Structure analyses reveal a regulated oligomerization mechanism of the PlexinD1/GIPC/myosin VI complex

  1. Guijun Shang
  2. Chad A Brautigam
  3. Rui Chen
  4. Defen Lu
  5. Jesús Torres-Vázquez
  6. Xuewu Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
  2. New York University Langone Medical Center, United States

Abstract

The GIPC family adaptor proteins mediate endocytosis by tethering cargo proteins to the myosin VI motor. The structural mechanisms for the GIPC/cargo and GIPC/myosin VI interactions remained unclear. PlexinD1, a transmembrane receptor that regulates neuronal and cardiovascular development, is a cargo of GIPCs. GIPC-mediated endocytic trafficking regulates PlexinD1 signaling. Here we unravel the mechanisms of the interactions among PlexinD1, GIPCs and myosin VI by a series of crystal structures of these proteins in apo or bound states. GIPC1 forms a domain-swapped dimer in an autoinhibited conformation that hinders binding of both PlexinD1 and myosin VI. PlexinD1 binding to GIPC1 releases the autoinhibition, promoting its interaction with myosin VI. GIPCs and myosin VI interact through two distinct interfaces and form an open-ended alternating array. Our data support that this alternating array underlies the oligomerization of the GIPC/Myosin VI complexes in solution and cells.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
    1. Shang G
    2. Zhang X
    (2017) Structure of apo-PlexinD1
    Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5V6R).
    1. Shang G
    2. Zhang X
    (2017) Structure of apo-GIPC1
    Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5V6B).
    1. Shang G
    2. Zhang X
    (2017) Structure of the PlexinD1/GIPC1 complex
    Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5V6T).
    1. Shang G
    2. Zhang X
    (2017) Structure of the GIPC1-GH2/Myosin VI-HCBD complex
    Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5V6E).
    1. Shang G
    2. Zhang X
    (2017) Structure of the GIPC2-GH2/Myosin VI-HCBD complex
    Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5V6H).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Guijun Shang

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chad A Brautigam

    Department of Biophysics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rui Chen

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Defen Lu

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jesús Torres-Vázquez

    Department of Cell Biology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Xuewu Zhang

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    For correspondence
    xuewu.zhang@utsouthwestern.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3634-6711

Funding

National Institutes of Health (GM088197)

  • Guijun Shang
  • Rui Chen
  • Xuewu Zhang

Welch Foundation (I-1702)

  • Guijun Shang
  • Rui Chen
  • Xuewu Zhang

National Institutes of Health (R01HL133687)

  • Jesús Torres-Vázquez

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Suzanne R Pfeffer, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States

Version history

  1. Received: March 29, 2017
  2. Accepted: May 23, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 24, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 6, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Shang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,530
    views
  • 433
    downloads
  • 40
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Guijun Shang
  2. Chad A Brautigam
  3. Rui Chen
  4. Defen Lu
  5. Jesús Torres-Vázquez
  6. Xuewu Zhang
(2017)
Structure analyses reveal a regulated oligomerization mechanism of the PlexinD1/GIPC/myosin VI complex
eLife 6:e27322.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27322

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27322

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Marco van den Noort, Panagiotis Drougkas ... Bert Poolman
    Research Article

    Bacteria utilize various strategies to prevent internal dehydration during hypertonic stress. A common approach to countering the effects of the stress is to import compatible solutes such as glycine betaine, leading to simultaneous passive water fluxes following the osmotic gradient. OpuA from Lactococcus lactis is a type I ABC-importer that uses two substrate-binding domains (SBDs) to capture extracellular glycine betaine and deliver the substrate to the transmembrane domains for subsequent transport. OpuA senses osmotic stress via changes in the internal ionic strength and is furthermore regulated by the 2nd messenger cyclic-di-AMP. We now show, by means of solution-based single-molecule FRET and analysis with multi-parameter photon-by-photon hidden Markov modeling, that the SBDs transiently interact in an ionic strength-dependent manner. The smFRET data are in accordance with the apparent cooperativity in transport and supported by new cryo-EM data of OpuA. We propose that the physical interactions between SBDs and cooperativity in substrate delivery are part of the transport mechanism.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Xiao-Ru Chen, Karuna Dixit ... Tatyana I Igumenova
    Research Article

    Regulated hydrolysis of the phosphoinositide phosphatidylinositol(4,5)-bis-phosphate to diacylglycerol and inositol-1,4,5-P3 defines a major eukaryotic pathway for translation of extracellular cues to intracellular signaling circuits. Members of the lipid-activated protein kinase C isoenzyme family (PKCs) play central roles in this signaling circuit. One of the regulatory mechanisms employed to downregulate stimulated PKC activity is via a proteasome-dependent degradation pathway that is potentiated by peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1. Here, we show that contrary to prevailing models, Pin1 does not regulate conventional PKC isoforms α and βII via a canonical cis-trans isomerization of the peptidyl-prolyl bond. Rather, Pin1 acts as a PKC binding partner that controls PKC activity via sequestration of the C-terminal tail of the kinase. The high-resolution structure of full-length Pin1 complexed to the C-terminal tail of PKCβII reveals that a novel bivalent interaction mode underlies the non-catalytic mode of Pin1 action. Specifically, Pin1 adopts a conformation in which it uses the WW and PPIase domains to engage two conserved phosphorylated PKC motifs, the turn motif and hydrophobic motif, respectively. Hydrophobic motif is a non-canonical Pin1-interacting element. The structural information combined with the results of extensive binding studies and experiments in cultured cells suggest that non-catalytic mechanisms represent unappreciated modes of Pin1-mediated regulation of AGC kinases and other key enzymes/substrates.