Abstract

Seizures are often followed by sensory, cognitive or motor impairments during the postictal phase that show striking similarity to transient hypoxic/ischemic attacks. Here we show that seizures result in a severe hypoxic attack confined to the postictal period. We measured brain oxygenation in localized areas from freely-moving rodents and discovered a severe hypoxic event (pO2<10mmHg) after the termination of seizures. This event lasted over an hour, is mediated by hypoperfusion, generalizes to people with epilepsy, and is attenuated by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2 or L-type calcium channels. Using inhibitors of these targets we separated the seizure from the resulting severe hypoxia and show that structure specific postictal memory and behavioral impairments are the consequence of this severe hypoperfusion/hypoxic event. Thus, epilepsy is much more than a disease hallmarked by seizures, since the occurrence of postictal hypoperfusion/hypoxia results in a separate set of neurological consequences that are currently not being treated and are preventable.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jordan S Farrell

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ismael Gaxiola-Valdez

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Marshal D Wolff

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Laurence S David

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Haruna I Dika

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Bryce L Geeraert

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. X Rachel Wang

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shaily Singh

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Simon C Spanswick

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jeff F Dunn

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Michael C Antle

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5178-4683
  12. Paolo Federico

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    For correspondence
    pfederic@ucalgary.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Gordon Campbell Teskey

    Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    For correspondence
    gteskey@ucalgary.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8462-355X

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-130495)

  • Gordon Campbell Teskey

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN/03819-2014)

  • Gordon Campbell Teskey

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-136839)

  • Paolo Federico

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jan-Marino Ramirez, Seattle Children's Research Institute and University of Washington, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Rodents were handled and maintained according to the Canadian Council for Animal Care guidelines. These procedures were approved by the Life and Environmental Sciences Animal Care and Health Sciences Animal Care Committees at the University of Calgary (AC11-0073).

Human subjects: Human experimentation was approved by the University of Calgary's Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (REB13-0571). All patients (or guardians of patients) provided written informed consent.

Version history

  1. Received: July 4, 2016
  2. Accepted: November 21, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 22, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 13, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Farrell et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,145
    views
  • 529
    downloads
  • 93
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jordan S Farrell
  2. Ismael Gaxiola-Valdez
  3. Marshal D Wolff
  4. Laurence S David
  5. Haruna I Dika
  6. Bryce L Geeraert
  7. X Rachel Wang
  8. Shaily Singh
  9. Simon C Spanswick
  10. Jeff F Dunn
  11. Michael C Antle
  12. Paolo Federico
  13. Gordon Campbell Teskey
(2016)
Postictal behavioural impairments are due to a severe prolonged hypoperfusion/hypoxia event that is COX-2 dependent
eLife 5:e19352.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19352

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19352

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.

    1. Neuroscience
    Kenta Abe, Yuki Kambe ... Tatsuo Sato
    Research Article

    Midbrain dopamine neurons impact neural processing in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) through mesocortical projections. However, the signals conveyed by dopamine projections to the PFC remain unclear, particularly at the single-axon level. Here, we investigated dopaminergic axonal activity in the medial PFC (mPFC) during reward and aversive processing. By optimizing microprism-mediated two-photon calcium imaging of dopamine axon terminals, we found diverse activity in dopamine axons responsive to both reward and aversive stimuli. Some axons exhibited a preference for reward, while others favored aversive stimuli, and there was a strong bias for the latter at the population level. Long-term longitudinal imaging revealed that the preference was maintained in reward- and aversive-preferring axons throughout classical conditioning in which rewarding and aversive stimuli were paired with preceding auditory cues. However, as mice learned to discriminate reward or aversive cues, a cue activity preference gradually developed only in aversive-preferring axons. We inferred the trial-by-trial cue discrimination based on machine learning using anticipatory licking or facial expressions, and found that successful discrimination was accompanied by sharper selectivity for the aversive cue in aversive-preferring axons. Our findings indicate that a group of mesocortical dopamine axons encodes aversive-related signals, which are modulated by both classical conditioning across days and trial-by-trial discrimination within a day.