Stage-dependent remodeling of projections to motor cortex in ALS mouse model revealed by a new variant retrograde-AAV9

  1. Barbara Commisso
  2. Lingjun Ding
  3. Karl Varadi
  4. Martin Gorges
  5. David Bayer
  6. Tobias M Boeckers
  7. Albert C Ludolph
  8. Jan Kassubek
  9. Oliver Mueller
  10. Francesco Roselli  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Ulm, Germany
  2. University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
  3. University of Kiel, Germany

Abstract

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is characterized by the progressive degeneration of motoneurons in the primary motor cortex (pMO) and in spinal cord. However, the pathogenic process involves multiple subnetworks in the brain and functional MRI studies demonstrate an increase in functional connectivity in areas connected to pMO despite the ongoing neurodegeneration. The extent and the structural basis of the motor subnetwork remodelling in experimentally-tractable models remain unclear. We have developed a new retrograde AAV9 to quantitatively map the projections to pMO in the SOD1(G93A) ALS mouse model. We show an increase in the number of neurons projecting from somatosensory cortex to pMO at presymptomatic stages, followed by an increase in projections from thalamus, auditory cortex and contralateral MO (inputs from 20 other structures remains unchanged) as disease advances. The stage- and structure-dependent remodeling of projection to pMO in ALS may provide insights into the hyperconnectivity observed in ALS patients.

Data availability

All the murine data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. The raw images are deposited on the Dataverse database (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5VNSXE)

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Barbara Commisso

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lingjun Ding

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Karl Varadi

    Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Martin Gorges

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David Bayer

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tobias M Boeckers

    Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Albert C Ludolph

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jan Kassubek

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Oliver Mueller

    Dept. of Internal Medicine III, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Francesco Roselli

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    For correspondence
    francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9935-6899

Funding

Baustein program-Ulm University Medical Faculty

  • Francesco Roselli

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GRK1789)

  • David Bayer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Moritz Helmstaedter, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Germany

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments have been approved by the Regierungpraesidium Tubingen under the licence no. 1312. All animals were handled according to the federal regulations on animal experimentations and under the supervision of the local veterinary office. Every effort was made to adhere to the 3R guidelines and to minimize suffering.

Human subjects: All subjects included in the human study provided written informed consent according to institutional guidelines; the consent includes the declaration of the understanding of the study design, the agreement to the participation to the study, to the publication of the results, and to the data protection and anonymization procedures (under the chaptes Einwilligungserklaerung"", ""Probandeninformation"", ""Darstellung der Experimente"", ""Datenschutzerklärung""). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ulm University, Ulm, Germany (reference #19/12) and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Version history

  1. Received: March 23, 2018
  2. Accepted: August 21, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 23, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 5, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Commisso et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,591
    views
  • 439
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Barbara Commisso
  2. Lingjun Ding
  3. Karl Varadi
  4. Martin Gorges
  5. David Bayer
  6. Tobias M Boeckers
  7. Albert C Ludolph
  8. Jan Kassubek
  9. Oliver Mueller
  10. Francesco Roselli
(2018)
Stage-dependent remodeling of projections to motor cortex in ALS mouse model revealed by a new variant retrograde-AAV9
eLife 7:e36892.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36892

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36892

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Kenta Abe, Yuki Kambe ... Tatsuo Sato
    Research Article

    Midbrain dopamine neurons impact neural processing in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) through mesocortical projections. However, the signals conveyed by dopamine projections to the PFC remain unclear, particularly at the single-axon level. Here, we investigated dopaminergic axonal activity in the medial PFC (mPFC) during reward and aversive processing. By optimizing microprism-mediated two-photon calcium imaging of dopamine axon terminals, we found diverse activity in dopamine axons responsive to both reward and aversive stimuli. Some axons exhibited a preference for reward, while others favored aversive stimuli, and there was a strong bias for the latter at the population level. Long-term longitudinal imaging revealed that the preference was maintained in reward- and aversive-preferring axons throughout classical conditioning in which rewarding and aversive stimuli were paired with preceding auditory cues. However, as mice learned to discriminate reward or aversive cues, a cue activity preference gradually developed only in aversive-preferring axons. We inferred the trial-by-trial cue discrimination based on machine learning using anticipatory licking or facial expressions, and found that successful discrimination was accompanied by sharper selectivity for the aversive cue in aversive-preferring axons. Our findings indicate that a group of mesocortical dopamine axons encodes aversive-related signals, which are modulated by both classical conditioning across days and trial-by-trial discrimination within a day.

    1. Neuroscience
    Baiwei Liu, Zampeta-Sofia Alexopoulou, Freek van Ede
    Research Article

    Working memory enables us to bridge past sensory information to upcoming future behaviour. Accordingly, by its very nature, working memory is concerned with two components: the past and the future. Yet, in conventional laboratory tasks, these two components are often conflated, such as when sensory information in working memory is encoded and tested at the same location. We developed a task in which we dissociated the past (encoded location) and future (to-be-tested location) attributes of visual contents in working memory. This enabled us to independently track the utilisation of past and future memory attributes through gaze, as observed during mnemonic selection. Our results reveal the joint consideration of past and future locations. This was prevalent even at the single-trial level of individual saccades that were jointly biased to the past and future. This uncovers the rich nature of working memory representations, whereby both past and future memory attributes are retained and can be accessed together when memory contents become relevant for behaviour.