Satb2 determines miRNA expression and long-term memory in the adult central nervous system

  1. Clemens Jaitner
  2. Chethan Reddy
  3. Andreas Abentung
  4. Nigel Whittle
  5. Dietmar Rieder
  6. Andrea Delekate
  7. Martin Korte
  8. Gaurav Jain
  9. Andre Fischer
  10. Farahnaz Sananbenesi
  11. Isabella Cera
  12. Nicolas Singewald
  13. Georg Dechant  Is a corresponding author
  14. Galina Apostolova  Is a corresponding author
  1. Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
  2. University of Innsbruck, Austria
  3. Technical University Braunschweig, Germany
  4. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Germany

Abstract

SATB2 is a risk locus for schizophrenia and encodes a DNA-binding protein that regulates higher-order chromatin configuration. In the adult brain Satb2 is almost exclusively expressed in pyramidal neurons of two brain regions important for memory formation, the cerebral cortex and the CA1-hippocampal field. Here we show that Satb2 is required for key hippocampal functions since deletion of Satb2 from the adult mouse forebrain prevents the stabilization of synaptic long-term potentiation and markedly impairs long-term fear and object discrimination memory. At molecular level, we find that synaptic activity and BDNF up-regulate Satb2, which itself binds to promoters of coding and non-coding genes. Satb2 controls the hippocampal levels of a large cohort of miRNAs, many of which are implicated in synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Together, our findings demonstrate that Satb2 is critically involved in long-term plasticity processes in the adult forebrain that underlie the consolidation and stabilization of context-linked memory.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Clemens Jaitner

    Institute for Neuroscience, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chethan Reddy

    Institute for Neuroscience, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Andreas Abentung

    Institute for Neuroscience, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nigel Whittle

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Dietmar Rieder

    Division of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andrea Delekate

    Zoological Institute, Technical University Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8887-0806
  7. Martin Korte

    Zoological Institute, Technical University Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gaurav Jain

    Research group for Epigenetics in Neurodegenerative Diseases, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Andre Fischer

    Research group for Epigenetics in Neurodegenerative Diseases, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Farahnaz Sananbenesi

    Research group for Complex Neurodegenerative Disorders, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Isabella Cera

    Institute for Neuroscience, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Nicolas Singewald

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Georg Dechant

    Institute for Neuroscience, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    For correspondence
    georg.dechant@i-med.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Galina Apostolova

    Institute for Neuroscience, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    For correspondence
    galina.apostolova@i-med.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2682-4385

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (P25014-B24)

  • Galina Apostolova

Austrian Science Fund (DK W1206)

  • Georg Dechant

Austrian Science Fund (DK W1206)

  • Nicolas Singewald

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

  • Martin Korte

Innsbruck Medical University (MUI-Start 2010012004)

  • Galina Apostolova

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Anne West, Duke University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experimentation procedures were approved by the Austrian Animal Experimentation Ethics Board (Permit Number: GZ: BMWFW-66.011/0078-WF/II/3b/2014)

Version history

  1. Received: April 28, 2016
  2. Accepted: November 28, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 29, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 3, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Jaitner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,336
    views
  • 816
    downloads
  • 63
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Clemens Jaitner
  2. Chethan Reddy
  3. Andreas Abentung
  4. Nigel Whittle
  5. Dietmar Rieder
  6. Andrea Delekate
  7. Martin Korte
  8. Gaurav Jain
  9. Andre Fischer
  10. Farahnaz Sananbenesi
  11. Isabella Cera
  12. Nicolas Singewald
  13. Georg Dechant
  14. Galina Apostolova
(2016)
Satb2 determines miRNA expression and long-term memory in the adult central nervous system
eLife 5:e17361.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17361

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17361

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Rupam Choudhury, Anuroop Venkateswaran Venkatasubramani ... Axel Imhof
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic chromatin is organized into functional domains, that are characterized by distinct proteomic compositions and specific nuclear positions. In contrast to cellular organelles surrounded by lipid membranes, the composition of distinct chromatin domains is rather ill described and highly dynamic. To gain molecular insight into these domains and explore their composition, we developed an antibody-based proximity-biotinylation method targeting the RNA and proteins constituents. The method that we termed Antibody-Mediated-Proximity-Labelling-coupled to Mass Spectrometry (AMPL-MS) does not require the expression of fusion proteins and therefore constitutes a versatile and very sensitive method to characterize the composition of chromatin domains based on specific signature proteins or histone modifications. To demonstrate the utility of our approach we used AMPL-MS to characterize the molecular features of the chromocenter as well as the chromosome territory containing the hyperactive X-chromosome in Drosophila. This analysis identified a number of known RNA binding proteins in proximity of the hyperactive X and the centromere, supporting the accuracy of our method. In addition, it enabled us to characterize the role of RNA in the formation of these nuclear bodies. Furthermore, our method identified a new set of RNA molecules associated with the Drosophila centromere. Characterization of these novel molecules suggested the formation of R-loops in centromeres, which we validated using a novel probe for R-loops in Drosophila. Taken together, AMPL-MS improves the selectivity and specificity of proximity ligation allowing for novel discoveries of weak protein-RNA interactions in biologically diverse domains.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Gregory Caleb Howard, Jing Wang ... William P Tansey
    Research Article

    The chromatin-associated protein WD Repeat Domain 5 (WDR5) is a promising target for cancer drug discovery, with most efforts blocking an arginine-binding cavity on the protein called the ‘WIN’ site that tethers WDR5 to chromatin. WIN site inhibitors (WINi) are active against multiple cancer cell types in vitro, the most notable of which are those derived from MLL-rearranged (MLLr) leukemias. Peptidomimetic WINi were originally proposed to inhibit MLLr cells via dysregulation of genes connected to hematopoietic stem cell expansion. Our discovery and interrogation of small-molecule WINi, however, revealed that they act in MLLr cell lines to suppress ribosome protein gene (RPG) transcription, induce nucleolar stress, and activate p53. Because there is no precedent for an anticancer strategy that specifically targets RPG expression, we took an integrated multi-omics approach to further interrogate the mechanism of action of WINi in human MLLr cancer cells. We show that WINi induce depletion of the stock of ribosomes, accompanied by a broad yet modest translational choke and changes in alternative mRNA splicing that inactivate the p53 antagonist MDM4. We also show that WINi are synergistic with agents including venetoclax and BET-bromodomain inhibitors. Together, these studies reinforce the concept that WINi are a novel type of ribosome-directed anticancer therapy and provide a resource to support their clinical implementation in MLLr leukemias and other malignancies.