Genetic analysis reveals functions of atypical polyubiquitin chains

  1. Fernando Meza Gutierrez
  2. Deniz Simsek
  3. Arda Mizrak
  4. Adam Deutschbauer
  5. Hannes Braberg
  6. Jeffrey Johnson
  7. Jiewei Xu
  8. Michael Shales
  9. Michelle Nguyen
  10. Raquel Tamse-Kuehn
  11. Curt Palm
  12. Lars M Steinmetz
  13. Nevan J Krogan
  14. David P Toczyski  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  2. Amgen Research, United States
  3. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, United States
  4. Stanford University, United States
  5. University of California San Francisco, United States

Abstract

Although polyubiquitin chains linked through all lysines of ubiquitin exist, specific functions are well-established only for lysine-48 and lysine-63 linkages in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To uncover pathways regulated by distinct linkages, genetic interactions between a gene deletion library and a panel of lysine-to-arginine ubiquitin mutants were systematically identified. The K11R mutant had strong genetic interactions with threonine biosynthetic genes. Consistently, we found that K11R mutants import threonine poorly. The K11R mutant also exhibited a strong genetic interaction with a subunit of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC), suggesting a role in cell cycle regulation. K11-linkages are important for vertebrate APC function, but this was not previously described in yeast. We show that the yeast APC also modifies substrates with K11-linkages in vitro, and that those chains contribute to normal APC-substrate turnover in vivo. This study reveals comprehensive genetic interactomes of polyubiquitin chains and characterizes the role of K11-chains in two biological pathways.

Data availability

All datasets generated are included as Supplementary Files 4 (SGA dataset) and 5 (quantitative proteomics).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Fernando Meza Gutierrez

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5601-7202
  2. Deniz Simsek

    Amgen Research, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    Deniz Simsek, is affiliated with Amgen Research. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  3. Arda Mizrak

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Adam Deutschbauer

    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Hannes Braberg

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Jeffrey Johnson

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Jiewei Xu

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Michael Shales

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Michelle Nguyen

    Stanford Genome Technology Center, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Raquel Tamse-Kuehn

    Stanford Genome Technology Center, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Curt Palm

    Stanford Genome Technology Center, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Lars M Steinmetz

    Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Nevan J Krogan

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. David P Toczyski

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    dpt4darwin@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5924-0365

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R35 GM118104)

  • David P Toczyski

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Michael Rape, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Version history

  1. Received: October 18, 2018
  2. Accepted: November 30, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 14, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 24, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Meza Gutierrez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,967
    views
  • 268
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Fernando Meza Gutierrez
  2. Deniz Simsek
  3. Arda Mizrak
  4. Adam Deutschbauer
  5. Hannes Braberg
  6. Jeffrey Johnson
  7. Jiewei Xu
  8. Michael Shales
  9. Michelle Nguyen
  10. Raquel Tamse-Kuehn
  11. Curt Palm
  12. Lars M Steinmetz
  13. Nevan J Krogan
  14. David P Toczyski
(2018)
Genetic analysis reveals functions of atypical polyubiquitin chains
eLife 7:e42955.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42955

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42955

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.