Design principles of autocatalytic cycles constrain enzyme kinetics and force low substrate saturation at flux branch points

  1. Uri Barenholz  Is a corresponding author
  2. Dan Davidi
  3. Eduard Reznik
  4. Yinon Bar-On
  5. Niv Antonovsky
  6. Elad Noor
  7. Ron Milo  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
  2. The Weizmann Institute for Science, Israel
  3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  4. ETH Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

A set of chemical reactions that require a metabolite to synthesize more of that metabolite is an autocatalytic cycle. Here we show that most of the reactions in the core of central carbon metabolism are part of compact autocatalytic cycles. Such metabolic designs must meet specific conditions to support stable fluxes, hence avoiding depletion of intermediate metabolites. As such, they are subjected to constraints that may seem counter-intuitive: the enzymes of branch reactions out of the cycle must be overexpressed and the affinity of these enzymes to their substrates must be relatively weak. We use recent quantitative proteomics and fluxomics measurements to show that the above conditions hold for functioning cycles in central carbon metabolism of E.coli. This work demonstrates that the topology of a metabolic network can shape kinetic parameters of enzymes and lead to seemingly wasteful enzyme usage.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Uri Barenholz

    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    For correspondence
    uri.barenholz@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3097-9681
  2. Dan Davidi

    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, The Weizmann Institute for Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Eduard Reznik

    Computational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6511-5947
  4. Yinon Bar-On

    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, The Weizmann Institute for Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Niv Antonovsky

    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, The Weizmann Institute for Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Elad Noor

    Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ron Milo

    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, The Weizmann Institute for Science, Rehovot, Israel
    For correspondence
    ron.milo@weizmann.ac.il
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1641-2299

Funding

Israel Science Foundation (740/16)

  • Uri Barenholz
  • Dan Davidi
  • Yinon Bar-On
  • Niv Antonovsky
  • Ron Milo

European Research Council (NOVCARBFIX 646827)

  • Uri Barenholz
  • Dan Davidi
  • Yinon Bar-On
  • Niv Antonovsky
  • Ron Milo

Beck-Canadian Center for Alternative Energy Research

  • Uri Barenholz
  • Dan Davidi
  • Yinon Bar-On
  • Niv Antonovsky
  • Ron Milo

Dana and Yossie Hollander

  • Uri Barenholz
  • Dan Davidi
  • Yinon Bar-On
  • Niv Antonovsky
  • Ron Milo

Helmsley Charitable Foundation

  • Uri Barenholz
  • Dan Davidi
  • Yinon Bar-On
  • Niv Antonovsky
  • Ron Milo

The Larson Charitable Foundation

  • Uri Barenholz
  • Dan Davidi
  • Yinon Bar-On
  • Niv Antonovsky
  • Ron Milo

Wolfson Family Charitable Trust

  • Uri Barenholz
  • Dan Davidi
  • Yinon Bar-On
  • Niv Antonovsky
  • Ron Milo

Charles Rothchild

  • Uri Barenholz
  • Dan Davidi
  • Yinon Bar-On
  • Niv Antonovsky
  • Ron Milo

Selmo Nussenbaum

  • Uri Barenholz
  • Dan Davidi
  • Yinon Bar-On
  • Niv Antonovsky
  • Ron Milo

Alternative sustainable Energy Research Initiative (Graduate Student Fellowship)

  • Uri Barenholz

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Daniel Segre

Version history

  1. Received: August 15, 2016
  2. Accepted: February 1, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 7, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 2, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Barenholz et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,569
    views
  • 652
    downloads
  • 68
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Uri Barenholz
  2. Dan Davidi
  3. Eduard Reznik
  4. Yinon Bar-On
  5. Niv Antonovsky
  6. Elad Noor
  7. Ron Milo
(2017)
Design principles of autocatalytic cycles constrain enzyme kinetics and force low substrate saturation at flux branch points
eLife 6:e20667.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20667

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20667

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    David Geller-McGrath, Kishori M Konwar ... Jason E McDermott
    Tools and Resources

    The reconstruction of complete microbial metabolic pathways using ‘omics data from environmental samples remains challenging. Computational pipelines for pathway reconstruction that utilize machine learning methods to predict the presence or absence of KEGG modules in incomplete genomes are lacking. Here, we present MetaPathPredict, a software tool that incorporates machine learning models to predict the presence of complete KEGG modules within bacterial genomic datasets. Using gene annotation data and information from the KEGG module database, MetaPathPredict employs deep learning models to predict the presence of KEGG modules in a genome. MetaPathPredict can be used as a command line tool or as a Python module, and both options are designed to be run locally or on a compute cluster. Benchmarks show that MetaPathPredict makes robust predictions of KEGG module presence within highly incomplete genomes.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Kenya Hitomi, Yoichiro Ishii, Bei-Wen Ying
    Research Article

    As the genome encodes the information crucial for cell growth, a sizeable genomic deficiency often causes a significant decrease in growth fitness. Whether and how the decreased growth fitness caused by genome reduction could be compensated by evolution was investigated here. Experimental evolution with an Escherichia coli strain carrying a reduced genome was conducted in multiple lineages for approximately 1000 generations. The growth rate, which largely declined due to genome reduction, was considerably recovered, associated with the improved carrying capacity. Genome mutations accumulated during evolution were significantly varied across the evolutionary lineages and were randomly localized on the reduced genome. Transcriptome reorganization showed a common evolutionary direction and conserved the chromosomal periodicity, regardless of highly diversified gene categories, regulons, and pathways enriched in the differentially expressed genes. Genome mutations and transcriptome reorganization caused by evolution, which were found to be dissimilar to those caused by genome reduction, must have followed divergent mechanisms in individual evolutionary lineages. Gene network reconstruction successfully identified three gene modules functionally differentiated, which were responsible for the evolutionary changes of the reduced genome in growth fitness, genome mutation, and gene expression, respectively. The diversity in evolutionary approaches improved the growth fitness associated with the homeostatic transcriptome architecture as if the evolutionary compensation for genome reduction was like all roads leading to Rome.