Combined ALK and MDM2 inhibition increases antitumor activity and overcomes resistance in human ALK mutant neuroblastoma cell lines and xenograft models

  1. Hui Qin Wang
  2. Ensar Halilovic
  3. Xiaoyan Li
  4. Jinsheng Liang
  5. Yichen Cao
  6. Daniel P Rakiec
  7. David A Ruddy
  8. Sebastien Jeay
  9. Jens U Wuerthner
  10. Noelito Timple
  11. Shailaja Kasibhatla
  12. Nanxin Li
  13. Juliet A Williams
  14. William R Sellers
  15. Alan Huang
  16. Fang Li  Is a corresponding author
  1. Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, United States
  2. Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Switzerland
  3. Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, United States

Abstract

The efficacy of ALK inhibitors in patients with ALK-mutant neuroblastoma is limited, highlighting the need to improve their effectiveness in these patients. To this end we sought to develop a combination strategy to enhance the antitumor activity of ALK inhibitor monotherapy in human neuroblastoma cell lines and xenograft models expressing activated ALK. Herein, we report that combined inhibition of ALK and MDM2 induced a complementary set of anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic proteins. Consequently, this combination treatment synergistically inhibited proliferation of TP53 wild-type neuroblastoma cells harboring ALK amplification or mutations in vitro, and resulted in complete and durable responses in neuroblastoma xenografts derived from these cells. We further demonstrate that concurrent inhibition of MDM2 and ALK was able to overcome ceritinib resistance conferred by MYCN upregulation in vitro and in vivo. Together, combined inhibition of ALK and MDM2 may provide an effective treatment for TP53 wild-type neuroblastoma with ALK aberrations.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hui Qin Wang

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ensar Halilovic

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Xiaoyan Li

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jinsheng Liang

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yichen Cao

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Daniel P Rakiec

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. David A Ruddy

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sebastien Jeay

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jens U Wuerthner

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Noelito Timple

    Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Shailaja Kasibhatla

    Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Nanxin Li

    Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Juliet A Williams

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. William R Sellers

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Alan Huang

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Fang Li

    Disease Area Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    fli@tangotx.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0497-4200

Funding

Novartis

  • Fang Li

The research was funded by Novartis, Inc., where all authors were employees at the time the study was conducted. The authors declare no other competing financial interests.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Chi Van Dang, University of Pennsylvania, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All in vivo studies were reviewed and approved by the Novartis Institutes of Biomedical Research Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations.If needed, a letter from the IACUC Chair can be provided to confirm that all in vivo studies were reviewed and approved by the Novartis IACUC. Below is the contact of the Novartis IACUC Chair.CeCe Brotchie-Fine, MA, CPIAManager, Animal Welfare ComplianceIACUC Chair & Animal Welfare OfficerT +1 617 871 5064M+1 617 834 4784Email: Candice.brotchie-fine@novartis.comNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Inc.700 Main Street, 460 ACambridge, MA 02139 USA

Version history

  1. Received: April 23, 2016
  2. Accepted: April 18, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 20, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 17, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Wang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,506
    views
  • 475
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hui Qin Wang
  2. Ensar Halilovic
  3. Xiaoyan Li
  4. Jinsheng Liang
  5. Yichen Cao
  6. Daniel P Rakiec
  7. David A Ruddy
  8. Sebastien Jeay
  9. Jens U Wuerthner
  10. Noelito Timple
  11. Shailaja Kasibhatla
  12. Nanxin Li
  13. Juliet A Williams
  14. William R Sellers
  15. Alan Huang
  16. Fang Li
(2017)
Combined ALK and MDM2 inhibition increases antitumor activity and overcomes resistance in human ALK mutant neuroblastoma cell lines and xenograft models
eLife 6:e17137.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17137

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17137

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Ting Zhang, Alisa Ambrodji ... Steven M Offer
    Research Article

    Enhancers are critical for regulating tissue-specific gene expression, and genetic variants within enhancer regions have been suggested to contribute to various cancer-related processes, including therapeutic resistance. However, the precise mechanisms remain elusive. Using a well-defined drug-gene pair, we identified an enhancer region for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, DPYD gene) expression that is relevant to the metabolism of the anti-cancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Using reporter systems, CRISPR genome-edited cell models, and human liver specimens, we demonstrated in vitro and vivo that genotype status for the common germline variant (rs4294451; 27% global minor allele frequency) located within this novel enhancer controls DPYD transcription and alters resistance to 5-FU. The variant genotype increases recruitment of the transcription factor CEBPB to the enhancer and alters the level of direct interactions between the enhancer and DPYD promoter. Our data provide insight into the regulatory mechanisms controlling sensitivity and resistance to 5-FU.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Lijun Bian, Zhimin Ma ... Guangfu Jin
    Research Article

    Background:

    Age is the most important risk factor for cancer, but aging rates are heterogeneous across individuals. We explored a new measure of aging-Phenotypic Age (PhenoAge)-in the risk prediction of site-specific and overall cancer.

    Methods:

    Using Cox regression models, we examined the association of Phenotypic Age Acceleration (PhenoAgeAccel) with cancer incidence by genetic risk group among 374,463 participants from the UK Biobank. We generated PhenoAge using chronological age and nine biomarkers, PhenoAgeAccel after subtracting the effect of chronological age by regression residual, and an incidence-weighted overall cancer polygenic risk score (CPRS) based on 20 cancer site-specific polygenic risk scores (PRSs).

    Results:

    Compared with biologically younger participants, those older had a significantly higher risk of overall cancer, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.22 (95% confidence interval, 1.18–1.27) in men, and 1.26 (1.22–1.31) in women, respectively. A joint effect of genetic risk and PhenoAgeAccel was observed on overall cancer risk, with HRs of 2.29 (2.10–2.51) for men and 1.94 (1.78–2.11) for women with high genetic risk and older PhenoAge compared with those with low genetic risk and younger PhenoAge. PhenoAgeAccel was negatively associated with the number of healthy lifestyle factors (Beta = –1.01 in men, p<0.001; Beta = –0.98 in women, p<0.001).

    Conclusions:

    Within and across genetic risk groups, older PhenoAge was consistently related to an increased risk of incident cancer with adjustment for chronological age and the aging process could be retarded by adherence to a healthy lifestyle.

    Funding:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82230110, 82125033, 82388102 to GJ; 82273714 to MZ); and the Excellent Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20220100 to MZ).