Assembling the Tat protein translocase

  1. Felicity Alcock
  2. Phillip J Stansfeld  Is a corresponding author
  3. Hajra Basit
  4. Johann Habersetzer
  5. Matthew AB Baker
  6. Tracy Palmer
  7. Mark I Wallace
  8. Ben C Berks  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. Kings College London, United Kingdom
  3. University of Dundee, United Kingdom
  4. University of New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

The twin-arginine protein translocation system (Tat) transports folded proteins across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane and the thylakoid membranes of plant chloroplasts. The Tat transporter is assembled from multiple copies of the membrane proteins TatA, TatB, and TatC. We combine sequence co-evolution analysis, molecular simulations, and experimentation to define the interactions between the Tat proteins of Escherichia coli at molecular-level resolution. In the TatBC receptor complex the transmembrane helix of each TatB molecule is sandwiched between two TatC molecules, with one of the inter-subunit interfaces incorporating a functionally important cluster of interacting polar residues. Unexpectedly, we find that TatA also associates with TatC at the polar cluster site. Our data provide a structural model for assembly of the active Tat translocase in which substrate binding triggers replacement of TatB by TatA at the polar cluster site. Our work demonstrates the power of co-evolution analysis to predict protein interfaces in multi-subunit complexes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Felicity Alcock

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Phillip J Stansfeld

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    phillip.stansfeld@bioch.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hajra Basit

    Department of Chemistry, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Johann Habersetzer

    Division of Molecular Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Matthew AB Baker

    EMBL Australia Node for Single Molecule Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tracy Palmer

    Division of Molecular Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Mark I Wallace

    Department of Chemistry, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5692-8313
  8. Ben C Berks

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    ben.berks@bioch.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9685-4067

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/L002531/1)

  • Tracy Palmer
  • Ben C Berks

Wellcome (Investigator Award 107929/Z/15/Z)

  • Ben C Berks

Medical Research Council (G1001640)

  • Tracy Palmer
  • Ben C Berks

European Commission (Marie Curie Fellowship Programme: GP7-PEOPLE-2013-IEF 626436)

  • Hajra Basit
  • Mark I Wallace

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I019855/1)

  • Phillip J Stansfeld

Wellcome (Investigator Award 110183/Z/15/Z)

  • Tracy Palmer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Nir Ben-Tal, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Version history

  1. Received: August 22, 2016
  2. Accepted: November 29, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 3, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: December 16, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: December 20, 2016 (version 3)
  6. Version of Record published: December 30, 2016 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2016, Alcock et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,139
    views
  • 795
    downloads
  • 60
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Felicity Alcock
  2. Phillip J Stansfeld
  3. Hajra Basit
  4. Johann Habersetzer
  5. Matthew AB Baker
  6. Tracy Palmer
  7. Mark I Wallace
  8. Ben C Berks
(2016)
Assembling the Tat protein translocase
eLife 5:e20718.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20718

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20718

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.