Subretinal mononuclear phagocytes induce cone segment loss via IL-1β

  1. Chiara M Eandi
  2. Hugo Charles Messance
  3. Sébastien Augustin
  4. Elisa Dominguez
  5. Sophie Lavalette
  6. Valérie Forster  Is a corresponding author
  7. Shulong Justin Hu
  8. Lourdes Siquieros
  9. Cheryl Mae Craft
  10. José-Alain Sahel
  11. Ramin Tadayoni
  12. Michel Paques
  13. Xavier Guillonneau
  14. Florian Sennlaub  Is a corresponding author
  1. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, France
  2. Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, United States

Abstract

Photo-transduction in cone segments (CS) is crucial for high acuity daytime vision. For ill-defined reasons, CS degenerate in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and in the transitional zone (TZ) of atrophic zones (AZ), which characterize geographic atrophy (GA). Our experiments confirm the loss of cone segments (CS) in the TZ of GA patients and show their association with subretinal CD14+mononuclear phagocyte (MP) infiltration that is also reported in RP. Using human and mouse MPs in vitro and inflammation-prone Cx3cr1GFP/GFP mice in vivo, we demonstrate that MP derived IL-1β leads to severe CS degeneration. Our results strongly suggest that subretinal MP accumulation participates in the observed pathological photoreceptor changes in these diseases. Inhibiting subretinal MP accumulation or Il-1β might protect the CS and help preserve high acuity daytime vision in conditions characterized by subretinal inflammation, such as AMD and RP.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chiara M Eandi

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3656-1689
  2. Hugo Charles Messance

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sébastien Augustin

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Elisa Dominguez

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sophie Lavalette

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Valérie Forster

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    valerie.fradot@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shulong Justin Hu

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Lourdes Siquieros

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Cheryl Mae Craft

    Mary D. Allen Laboratory for Vision Research, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los ANgeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. José-Alain Sahel

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ramin Tadayoni

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Michel Paques

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Xavier Guillonneau

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7379-3935
  14. Florian Sennlaub

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    florian.sennlaub@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4412-1341

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (MACLEAR)

  • Sébastien Augustin
  • Elisa Dominguez
  • Sophie Lavalette
  • Shulong Justin Hu
  • Lourdes Siquieros
  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Michel Paques
  • Xavier Guillonneau
  • Florian Sennlaub

Labex (lifescience)

  • Chiara M Eandi
  • Hugo Charles Messance
  • Sébastien Augustin
  • Elisa Dominguez
  • Sophie Lavalette
  • Shulong Justin Hu
  • Lourdes Siquieros
  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Ramin Tadayoni
  • Michel Paques
  • Xavier Guillonneau
  • Florian Sennlaub

adps-allianz

  • Chiara M Eandi
  • Hugo Charles Messance
  • Sébastien Augustin
  • Elisa Dominguez
  • Sophie Lavalette
  • Shulong Justin Hu
  • Lourdes Siquieros
  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Ramin Tadayoni
  • Michel Paques
  • Xavier Guillonneau
  • Florian Sennlaub

National Institutes of Health (EY015851)

  • Cheryl Mae Craft

National Institutes of Health (EY03040)

  • Cheryl Mae Craft

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jeremy Nathans, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental protocols and procedures were approved by the local animal care ethics committee (00156.02; C 92-032-02 )

Human subjects: Volunteers provided written and informed consent for the human monocyte expression studies, which were approved by the Centre national d'ophthalmologie des Quinze-Vingt hospital (Paris, France) ethics committees (no. 913572)

Version history

  1. Received: April 2, 2016
  2. Accepted: July 19, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 20, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 1, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Eandi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,488
    views
  • 317
    downloads
  • 61
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Chiara M Eandi
  2. Hugo Charles Messance
  3. Sébastien Augustin
  4. Elisa Dominguez
  5. Sophie Lavalette
  6. Valérie Forster
  7. Shulong Justin Hu
  8. Lourdes Siquieros
  9. Cheryl Mae Craft
  10. José-Alain Sahel
  11. Ramin Tadayoni
  12. Michel Paques
  13. Xavier Guillonneau
  14. Florian Sennlaub
(2016)
Subretinal mononuclear phagocytes induce cone segment loss via IL-1β
eLife 5:e16490.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16490

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16490

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Kenta Abe, Yuki Kambe ... Tatsuo Sato
    Research Article

    Midbrain dopamine neurons impact neural processing in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) through mesocortical projections. However, the signals conveyed by dopamine projections to the PFC remain unclear, particularly at the single-axon level. Here, we investigated dopaminergic axonal activity in the medial PFC (mPFC) during reward and aversive processing. By optimizing microprism-mediated two-photon calcium imaging of dopamine axon terminals, we found diverse activity in dopamine axons responsive to both reward and aversive stimuli. Some axons exhibited a preference for reward, while others favored aversive stimuli, and there was a strong bias for the latter at the population level. Long-term longitudinal imaging revealed that the preference was maintained in reward- and aversive-preferring axons throughout classical conditioning in which rewarding and aversive stimuli were paired with preceding auditory cues. However, as mice learned to discriminate reward or aversive cues, a cue activity preference gradually developed only in aversive-preferring axons. We inferred the trial-by-trial cue discrimination based on machine learning using anticipatory licking or facial expressions, and found that successful discrimination was accompanied by sharper selectivity for the aversive cue in aversive-preferring axons. Our findings indicate that a group of mesocortical dopamine axons encodes aversive-related signals, which are modulated by both classical conditioning across days and trial-by-trial discrimination within a day.

    1. Neuroscience
    Baiwei Liu, Zampeta-Sofia Alexopoulou, Freek van Ede
    Research Article

    Working memory enables us to bridge past sensory information to upcoming future behaviour. Accordingly, by its very nature, working memory is concerned with two components: the past and the future. Yet, in conventional laboratory tasks, these two components are often conflated, such as when sensory information in working memory is encoded and tested at the same location. We developed a task in which we dissociated the past (encoded location) and future (to-be-tested location) attributes of visual contents in working memory. This enabled us to independently track the utilisation of past and future memory attributes through gaze, as observed during mnemonic selection. Our results reveal the joint consideration of past and future locations. This was prevalent even at the single-trial level of individual saccades that were jointly biased to the past and future. This uncovers the rich nature of working memory representations, whereby both past and future memory attributes are retained and can be accessed together when memory contents become relevant for behaviour.