Decoupling sensory from decisional choice biases in perceptual decision making

  1. Daniel Linares  Is a corresponding author
  2. David Aguilar-Lleyda
  3. Joan López-Moliner
  1. Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Spain
  2. Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, France
  3. Universitat de Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

The contribution of sensory and decisional processes to perceptual decision making is still unclear, even in simple perceptual tasks. When decision makers need to select an action from a set of balanced alternatives, any tendency to choose one alternative more often—choice bias—is consistent with a bias in the sensory evidence, but also with a preference to select that alternative independently of the sensory evidence. To decouple sensory from decisional biases, here we asked humans to perform a simple perceptual discrimination task with two symmetric alternatives under two different task instructions. The instructions varied the response mapping between perception and the category of the alternatives. We found that from 32 participants, 30 exhibited sensory biases and 15 decisional biases. The decisional biases were consistent with a criterion change in a simple signal detection theory model. Perceptual decision making, thus, even in simple scenarios, is affected by sensory and decisional choice biases.

Data availability

The data and the code to do the statistical analysis and create the figures is available at https://github.com/danilinares/2018LinaresAguilarLopezmoliner

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Daniel Linares

    Theoretical Neurobiology of Cortical Circuits, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    danilinares@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7473-4184
  2. David Aguilar-Lleyda

    Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6963-4069
  3. Joan López-Moliner

    Department of Cognition, Development and Psychology of Education, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya (SLT002/16/00338)

  • Daniel Linares

Catalan Government (2017SGR-48)

  • Joan López-Moliner

Fudación Alicia Koplowitz

  • Daniel Linares

Project AEI/Feder, UE (PSI2017-83493R)

  • Joan López-Moliner

Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya (SLT006/17/00362)

  • Daniel Linares

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Maik C Stüttgen, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany

Ethics

Human subjects: The study was approved by the ethical committee of the University of Barcelona (IRB00003099) and followed the requirements of the Helsinki convention. The participants, who did not know the hypothesis of the experiments, provided written consent to perform the experiments.

Version history

  1. Received: November 28, 2018
  2. Accepted: March 23, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 27, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 11, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Linares et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,131
    views
  • 457
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Daniel Linares
  2. David Aguilar-Lleyda
  3. Joan López-Moliner
(2019)
Decoupling sensory from decisional choice biases in perceptual decision making
eLife 8:e43994.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43994

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43994

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ya-Hui Lin, Li-Wen Wang ... Li-An Chu
    Research Article

    Tissue-clearing and labeling techniques have revolutionized brain-wide imaging and analysis, yet their application to clinical formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks remains challenging. We introduce HIF-Clear, a novel method for efficiently clearing and labeling centimeter-thick FFPE specimens using elevated temperature and concentrated detergents. HIF-Clear with multi-round immunolabeling reveals neuron circuitry regulating multiple neurotransmitter systems in a whole FFPE mouse brain and is able to be used as the evaluation of disease treatment efficiency. HIF-Clear also supports expansion microscopy and can be performed on a non-sectioned 15-year-old FFPE specimen, as well as a 3-month formalin-fixed mouse brain. Thus, HIF-Clear represents a feasible approach for researching archived FFPE specimens for future neuroscientific and 3D neuropathological analyses.

    1. Neuroscience
    Amanda Chu, Nicholas T Gordon ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Article

    Pavlovian fear conditioning has been extensively used to study the behavioral and neural basis of defensive systems. In a typical procedure, a cue is paired with foot shock, and subsequent cue presentation elicits freezing, a behavior theoretically linked to predator detection. Studies have since shown a fear conditioned cue can elicit locomotion, a behavior that - in addition to jumping, and rearing - is theoretically linked to imminent or occurring predation. A criticism of studies observing fear conditioned cue-elicited locomotion is that responding is non-associative. We gave rats Pavlovian fear discrimination over a baseline of reward seeking. TTL-triggered cameras captured 5 behavior frames/s around cue presentation. Experiment 1 examined the emergence of danger-specific behaviors over fear acquisition. Experiment 2 examined the expression of danger-specific behaviors in fear extinction. In total, we scored 112,000 frames for nine discrete behavior categories. Temporal ethograms show that during acquisition, a fear conditioned cue suppresses reward seeking and elicits freezing, but also elicits locomotion, jumping, and rearing - all of which are maximal when foot shock is imminent. During extinction, a fear conditioned cue most prominently suppresses reward seeking, and elicits locomotion that is timed to shock delivery. The independent expression of these behaviors in both experiments reveal a fear conditioned cue to orchestrate a temporally organized suite of behaviors.