Ribosome•RelA structures reveal the mechanism of stringent response activation
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States
- Mayo Medical School, United States
- Brandeis University, United States
Abstract
Stringent response is a conserved bacterial stress response underlying virulence and antibiotic resistance. RelA/SpoT-homolog proteins synthesize transcriptional modulators (p)ppGpp, allowing bacteria to adapt to stresses. RelA is activated during amino-acid starvation, when cognate deacyl-tRNA binds to the ribosomal A (aminoacyl-tRNA) site. We report four cryo-EM structures of E. coli RelA bound to the 70S ribosome, in the absence and presence of deacyl-tRNA accommodating in the 30S A site. The boomerang-shaped RelA with a wingspan of more than 100 Å wraps around the A/R (30S A-site/RelA-bound) tRNA. The CCA end of the A/R tRNA pins the central TGS domain against the 30S subunit, presenting the (p)ppGpp-synthetase domain near the 30S spur. The ribosome and A/R tRNA are captured in three conformations, revealing hitherto elusive states of tRNA engagement with the ribosomal decoding center. Decoding-center rearrangements are coupled with the step-wise 30S-subunit 'closure', providing insights into the dynamics of high-fidelity tRNA decoding.
Data availability
-
Structure of RelA bound to ribosome in absence of A/R tRNA (Structure I)Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5KPS).
-
Structure of RelA bound to ribosome in presence of A/R tRNA (Structure II)Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5KPV).
-
Structure of RelA bound to ribosome in presence of A/R tRNA (Structure III)Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5KPW).
-
Structure of RelA bound to ribosome in presence of A/R tRNA (Structure IV)Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5KPX).
Article and author information
Author details
Nikolaus Grigorieff
Andrei A Korostelev
Funding
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Nikolaus Grigorieff
National Institutes of Health (RO1 GM106105)
- Andrei A Korostelev
National Institutes of Health (PO1 GM62580)
- Nikolaus Grigorieff
Helen Hay Whitney Foundation
- Anna B Loveland
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Rachel Green, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, United States
Version history
- Received: April 18, 2016
- Accepted: July 18, 2016
- Accepted Manuscript published: July 19, 2016 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: August 4, 2016 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2016, Loveland et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 5,261
- views
-
- 901
- downloads
-
- 129
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Ribosome•RelA structures reveal the mechanism of stringent response activation
eLife 5:e17029.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17029
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.
-
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
We integrate evolutionary predictions based on the neutral theory of molecular evolution with protein dynamics to generate mechanistic insight into the molecular adaptations of the SARS-COV-2 spike (S) protein. With this approach, we first identified candidate adaptive polymorphisms (CAPs) of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and assessed the impact of these CAPs through dynamics analysis. Not only have we found that CAPs frequently overlap with well-known functional sites, but also, using several different dynamics-based metrics, we reveal the critical allosteric interplay between SARS-CoV-2 CAPs and the S protein binding sites with the human ACE2 (hACE2) protein. CAPs interact far differently with the hACE2 binding site residues in the open conformation of the S protein compared to the closed form. In particular, the CAP sites control the dynamics of binding residues in the open state, suggesting an allosteric control of hACE2 binding. We also explored the characteristic mutations of different SARS-CoV-2 strains to find dynamic hallmarks and potential effects of future mutations. Our analyses reveal that Delta strain-specific variants have non-additive (i.e., epistatic) interactions with CAP sites, whereas the less pathogenic Omicron strains have mostly additive mutations. Finally, our dynamics-based analysis suggests that the novel mutations observed in the Omicron strain epistatically interact with the CAP sites to help escape antibody binding.
