Rapid short-term reorganization in the language network

  1. Gesa Hartwigsen  Is a corresponding author
  2. Danilo Bzdok
  3. Maren Klein
  4. Max Wawrzyniak
  5. Anika Stockert
  6. Katrin Wrede
  7. Joseph Classen
  8. Dorothee Saur
  1. Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany
  2. RWTH Aachen, Germany
  3. University of Leipzig, Germany

Abstract

The adaptive potential of the language network to compensate for lesions remains elusive. We show that perturbation of a semantic region in the healthy brain induced suppression of activity in a large semantic network and upregulation of neighbouring phonological areas. After perturbation, the disrupted area increased its inhibitory influence on another semantic key node. The inhibitory influence predicted the individual delay in response speed, indicating that inhibition at remote nodes is functionally relevant. Individual disruption predicted the upregulation of semantic activity in phonological regions. In contrast, perturbation over a phonological region suppressed activity in the network and disrupted behaviour without inducing upregulation. The beneficial contribution of a neighbouring network might thus depend on the level of functional disruption and may be interpreted to reflect a differential compensatory potential of distinct language networks. These results might reveal generic mechanisms of plasticity in cognitive networks and inform models of language reorganization.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gesa Hartwigsen

    Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
    For correspondence
    hartwigsen@cbs.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8084-1330
  2. Danilo Bzdok

    Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3466-6620
  3. Maren Klein

    Language and Aphasia Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Max Wawrzyniak

    Language and Aphasia Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anika Stockert

    Language and Aphasia Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Katrin Wrede

    Language and Aphasia Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Joseph Classen

    Human Cortical Physiology and Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Dorothee Saur

    Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HA-6314-1-1)

  • Gesa Hartwigsen

James F. MacDonnell Foundation

  • Dorothee Saur

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Heidi Johansen-Berg, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Ethics

Human subjects: Written informed consent was obtained before the experiment.The study was performed according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethics committee (Medical Faculty at the University of Leipzig).

Version history

  1. Received: February 13, 2017
  2. Accepted: May 23, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 24, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 15, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Hartwigsen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,802
    views
  • 403
    downloads
  • 46
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gesa Hartwigsen
  2. Danilo Bzdok
  3. Maren Klein
  4. Max Wawrzyniak
  5. Anika Stockert
  6. Katrin Wrede
  7. Joseph Classen
  8. Dorothee Saur
(2017)
Rapid short-term reorganization in the language network
eLife 6:e25964.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Juan Jose Rodriguez Gotor, Kashif Mahfooz ... John F Wesseling
    Research Article

    Vesicles within presynaptic terminals are thought to be segregated into a variety of readily releasable and reserve pools. The nature of the pools and trafficking between them is not well understood, but pools that are slow to mobilize when synapses are active are often assumed to feed pools that are mobilized more quickly, in a series. However, electrophysiological studies of synaptic transmission have suggested instead a parallel organization where vesicles within slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools would separately feed independent reluctant- and fast-releasing subdivisions of the readily releasable pool. Here, we use FM-dyes to confirm the existence of multiple reserve pools at hippocampal synapses and a parallel organization that prevents intermixing between the pools, even when stimulation is intense enough to drive exocytosis at the maximum rate. The experiments additionally demonstrate extensive heterogeneity among synapses in the relative sizes of the slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools, which suggests equivalent heterogeneity in the numbers of reluctant and fast-releasing readily releasable vesicles that may be relevant for understanding information processing and storage.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Daniel Thiel, Luis Alfonso Yañez Guerra ... Gáspár Jékely
    Research Article

    Neuropeptides are ancient signaling molecules in animals but only few peptide receptors are known outside bilaterians. Cnidarians possess a large number of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) – the most common receptors of bilaterian neuropeptides – but most of these remain orphan with no known ligands. We searched for neuropeptides in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis and created a library of 64 peptides derived from 33 precursors. In a large-scale pharmacological screen with these peptides and 161 N. vectensis GPCRs, we identified 31 receptors specifically activated by 1 to 3 of 14 peptides. Mapping GPCR and neuropeptide expression to single-cell sequencing data revealed how cnidarian tissues are extensively connected by multilayer peptidergic networks. Phylogenetic analysis identified no direct orthology to bilaterian peptidergic systems and supports the independent expansion of neuropeptide signaling in cnidarians from a few ancestral peptide-receptor pairs.