A cellular mechanism for inverse effectiveness in multisensory integration

  1. Torrey LS Truszkowski
  2. Oscar A Carrillo
  3. Julia Bleier
  4. Carolina Ramirez-Vizcarrondo
  5. Molly McQuillan
  6. Christopher P Truszkowski
  7. Arseny S Khakhalin
  8. Carlos D Aizenman  Is a corresponding author
  1. Brown University, United States
  2. Bard College, United States
  3. Roger Williams University, United States

Abstract

To build a coherent view of the external world, an organism needs to integrate multiple types of sensory information from different sources, a process known as multisensory integration (MSI). In a prior study (Felch et al. 2016) we showed that the temporal dependence of MSI in the optic tectum of Xenopus laevis tadpoles is mediated by the network dynamics of the recruitment of local inhibition by sensory input. This was one of the first cellular-level mechanisms described for MSI. Here we expand this cellular level view of MSI by focusing on the principle of inverse effectiveness, another central feature of MSI stating that the amount of multisensory enhancement observed inversely depends on the size of unisensory responses. We show that non-linear summation of crossmodal synaptic responses, mediated by NMDA-type glutamate receptor (NMDARs) activation, form the cellular basis for inverse effectiveness, both at the cellular and behavioral levels.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Torrey LS Truszkowski

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Oscar A Carrillo

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Julia Bleier

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Carolina Ramirez-Vizcarrondo

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Molly McQuillan

    Bard College, Annandale-On-Hudson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Christopher P Truszkowski

    Digital Services, Roger Williams University, Bristol, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Arseny S Khakhalin

    Bard College, Annandale-On-Hudson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0429-1728
  8. Carlos D Aizenman

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    For correspondence
    Carlos_Aizenman@brown.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7378-7217

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NIH F31 NS09379001)

  • Torrey LS Truszkowski

National Science Foundation (NSF IOS 1353044)

  • Torrey LS Truszkowski
  • Oscar A Carrillo
  • Julia Bleier
  • Carolina Ramirez-Vizcarrondo
  • Christopher P Truszkowski
  • Carlos D Aizenman

American Physiological Society

  • Oscar A Carrillo
  • Carolina Ramirez-Vizcarrondo

Bard Summer Research Institute, Bard College

  • Molly McQuillan
  • Arseny S Khakhalin

Brown University

  • Oscar A Carrillo
  • Julia Bleier
  • Carolina Ramirez-Vizcarrondo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Gary L Westbrook, Vollum Institute, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (1607000219) of Brown University.

Version history

  1. Received: January 25, 2017
  2. Accepted: March 15, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 18, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 24, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: March 31, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Truszkowski et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,204
    views
  • 423
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Torrey LS Truszkowski
  2. Oscar A Carrillo
  3. Julia Bleier
  4. Carolina Ramirez-Vizcarrondo
  5. Molly McQuillan
  6. Christopher P Truszkowski
  7. Arseny S Khakhalin
  8. Carlos D Aizenman
(2017)
A cellular mechanism for inverse effectiveness in multisensory integration
eLife 6:e25392.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25392

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25392

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Hao Li, Jingyu Feng ... Jufang He
    Research Article

    Cholecystokinin (CCK) is an essential modulator for neuroplasticity in sensory and emotional domains. Here, we investigated the role of CCK in motor learning using a single pellet reaching task in mice. Mice with a knockout of Cck gene (Cck−/−) or blockade of CCK-B receptor (CCKBR) showed defective motor learning ability; the success rate of retrieving reward remained at the baseline level compared to the wildtype mice with significantly increased success rate. We observed no long-term potentiation upon high-frequency stimulation in the motor cortex of Cck−/− mice, indicating a possible association between motor learning deficiency and neuroplasticity in the motor cortex. In vivo calcium imaging demonstrated that the deficiency of CCK signaling disrupted the refinement of population neuronal activity in the motor cortex during motor skill training. Anatomical tracing revealed direct projections from CCK-expressing neurons in the rhinal cortex to the motor cortex. Inactivation of the CCK neurons in the rhinal cortex that project to the motor cortex bilaterally using chemogenetic methods significantly suppressed motor learning, and intraperitoneal application of CCK4, a tetrapeptide CCK agonist, rescued the motor learning deficits of Cck−/− mice. In summary, our results suggest that CCK, which could be provided from the rhinal cortex, may surpport motor skill learning by modulating neuroplasticity in the motor cortex.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ivan Tomić, Paul M Bays
    Research Article

    Probing memory of a complex visual image within a few hundred milliseconds after its disappearance reveals significantly greater fidelity of recall than if the probe is delayed by as little as a second. Classically interpreted, the former taps into a detailed but rapidly decaying visual sensory or ‘iconic’ memory (IM), while the latter relies on capacity-limited but comparatively stable visual working memory (VWM). While iconic decay and VWM capacity have been extensively studied independently, currently no single framework quantitatively accounts for the dynamics of memory fidelity over these time scales. Here, we extend a stationary neural population model of VWM with a temporal dimension, incorporating rapid sensory-driven accumulation of activity encoding each visual feature in memory, and a slower accumulation of internal error that causes memorized features to randomly drift over time. Instead of facilitating read-out from an independent sensory store, an early cue benefits recall by lifting the effective limit on VWM signal strength imposed when multiple items compete for representation, allowing memory for the cued item to be supplemented with information from the decaying sensory trace. Empirical measurements of human recall dynamics validate these predictions while excluding alternative model architectures. A key conclusion is that differences in capacity classically thought to distinguish IM and VWM are in fact contingent upon a single resource-limited WM store.