Selecting the most appropriate time points to profile in high-throughput studies

  1. Michael Kleyman
  2. Emre Sefer
  3. Teodora Nicola
  4. Celia Espinoza
  5. Divya Chhabra
  6. James S Hagood
  7. Naftali Kaminski
  8. Namasivayam Ambalavanan
  9. Ziv Bar-Joseph  Is a corresponding author
  1. Carnegie Mellon University, United States
  2. University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States
  3. University of California, San Diego, United States
  4. Yale University, United States

Abstract

Biological systems are increasingly being studied by high throughput profiling of molecular data over time. Determining the set of time points to sample in studies that profile several different types of molecular data is still challenging. Here we present the Time Point Selection (TPS) method that solves this combinatorial problem in a principled and practical way. TPS utilizes expression data from a small set of genes sampled at a high rate. As we show by applying TPS to study mouse lung development, the points selected by TPS can be used to reconstruct an accurate representation for the expression values of the non selected points. Further, even though the selection is only based on gene expression, these points are also appropriate for representing a much larger set of protein, miRNA and DNA methylation changes over time. TPS can thus serve as a key design strategy for high throughput time series experiments.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michael Kleyman

    Machine Learning and Computational Biology, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Emre Sefer

    Machine Learning and Computational Biology, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Teodora Nicola

    Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Celia Espinoza

    Department of Pediatrics, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Divya Chhabra

    Department of Pediatrics, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. James S Hagood

    Department of Pediatrics, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Naftali Kaminski

    Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Namasivayam Ambalavanan

    Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birgmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Ziv Bar-Joseph

    Machine Learning and Computational Biology, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States
    For correspondence
    zivbj@cs.cmu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3430-6051

Funding

National Institutes of Health (U01 HL122626)

  • Ziv Bar-Joseph

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Anshul Kundaje

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (APN 10042) of the University of Alabama at Birmingham. All lungs were isolated immediately following euthanasia using approved protocols.

Version history

  1. Received: June 6, 2016
  2. Accepted: January 23, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 26, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 21, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Kleyman et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,501
    views
  • 494
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michael Kleyman
  2. Emre Sefer
  3. Teodora Nicola
  4. Celia Espinoza
  5. Divya Chhabra
  6. James S Hagood
  7. Naftali Kaminski
  8. Namasivayam Ambalavanan
  9. Ziv Bar-Joseph
(2017)
Selecting the most appropriate time points to profile in high-throughput studies
eLife 6:e18541.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18541

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18541

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Ryan T Bell, Harutyun Sahakyan ... Eugene V Koonin
    Research Article

    A comprehensive census of McrBC systems, among the most common forms of prokaryotic Type IV restriction systems, followed by phylogenetic analysis, reveals their enormous abundance in diverse prokaryotes and a plethora of genomic associations. We focus on a previously uncharacterized branch, which we denote coiled-coil nuclease tandems (CoCoNuTs) for their salient features: the presence of extensive coiled-coil structures and tandem nucleases. The CoCoNuTs alone show extraordinary variety, with three distinct types and multiple subtypes. All CoCoNuTs contain domains predicted to interact with translation system components, such as OB-folds resembling the SmpB protein that binds bacterial transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), YTH-like domains that might recognize methylated tmRNA, tRNA, or rRNA, and RNA-binding Hsp70 chaperone homologs, along with RNases, such as HEPN domains, all suggesting that the CoCoNuTs target RNA. Many CoCoNuTs might additionally target DNA, via McrC nuclease homologs. Additional restriction systems, such as Type I RM, BREX, and Druantia Type III, are frequently encoded in the same predicted superoperons. In many of these superoperons, CoCoNuTs are likely regulated by cyclic nucleotides, possibly, RNA fragments with cyclic termini, that bind associated CARF (CRISPR-Associated Rossmann Fold) domains. We hypothesize that the CoCoNuTs, together with the ancillary restriction factors, employ an echeloned defense strategy analogous to that of Type III CRISPR-Cas systems, in which an immune response eliminating virus DNA and/or RNA is launched first, but then, if it fails, an abortive infection response leading to PCD/dormancy via host RNA cleavage takes over.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Skander Kazdaghli, Iordanis Kerenidis ... Philip Teare
    Research Article

    Imputing data is a critical issue for machine learning practitioners, including in the life sciences domain, where missing clinical data is a typical situation and the reliability of the imputation is of great importance. Currently, there is no canonical approach for imputation of clinical data and widely used algorithms introduce variance in the downstream classification. Here we propose novel imputation methods based on determinantal point processes (DPP) that enhance popular techniques such as the multivariate imputation by chained equations and MissForest. Their advantages are twofold: improving the quality of the imputed data demonstrated by increased accuracy of the downstream classification and providing deterministic and reliable imputations that remove the variance from the classification results. We experimentally demonstrate the advantages of our methods by performing extensive imputations on synthetic and real clinical data. We also perform quantum hardware experiments by applying the quantum circuits for DPP sampling since such quantum algorithms provide a computational advantage with respect to classical ones. We demonstrate competitive results with up to 10 qubits for small-scale imputation tasks on a state-of-the-art IBM quantum processor. Our classical and quantum methods improve the effectiveness and robustness of clinical data prediction modeling by providing better and more reliable data imputations. These improvements can add significant value in settings demanding high precision, such as in pharmaceutical drug trials where our approach can provide higher confidence in the predictions made.