Abstract

Neurons in sensory cortex are tuned to diverse features in natural scenes. But what determines which features neurons become selective to? Here we explore the idea that neuronal selectivity is optimised to represent features in the recent sensory past that best predict immediate future inputs. We tested this hypothesis using simple feedforward neural networks, which were trained to predict the next few video or audio frames in clips of natural scenes. The networks developed receptive fields that closely matched those of real cortical neurons in different mammalian species, including the oriented spatial tuning of primary visual cortex, the frequency selectivity of primary auditory cortex and, most notably, their temporal tuning properties. Furthermore, the better a network predicted future inputs the more closely its receptive fields resembled those in the brain. This suggests that sensory processing is optimised to extract those features with the most capacity to predict future input.

Data availability

All custom code used in this study was implemented in MATLAB and Python. We have uploaded the code to a public Github repository. The raw auditory experimental data is available at  https://osf.io/ayw2p/. The movies and sounds used for training the models are all publicly available at the websites detailed in the Methods.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Jan Schnupp
    (2016) NetworkReceptiveFields
    Available at the Open Science Framework.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yosef Singer

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Yayoi Teramoto

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3419-0351
  3. Ben DB Willmore

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Andrew J King

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Andrew J King, Senior Editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5180-7179
  5. Jan W H Schnupp

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Nicol S Harper

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    nicol.harper@dpag.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7851-4840

Funding

Clarendon Fund

  • Yosef Singer
  • Yayoi Teramoto

University Of Oxford

  • Nicol S Harper

Action on Hearing Loss (PA07)

  • Nicol S Harper

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/H008608/1)

  • Nicol S Harper

Wellcome (WT10525/Z/14/Z)

  • Yayoi Teramoto

Wellcome (WT076508AIA)

  • Ben DB Willmore

Wellcome (WT108369/Z/2015/Z)

  • Ben DB Willmore

Wellcome (WT076508AIA)

  • Andrew J King

Wellcome (WT108369/Z/2015/Z)

  • Andrew J King

Wellcome (WT082692)

  • Nicol S Harper

Wellcome (WT076508AIA)

  • Nicol S Harper

Wellcome (WT108369/Z/2015/Z)

  • Nicol S Harper

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jack L Gallant, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Auditory RFs of neurons were recorded in the primary auditory cortex (A1) and anterior auditory field (AAF) of 5 pigmented ferrets of both sexes (all > 6 months of age) and used as a basis for comparison with the RFs of model units trained on auditory stimuli. These recordings were performed under license from the UK Home Office and were approved by the University of Oxford Committee on Animal Care and Ethical Review. Full details of the recording methods are described in earlier studies [45,90]. Briefly, we induced general anaesthesia with a single intramuscular dose of medetomidine (0.022 mg · kg−1 · h−1) and ketamine (5 mg · kg−1 · h−1), which was then maintained with a continuous intravenous infusion of medetomidine and ketamine in saline. Oxygen was supplemented with a ventilator, and we monitored vital signs (body temperature, end-tidal CO2, and the electrocardiogram) throughout the experiment. The temporal muscles were retracted, a head holder was secured to the skull surface, and a craniotomy and a durotomy were made over the auditory cortex. Extracellular recordings were made using silicon probe electrodes (Neuronexus Technologies) and acoustic stimuli were presented via Panasonic RPHV27 earphones, which were coupled to otoscope specula that were inserted into each ear canal, and driven by Tucker-Davis Technologies System III hardware (48 kHz sample rate).

Version history

  1. Received: October 4, 2017
  2. Accepted: June 16, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 18, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: June 22, 2018 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: August 24, 2018 (version 3)
  6. Version of Record updated: September 18, 2018 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2018, Singer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,612
    views
  • 1,123
    downloads
  • 52
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yosef Singer
  2. Yayoi Teramoto
  3. Ben DB Willmore
  4. Andrew J King
  5. Jan W H Schnupp
  6. Nicol S Harper
(2018)
Sensory cortex is optimised for prediction of future input
eLife 7:e31557.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31557

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31557

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Salima Messaoudi, Ada Allam ... Isabelle Caille
    Research Article

    The fragile X syndrome (FXS) represents the most prevalent form of inherited intellectual disability and is the first monogenic cause of autism spectrum disorder. FXS results from the absence of the RNA-binding protein FMRP (fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein). Neuronal migration is an essential step of brain development allowing displacement of neurons from their germinal niches to their final integration site. The precise role of FMRP in neuronal migration remains largely unexplored. Using live imaging of postnatal rostral migratory stream (RMS) neurons in Fmr1-null mice, we observed that the absence of FMRP leads to delayed neuronal migration and altered trajectory, associated with defects of centrosomal movement. RNA-interference-induced knockdown of Fmr1 shows that these migratory defects are cell-autonomous. Notably, the primary Fmrp mRNA target implicated in these migratory defects is microtubule-associated protein 1B (MAP1B). Knocking down MAP1B expression effectively rescued most of the observed migratory defects. Finally, we elucidate the molecular mechanisms at play by demonstrating that the absence of FMRP induces defects in the cage of microtubules surrounding the nucleus of migrating neurons, which is rescued by MAP1B knockdown. Our findings reveal a novel neurodevelopmental role for FMRP in collaboration with MAP1B, jointly orchestrating neuronal migration by influencing the microtubular cytoskeleton.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.