TCF7L1 promotes skin tumorigenesis independently of β-catenin through induction of LCN2

  1. Amy T Ku
  2. Timothy M Shaver
  3. Ajay S Rao
  4. Jeffrey M Howard
  5. Christine N Rodriguez
  6. Qi Miao
  7. Gloria Garcia
  8. Diep Le
  9. Diane Yang
  10. Malgorzata Borowiak
  11. Daniel N Cohen
  12. Vida Chitsazzadeh
  13. Abdul H Diwan
  14. Kenneth Y Tsai
  15. Hoang Nguyen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  2. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
  3. Moffitt Cancer Center, United States

Abstract

The transcription factor TCF7L1 is an embryonic stem cell signature gene that is upregulated in multiple aggressive cancer types, but its role in skin tumorigenesis has not yet been defined. Here we document TCF7L1 upregulation in skin squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and demonstrate that TCF7L1 overexpression increases tumor incidence, tumor multiplicity, and malignant progression in the chemically induced mouse model of skin SCC. Additionally, we show that downregulation of TCF7L1 and its paralogue TCF7L2 reduces tumor growth in a xenograft model of human skin SCC. Using separation-of-function mutants, we show that TCF7L1 promotes tumor growth, enhances cell migration, and overrides oncogenic RAS-induced senescence independently of its interaction with β-catenin. Through transcriptome profiling and combined gain- and loss-of-function studies, we identified LCN2 as a major downstream effector of TCF7L1 that drives tumor growth. Our findings establish a tumor-promoting role for TCF7L1 in skin and elucidate the mechanisms underlying its tumorigenic capacity.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Amy T Ku

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Timothy M Shaver

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ajay S Rao

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jeffrey M Howard

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Christine N Rodriguez

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Qi Miao

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Gloria Garcia

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Diep Le

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Diane Yang

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Malgorzata Borowiak

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Daniel N Cohen

    Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Vida Chitsazzadeh

    Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Abdul H Diwan

    Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Kenneth Y Tsai

    Anatomic Pathology and Tumor Biology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Hoang Nguyen

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    hoangn@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1091-7483

Funding

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP110153)

  • Hoang Nguyen

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP101499)

  • Jeffrey M Howard

National Institutes of Health (T32-HL092332-07)

  • Jeffrey M Howard

National Institutes of Health (T32HL92332)

  • Amy T Ku

National Institutes of Health (T32GM088129)

  • Amy T Ku

National Institutes of Health (7R01CA194617)

  • Kenneth Y Tsai

National Institutes of Health (R01 CA194062)

  • Kenneth Y Tsai

T . Boone Pickens Endowment

  • Kenneth Y Tsai

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Valerie Horsley, Yale University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mice were maintained in the AALAC-accredited animal facilities at Baylor College of Medicine and MD Anderson and all mouse experiments were conducted according to protocols approved by committees at Baylor College of Medicine (AN-4907) and MD Anderson (ACUF00001396-RN00).

Version history

  1. Received: November 12, 2016
  2. Accepted: April 29, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 3, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 19, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Ku et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,678
    views
  • 364
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Amy T Ku
  2. Timothy M Shaver
  3. Ajay S Rao
  4. Jeffrey M Howard
  5. Christine N Rodriguez
  6. Qi Miao
  7. Gloria Garcia
  8. Diep Le
  9. Diane Yang
  10. Malgorzata Borowiak
  11. Daniel N Cohen
  12. Vida Chitsazzadeh
  13. Abdul H Diwan
  14. Kenneth Y Tsai
  15. Hoang Nguyen
(2017)
TCF7L1 promotes skin tumorigenesis independently of β-catenin through induction of LCN2
eLife 6:e23242.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23242

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23242

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Célia Guérin, David Tulasne
    Review Article

    Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) directed against MET have been recently approved to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring activating MET mutations. This success is the consequence of a long characterization of MET mutations in cancers, which we propose to outline in this review. MET, a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), displays in a broad panel of cancers many deregulations liable to promote tumour progression. The first MET mutation was discovered in 1997, in hereditary papillary renal cancer (HPRC), providing the first direct link between MET mutations and cancer development. As in other RTKs, these mutations are located in the kinase domain, leading in most cases to ligand-independent MET activation. In 2014, novel MET mutations were identified in several advanced cancers, including lung cancers. These mutations alter splice sites of exon 14, causing in-frame exon 14 skipping and deletion of a regulatory domain. Because these mutations are not located in the kinase domain, they are original and their mode of action has yet to be fully elucidated. Less than five years after the discovery of such mutations, the efficacy of a MET TKI was evidenced in NSCLC patients displaying MET exon 14 skipping. Yet its use led to a resistance mechanism involving acquisition of novel and already characterized MET mutations. Furthermore, novel somatic MET mutations are constantly being discovered. The challenge is no longer to identify them but to characterize them in order to predict their transforming activity and their sensitivity or resistance to MET TKIs, in order to adapt treatment.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kevin Nuno, Armon Azizi ... Ravindra Majeti
    Research Article

    Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is highly aggressive and often treatment refractory. We analyzed previously published AML relapse cohorts and found that 40% of relapses occur without changes in driver mutations, suggesting that non-genetic mechanisms drive relapse in a large proportion of cases. We therefore characterized epigenetic patterns of AML relapse using 26 matched diagnosis-relapse samples with ATAC-seq. This analysis identified a relapse-specific chromatin accessibility signature for mutationally stable AML, suggesting that AML undergoes epigenetic evolution at relapse independent of mutational changes. Analysis of leukemia stem cell (LSC) chromatin changes at relapse indicated that this leukemic compartment underwent significantly less epigenetic evolution than non-LSCs, while epigenetic changes in non-LSCs reflected overall evolution of the bulk leukemia. Finally, we used single-cell ATAC-seq paired with mitochondrial sequencing (mtscATAC) to map clones from diagnosis into relapse along with their epigenetic features. We found that distinct mitochondrially-defined clones exhibit more similar chromatin accessibility at relapse relative to diagnosis, demonstrating convergent epigenetic evolution in relapsed AML. These results demonstrate that epigenetic evolution is a feature of relapsed AML and that convergent epigenetic evolution can occur following treatment with induction chemotherapy.