Evolution of an intricate J-protein network driving protein disaggregation in eukaryotes

  1. Nadinath B Nillegoda  Is a corresponding author
  2. Antonia Stank
  3. Duccio Malinverni
  4. Niels Alberts
  5. Anna Szlachcic
  6. Alessandro Barducci
  7. Paolo De Los Rios
  8. Rebecca C Wade  Is a corresponding author
  9. Bernd Bukau  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Heidelberg, Germany
  2. Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Germany
  3. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
  4. Inserm, U1054, France

Abstract

Hsp70 participates in a broad spectrum of protein folding processes extending from nascent chain folding to protein disaggregation. This versatility in function is achieved through a diverse family of J-protein cochaperones that select substrates for Hsp70. Substrate selection is further tuned by transient complexation between different classes of J-proteins, which expands the range of protein aggregates targeted by metazoan Hsp70 for disaggregation. We assessed the prevalence and evolutionary conservation of J-protein complexation and cooperation in disaggregation. We find the emergence of a eukaryote-specific signature for interclass complexation of canonical J-proteins. Consistently, complexes exist in yeast and human cells, but not in bacteria, and correlate with cooperative action in disaggregation in vitro. Signature alterations exclude some J-proteins from networking, which ensures correct J-protein pairing, functional network integrity and J-protein specialization. This fundamental change in J-protein biology during the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition allows for increased fine-tuning and broadening of Hsp70 function in eukaryotes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nadinath B Nillegoda

    Center for Molecular Biology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    For correspondence
    n.nillegoda@zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Antonia Stank

    Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Duccio Malinverni

    Laboratory of Statistical Biophysics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Niels Alberts

    Center for Molecular Biology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anna Szlachcic

    Center for Molecular Biology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Alessandro Barducci

    Inserm, U1054, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1911-8039
  7. Paolo De Los Rios

    Laboratory of Statistical Biophysics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Rebecca C Wade

    Center for Molecular Biology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    For correspondence
    rebecca.wade@h-its.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5951-8670
  9. Bernd Bukau

    Center for Molecular Biology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    For correspondence
    bukau@zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0521-7199

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1036 BU617/19-3)

  • Bernd Bukau

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (NA)

  • Nadinath B Nillegoda

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jeffery W Kelly, The Scripps Research Institute, United States

Version history

  1. Received: December 22, 2016
  2. Accepted: May 12, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 15, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: May 23, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: August 3, 2017 (version 3)
  6. Version of Record updated: August 8, 2017 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2017, Nillegoda et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,609
    views
  • 890
    downloads
  • 60
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nadinath B Nillegoda
  2. Antonia Stank
  3. Duccio Malinverni
  4. Niels Alberts
  5. Anna Szlachcic
  6. Alessandro Barducci
  7. Paolo De Los Rios
  8. Rebecca C Wade
  9. Bernd Bukau
(2017)
Evolution of an intricate J-protein network driving protein disaggregation in eukaryotes
eLife 6:e24560.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24560

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24560

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.