Evolutionary changes in transcription factor coding sequence quantitatively alter sensory organ development and function

  1. Simon Weinberger
  2. Matthew P Topping
  3. Jiekun Yan
  4. Annelies Claeys
  5. Natalie De Geest
  6. Duru Ozbay
  7. Talah Hassan
  8. Xiaoli He
  9. Joerg T Albert
  10. Bassem A Hassan  Is a corresponding author
  11. Ariane Ramaekers  Is a corresponding author
  1. VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, Belgium
  2. University College London, United Kingdom
  3. ICM, France

Abstract

'Toolkit' genes are highly conserved developmental regulators. While changes in their regulatory elements contribute to morphological evolution, the role of coding sequence (CDS) evolution remains unresolved. We used CDS-specific knock-ins of the proneural transcription factor Atonal homologs (ATHs) to address this question. Drosophila Atonal CDS was endogenously replaced with that of distant ATHs at key phylogenetic positions, non-ATH proneural genes, and the closest CDS to ancestral proneural genes. ATHs and the ancestral-like gene rescued sensory organ fate in atonal mutants, in contrast to non-ATHs. Surprisingly, different ATHs displayed a gradient of quantitative variation in proneural activity and the number and functionality of sense organs. This proneural potency gradient correlated directly with ATH protein stability, including in response to Notch signaling, independently of mRNA levels or codon usage. This establishes a distinct and ancient function for ATHs and demonstrates that CDS evolution can underlie quantitative variation in sensory development and function.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Simon Weinberger

    VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Matthew P Topping

    Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jiekun Yan

    VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Annelies Claeys

    VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Natalie De Geest

    VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Duru Ozbay

    VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Talah Hassan

    Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Xiaoli He

    Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Joerg T Albert

    Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Bassem A Hassan

    Brain Development, ICM, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    bassem.hassan@icm-institute.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9533-4908
  11. Ariane Ramaekers

    VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    ariane.ramaekers@icm-institute.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie

  • Simon Weinberger
  • Jiekun Yan
  • Annelies Claeys
  • Natalie De Geest
  • Duru Ozbay
  • Bassem A Hassan
  • Ariane Ramaekers

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

  • Simon Weinberger
  • Jiekun Yan
  • Annelies Claeys
  • Natalie De Geest
  • Duru Ozbay
  • Bassem A Hassan
  • Ariane Ramaekers

BELSPO

  • Simon Weinberger
  • Jiekun Yan
  • Annelies Claeys
  • Natalie De Geest
  • Duru Ozbay
  • Bassem A Hassan
  • Ariane Ramaekers

European Commission

  • Simon Weinberger
  • Bassem A Hassan

Human Frontier Science Program

  • Matthew P Topping
  • Talah Hassan
  • Xiaoli He
  • Joerg T Albert

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

  • Matthew P Topping
  • Talah Hassan
  • Xiaoli He
  • Joerg T Albert

Paul G. Allen Family Foundation

  • Bassem A Hassan

Einstein Stiftung Berlin

  • Bassem A Hassan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Hugo J Bellen, Baylor College of Medicine, United States

Version history

  1. Received: February 27, 2017
  2. Accepted: March 27, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 13, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 15, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Weinberger et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,754
    views
  • 402
    downloads
  • 25
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Simon Weinberger
  2. Matthew P Topping
  3. Jiekun Yan
  4. Annelies Claeys
  5. Natalie De Geest
  6. Duru Ozbay
  7. Talah Hassan
  8. Xiaoli He
  9. Joerg T Albert
  10. Bassem A Hassan
  11. Ariane Ramaekers
(2017)
Evolutionary changes in transcription factor coding sequence quantitatively alter sensory organ development and function
eLife 6:e26402.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26402

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26402

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Amandine Jarysta, Abigail LD Tadenev ... Basile Tarchini
    Research Article

    Inhibitory G alpha (GNAI or Gαi) proteins are critical for the polarized morphogenesis of sensory hair cells and for hearing. The extent and nature of their actual contributions remains unclear, however, as previous studies did not investigate all GNAI proteins and included non-physiological approaches. Pertussis toxin can downregulate functionally redundant GNAI1, GNAI2, GNAI3, and GNAO proteins, but may also induce unrelated defects. Here, we directly and systematically determine the role(s) of each individual GNAI protein in mouse auditory hair cells. GNAI2 and GNAI3 are similarly polarized at the hair cell apex with their binding partner G protein signaling modulator 2 (GPSM2), whereas GNAI1 and GNAO are not detected. In Gnai3 mutants, GNAI2 progressively fails to fully occupy the sub-cellular compartments where GNAI3 is missing. In contrast, GNAI3 can fully compensate for the loss of GNAI2 and is essential for hair bundle morphogenesis and auditory function. Simultaneous inactivation of Gnai2 and Gnai3 recapitulates for the first time two distinct types of defects only observed so far with pertussis toxin: (1) a delay or failure of the basal body to migrate off-center in prospective hair cells, and (2) a reversal in the orientation of some hair cell types. We conclude that GNAI proteins are critical for hair cells to break planar symmetry and to orient properly before GNAI2/3 regulate hair bundle morphogenesis with GPSM2.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Gang Xue, Xiaoyi Zhang ... Zhiyuan Li
    Research Article

    Organisms utilize gene regulatory networks (GRN) to make fate decisions, but the regulatory mechanisms of transcription factors (TF) in GRNs are exceedingly intricate. A longstanding question in this field is how these tangled interactions synergistically contribute to decision-making procedures. To comprehensively understand the role of regulatory logic in cell fate decisions, we constructed a logic-incorporated GRN model and examined its behavior under two distinct driving forces (noise-driven and signal-driven). Under the noise-driven mode, we distilled the relationship among fate bias, regulatory logic, and noise profile. Under the signal-driven mode, we bridged regulatory logic and progression-accuracy trade-off, and uncovered distinctive trajectories of reprogramming influenced by logic motifs. In differentiation, we characterized a special logic-dependent priming stage by the solution landscape. Finally, we applied our findings to decipher three biological instances: hematopoiesis, embryogenesis, and trans-differentiation. Orthogonal to the classical analysis of expression profile, we harnessed noise patterns to construct the GRN corresponding to fate transition. Our work presents a generalizable framework for top-down fate-decision studies and a practical approach to the taxonomy of cell fate decisions.