Structure of the active form of human Origin Recognition Complex and its ATPase motor module

  1. Ante Tocilj
  2. Kin Fan On
  3. Zuanning Yuan
  4. Jingchuan Sun
  5. Elad Elkayam
  6. Huilin Li
  7. Bruce Stillman  Is a corresponding author
  8. Leemor Joshua-Tor  Is a corresponding author
  1. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, United States
  2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory/HHMI, United States
  3. Brookhaven National Laboratory/Stony Brook University, United States
  4. Brookhaven National Laboratory, United States
  5. Van Andel Research Institute, United States

Abstract

Binding of the Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) to origins of replication marks the first step in the initiation of replication of the genome in all eukaryotic cells. Here, we report the structure of the active form of human ORC determined by X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy. The complex is composed of an ORC1/4/5 motor module lobe in an organization reminiscent of the DNA polymerase clamp loader complexes. A second lobe contains the ORC2/3 subunits. The complex is organized as a double-layered shallow corkscrew, with the AAA+ and AAA+-like domains forming one layer, and the winged-helix domains (WHDs) forming a top layer. CDC6 fits easily between ORC1 and ORC2, completing the ring and the DNA-binding channel, forming an additional ATP hydrolysis site. Analysis of the ATPase activity of the complex provides a basis for understanding ORC activity as well as molecular defects observed in Meier-Gorlin Syndrome mutations.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ante Tocilj

    Keck Structural Biology Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Kin Fan On

    Keck Structural Biology Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory/HHMI, Cold Spring Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Zuanning Yuan

    Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory/Stony Brook University, Upton/Stony Brook, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jingchuan Sun

    Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Elad Elkayam

    Keck Structural Biology Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory/HHMI, Cold Spring Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Huilin Li

    H. Li Lab, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Bruce Stillman

    Keck Structural Biology Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, United States
    For correspondence
    stillman@cshl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9453-4091
  8. Leemor Joshua-Tor

    Keck Structural Biology Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory/HHMI, Cold Spring Harbor, United States
    For correspondence
    leemor@cshl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8185-8049

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Ante Tocilj

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM45436)

  • Bruce Stillman

National Cancer Institute (PO1-CA13016)

  • Bruce Stillman

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM111742)

  • Huilin Li

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. John Kuriyan, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Version history

  1. Received: August 22, 2016
  2. Accepted: January 15, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 23, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: January 24, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: February 3, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Tocilj et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,088
    views
  • 887
    downloads
  • 42
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ante Tocilj
  2. Kin Fan On
  3. Zuanning Yuan
  4. Jingchuan Sun
  5. Elad Elkayam
  6. Huilin Li
  7. Bruce Stillman
  8. Leemor Joshua-Tor
(2017)
Structure of the active form of human Origin Recognition Complex and its ATPase motor module
eLife 6:e20818.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20818

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20818

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Marco van den Noort, Panagiotis Drougkas ... Bert Poolman
    Research Article

    Bacteria utilize various strategies to prevent internal dehydration during hypertonic stress. A common approach to countering the effects of the stress is to import compatible solutes such as glycine betaine, leading to simultaneous passive water fluxes following the osmotic gradient. OpuA from Lactococcus lactis is a type I ABC-importer that uses two substrate-binding domains (SBDs) to capture extracellular glycine betaine and deliver the substrate to the transmembrane domains for subsequent transport. OpuA senses osmotic stress via changes in the internal ionic strength and is furthermore regulated by the 2nd messenger cyclic-di-AMP. We now show, by means of solution-based single-molecule FRET and analysis with multi-parameter photon-by-photon hidden Markov modeling, that the SBDs transiently interact in an ionic strength-dependent manner. The smFRET data are in accordance with the apparent cooperativity in transport and supported by new cryo-EM data of OpuA. We propose that the physical interactions between SBDs and cooperativity in substrate delivery are part of the transport mechanism.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Xiao-Ru Chen, Karuna Dixit ... Tatyana I Igumenova
    Research Article

    Regulated hydrolysis of the phosphoinositide phosphatidylinositol(4,5)-bis-phosphate to diacylglycerol and inositol-1,4,5-P3 defines a major eukaryotic pathway for translation of extracellular cues to intracellular signaling circuits. Members of the lipid-activated protein kinase C isoenzyme family (PKCs) play central roles in this signaling circuit. One of the regulatory mechanisms employed to downregulate stimulated PKC activity is via a proteasome-dependent degradation pathway that is potentiated by peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1. Here, we show that contrary to prevailing models, Pin1 does not regulate conventional PKC isoforms α and βII via a canonical cis-trans isomerization of the peptidyl-prolyl bond. Rather, Pin1 acts as a PKC binding partner that controls PKC activity via sequestration of the C-terminal tail of the kinase. The high-resolution structure of full-length Pin1 complexed to the C-terminal tail of PKCβII reveals that a novel bivalent interaction mode underlies the non-catalytic mode of Pin1 action. Specifically, Pin1 adopts a conformation in which it uses the WW and PPIase domains to engage two conserved phosphorylated PKC motifs, the turn motif and hydrophobic motif, respectively. Hydrophobic motif is a non-canonical Pin1-interacting element. The structural information combined with the results of extensive binding studies and experiments in cultured cells suggest that non-catalytic mechanisms represent unappreciated modes of Pin1-mediated regulation of AGC kinases and other key enzymes/substrates.