Stochastic variation in the initial phase of bacterial infection predicts the probability of survival in D. melanogaster

  1. David Duneau  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jean-Baptiste Ferdy
  3. Jonathan Revah
  4. Hannah Kondolf
  5. Gerardo A Ortiz
  6. Brian P Lazzaro
  7. Nicolas Buchon  Is a corresponding author
  1. Cornell University, United States
  2. University of Toulouse 3, France

Abstract

A central problem in infection biology is understanding why two individuals exposed to identical infections have different outcomes. We have developed an experimental model where genetically identical, co-housed Drosophila given identical systemic infections experience different outcomes, with some individuals succumbing to acute infection while others control the pathogen as an asymptomatic persistent infection. We found that differences in bacterial burden at the time of death did not explain the two outcomes of infection. Inter-individual variation in survival stems from variation in within-host bacterial growth, which is determined by the immune response. We developed a model that captures bacterial growth dynamics and identifies key factors that predict the infection outcome: the rate of bacterial proliferation and the time required for the host to establish an effective immunological control. Our results provide a framework for studying the individual host-pathogen parameters governing the progression of infection and lead ultimately to life or death.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David Duneau

    Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    For correspondence
    david.duneau@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8323-1511
  2. Jean-Baptiste Ferdy

    Laboratoire Évolution and Diversité Biologique, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jonathan Revah

    Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hannah Kondolf

    Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gerardo A Ortiz

    Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Brian P Lazzaro

    Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Nicolas Buchon

    Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    For correspondence
    nicolas.buchon@cornell.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Science Foundation (1354421)

  • Nicolas Buchon

National Institutes of Health (RO1 AI083932)

  • Brian P Lazzaro

New York State Department of Health (Empire state stem cell fund C029542)

  • Nicolas Buchon

Swiss National Foundation (Fellowship from P300P3_147874)

  • David Duneau

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French Laboratory of Excellence ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02)

  • David Duneau

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French Laboratory of Excellence project ANR-10-LABX-41)

  • David Duneau

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Bruno Lemaître, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland

Version history

  1. Received: May 2, 2017
  2. Accepted: October 11, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 12, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 27, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Duneau et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,813
    views
  • 855
    downloads
  • 119
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. David Duneau
  2. Jean-Baptiste Ferdy
  3. Jonathan Revah
  4. Hannah Kondolf
  5. Gerardo A Ortiz
  6. Brian P Lazzaro
  7. Nicolas Buchon
(2017)
Stochastic variation in the initial phase of bacterial infection predicts the probability of survival in D. melanogaster
eLife 6:e28298.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28298

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28298

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Clara Akpan
    Insight

    Systematically tracking and analysing reproductive loss in livestock helps with efforts to safeguard the health and productivity of food animals by identifying causes and high-risk areas.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Hina Khan, Partha Paul ... Dibyendu Sarkar
    Research Article

    Survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis within the host macrophages requires the bacterial virulence regulator PhoP, but the underlying reason remains unknown. 3′,5′-Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is one of the most widely used second messengers, which impacts a wide range of cellular responses in microbial pathogens including M. tuberculosis. Herein, we hypothesized that intra-bacterial cAMP level could be controlled by PhoP since this major regulator plays a key role in bacterial responses against numerous stress conditions. A transcriptomic analysis reveals that PhoP functions as a repressor of cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE) Rv0805, which hydrolyzes cAMP. In keeping with these results, we find specific recruitment of the regulator within the promoter region of rv0805 PDE, and absence of phoP or ectopic expression of rv0805 independently accounts for elevated PDE synthesis, leading to the depletion of intra-bacterial cAMP level. Thus, genetic manipulation to inactivate PhoP-rv0805-cAMP pathway decreases cAMP level, stress tolerance, and intracellular survival of the bacillus.