful model organism to study the cellular aging of humans) and those with expression changes under rapamycin treatment. Among the functionally uncharacterized genes in the overlap set, YBR238C stood out as the only one downregulated by rapamycin and with an increased chronological and replicative lifespan upon deletion. We show that YBR238C and its paralog RMD9 oppositely affect mitochondria and aging. YBR238C deletion increases the cellular lifespan by enhancing mitochondrial function. Its overexpression accelerates cellular aging via mitochondrial dysfunction. We find that the phenotypic effect of YBR238C is largely explained by HAP4- and RMD9-dependent mechanisms. Furthermore, we find that genetic- or chemical-based induction of mitochondrial dysfunction increases TORC1 (Target of Rapamycin Complex 1) activity that, subsequently, accelerates cellular aging. Notably, TORC1 inhibition by rapamycin (or deletion of YBR238C) improves the shortened lifespan under these mitochondrial dysfunction conditions in yeast and human cells. The growth of mutant cells (a proxy of TORC1 activity) with enhanced mitochondrial function is sensitive to rapamycin whereas the growth of defective mitochondrial mutants is largely resistant to rapamycin compared to wild type. Our findings demonstrate a feedback loop between TORC1 and mitochondria (the TORC1–MItochondria–TORC1 (TOMITO) signaling process) that regulates cellular aging processes. Hereby, YBR238C is an effector of TORC1 modulating mitochondrial function.
-
- Genetics and Genomics
- Neuroscience
Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) and hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HGPRT) are two structurally related enzymes involved in purine recycling in humans. Inherited mutations that suppress HGPRT activity are associated with Lesch–Nyhan disease (LND), a rare X-linked metabolic and neurological disorder in children, characterized by hyperuricemia, dystonia, and compulsive self-injury. To date, no treatment is available for these neurological defects and no animal model recapitulates all symptoms of LND patients. Here, we studied LND-related mechanisms in the fruit fly. By combining enzymatic assays and phylogenetic analysis, we confirm that no HGPRT activity is expressed in Drosophila melanogaster, making the APRT homolog (Aprt) the only purine-recycling enzyme in this organism. Whereas APRT deficiency does not trigger neurological defects in humans, we observed that Drosophila Aprt mutants show both metabolic and neurobehavioral disturbances, including increased uric acid levels, locomotor impairments, sleep alterations, seizure-like behavior, reduced lifespan, and reduction of adenosine signaling and content. Locomotor defects could be rescued by Aprt re-expression in neurons and reproduced by knocking down Aprt selectively in the protocerebral anterior medial (PAM) dopaminergic neurons, the mushroom bodies, or glia subsets. Ingestion of allopurinol rescued uric acid levels in Aprt-deficient mutants but not neurological defects, as is the case in LND patients, while feeding adenosine or N6-methyladenosine (m6A) during development fully rescued the epileptic behavior. Intriguingly, pan-neuronal expression of an LND-associated mutant form of human HGPRT (I42T), but not the wild-type enzyme, resulted in early locomotor defects and seizure in flies, similar to Aprt deficiency. Overall, our results suggest that Drosophila could be used in different ways to better understand LND and seek a cure for this dramatic disease.
