Abstract

TRIM5 proteins are restriction factors that block retroviral infections by binding viral capsids and preventing reverse transcription. Capsid recognition is mediated by C-terminal domains on TRIM5α (SPRY) or TRIMCyp (cyclophilin A), which interact weakly with capsids. Efficient capsid recognition also requires the conserved N-terminal tripartite motifs (TRIM), which mediate oligomerization and create avidity effects. To characterize how TRIM5 proteins recognize viral capsids, we developed methods for isolating native recombinant TRIM5 proteins and purifying stable HIV-1 capsids. Biochemical and EM analyses revealed that TRIM5 proteins assembled into hexagonal nets, both alone and on capsid surfaces. These nets comprised open hexameric rings, with the SPRY domains centered on the edges and the B-box and RING domains at the vertices. Thus, the principles of hexagonal TRIM5 assembly and capsid pattern recognition are conserved across primates, allowing TRIM5 assemblies to maintain the conformational plasticity necessary to recognize divergent and pleomorphic retroviral capsids.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yen-Li Li

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Viswanathan Chandrasekaran

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Stephen D Carter

    Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Cora L Woodward

    Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Devin E Christensen

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Kelly A Dryden

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Owen Pornillos

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Mark Yeager

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Barbie K Ganser-Pornillos

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Grant J Jensen

    Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Wesley I Sundquist

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    For correspondence
    wes@biochem.utah.edu
    Competing interests
    Wesley I Sundquist, Reviewing editor, eLife.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Stephen P Goff, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: March 22, 2016
  2. Accepted: May 19, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 2, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: June 3, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: July 7, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2016, Li et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,796
    views
  • 958
    downloads
  • 82
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yen-Li Li
  2. Viswanathan Chandrasekaran
  3. Stephen D Carter
  4. Cora L Woodward
  5. Devin E Christensen
  6. Kelly A Dryden
  7. Owen Pornillos
  8. Mark Yeager
  9. Barbie K Ganser-Pornillos
  10. Grant J Jensen
  11. Wesley I Sundquist
(2016)
Primate TRIM5 proteins form hexagonal nets 1 on HIV-1 capsids
eLife 5:e16269.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16269

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16269

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Jeremy Luban
    Insight

    Structural studies reveal how an antiviral factor forms a molecular net to restrict retroviruses including HIV-1.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Tobias Weinberger, Messerer Denise ... Christian Schulz
    Research Article

    Cardiac macrophages are heterogenous in phenotype and functions, which has been associated with differences in their ontogeny. Despite extensive research, our understanding of the precise role of different subsets of macrophages in ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury remains incomplete. We here investigated macrophage lineages and ablated tissue macrophages in homeostasis and after I/R injury in a CSF1R-dependent manner. Genomic deletion of a fms-intronic regulatory element (FIRE) in the Csf1r locus resulted in specific absence of resident homeostatic and antigen-presenting macrophages, without affecting the recruitment of monocyte-derived macrophages to the infarcted heart. Specific absence of homeostatic, monocyte-independent macrophages altered the immune cell crosstalk in response to injury and induced proinflammatory neutrophil polarization, resulting in impaired cardiac remodeling without influencing infarct size. In contrast, continuous CSF1R inhibition led to depletion of both resident and recruited macrophage populations. This augmented adverse remodeling after I/R and led to an increased infarct size and deterioration of cardiac function. In summary, resident macrophages orchestrate inflammatory responses improving cardiac remodeling, while recruited macrophages determine infarct size after I/R injury. These findings attribute distinct beneficial effects to different macrophage populations in the context of myocardial infarction.