Tim29 is a novel subunit of the human TIM22 translocase and is involved in complex assembly and stability

  1. Yilin Kang
  2. Michael James Baker
  3. Michael Liem
  4. Jade Louber
  5. Matthew McKenzie
  6. Ishara Atukorala
  7. Ching-Seng Ang
  8. Shivakumar Keerthikumar
  9. Suresh Mathivanan
  10. Diana Stojanovski  Is a corresponding author
  1. The University of Melbourne, Australia
  2. La Trobe University, Australia
  3. Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Australia

Abstract

The TIM22 complex mediates the import of hydrophobic carrier proteins into the mitochondrial inner membrane. While the TIM22 machinery has been well characterised in yeast, the human complex remains poorly characterised. Here, we identify Tim29 (C19orf52) as a novel, metazoan-specific subunit of the human TIM22 complex. The protein is integrated into the mitochondrial inner membrane with it's C-terminus exposed to the intermembrane space. Tim29 is required for the stability of the TIM22 complex and functions in the assembly of the hTim22. Furthermore, Tim29 contacts the Translocase of the Outer Mitochondrial Membrane, TOM complex, enabling a mechanism for transport of hydrophobic carrier substrates across the aqueous intermembrane space. Identification of Tim29 highlights the significance of analysing mitochondrial import systems across phylogenetic boundaries, which can reveal novel components and mechanisms in higher organisms.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yilin Kang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Michael James Baker

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Michael Liem

    Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jade Louber

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Matthew McKenzie

    Centre for Genetic Diseases, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ishara Atukorala

    Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ching-Seng Ang

    The Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shivakumar Keerthikumar

    Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Suresh Mathivanan

    Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Diana Stojanovski

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    d.stojanovski@unimelb.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0199-3222

Funding

The authors declare that there was no funding for this work

Reviewing Editor

  1. Nikolaus Pfanner, University of Freiburg, Germany

Version history

  1. Received: May 4, 2016
  2. Accepted: August 14, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 24, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 8, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: December 1, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2016, Kang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,626
    views
  • 568
    downloads
  • 66
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yilin Kang
  2. Michael James Baker
  3. Michael Liem
  4. Jade Louber
  5. Matthew McKenzie
  6. Ishara Atukorala
  7. Ching-Seng Ang
  8. Shivakumar Keerthikumar
  9. Suresh Mathivanan
  10. Diana Stojanovski
(2016)
Tim29 is a novel subunit of the human TIM22 translocase and is involved in complex assembly and stability
eLife 5:e17463.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17463

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17463

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.