Structure and in situ organisation of the Pyrococcus furiosus archaellum machinery

  1. Bertram Daum  Is a corresponding author
  2. Janet Vonck
  3. Annett Bellack
  4. Paushali Chaudhury
  5. Robert Reichelt
  6. Sonja V Albers
  7. Reinhard Rachel
  8. Werner Kühlbrandt
  1. Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Germany
  2. University of Regensburg, Germany
  3. University of Freiburg, Germany

Abstract

The archaellum is the macromolecular machinery that archaea use for propulsion or surface adhesion, enabling them to proliferate and invade new territories. The molecular composition of the archaellum and of the motor that drives it appears to be entirely distinct from that of the functionally equivalent bacterial flagellum and flagellar motor. Yet, the structure of the archaellum machinery is scarcely known. Using combined modes of electron cryo-microscopy (cryoEM), we have solved the structure of the Pyrococcus furiosus archaellum filament at 4.2 Å resolution and visualise the architecture and organisation of its motor complex in situ. This allows us to build a structural model combining the archaellum and its motor complex, paving the way to a molecular understanding of archaeal swimming motion.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Bertram Daum

    Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt, Germany
    For correspondence
    b.daum2@exeter.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3767-264X
  2. Janet Vonck

    Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5659-8863
  3. Annett Bellack

    Institute of Microbiology and Archaea Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Paushali Chaudhury

    Institute of Biology II, Molecular Biology of Archaea, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Robert Reichelt

    Institute of Microbiology and Archaea Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Sonja V Albers

    Institute of Biology II, Molecular Biology of Archaea, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2459-2226
  7. Reinhard Rachel

    Institute of Microbiology and Archaea Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6367-1221
  8. Werner Kühlbrandt

    Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Werner Kühlbrandt, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2013-4810

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Open-access funding)

  • Janet Vonck
  • Werner Kühlbrandt

European Commission (Archaellum Project ID: 311523)

  • Paushali Chaudhury
  • Sonja V Albers

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Edward H Egelman, University of Virginia, United States

Version history

  1. Received: April 6, 2017
  2. Accepted: June 26, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 27, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: June 29, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: June 29, 2017 (version 3)
  6. Version of Record published: July 19, 2017 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2017, Daum et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,677
    views
  • 844
    downloads
  • 67
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bertram Daum
  2. Janet Vonck
  3. Annett Bellack
  4. Paushali Chaudhury
  5. Robert Reichelt
  6. Sonja V Albers
  7. Reinhard Rachel
  8. Werner Kühlbrandt
(2017)
Structure and in situ organisation of the Pyrococcus furiosus archaellum machinery
eLife 6:e27470.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27470

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27470

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Damien M Rasmussen, Manny M Semonis ... Nicholas M Levinson
    Research Article

    The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Nicholas James Ose, Paul Campitelli ... Sefika Banu Ozkan
    Research Article

    We integrate evolutionary predictions based on the neutral theory of molecular evolution with protein dynamics to generate mechanistic insight into the molecular adaptations of the SARS-COV-2 spike (S) protein. With this approach, we first identified candidate adaptive polymorphisms (CAPs) of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and assessed the impact of these CAPs through dynamics analysis. Not only have we found that CAPs frequently overlap with well-known functional sites, but also, using several different dynamics-based metrics, we reveal the critical allosteric interplay between SARS-CoV-2 CAPs and the S protein binding sites with the human ACE2 (hACE2) protein. CAPs interact far differently with the hACE2 binding site residues in the open conformation of the S protein compared to the closed form. In particular, the CAP sites control the dynamics of binding residues in the open state, suggesting an allosteric control of hACE2 binding. We also explored the characteristic mutations of different SARS-CoV-2 strains to find dynamic hallmarks and potential effects of future mutations. Our analyses reveal that Delta strain-specific variants have non-additive (i.e., epistatic) interactions with CAP sites, whereas the less pathogenic Omicron strains have mostly additive mutations. Finally, our dynamics-based analysis suggests that the novel mutations observed in the Omicron strain epistatically interact with the CAP sites to help escape antibody binding.