Myonuclear accretion is a determinant of exercise-induced remodeling in skeletal muscle

  1. Qingnian Goh
  2. Tajeong Song
  3. Michael J Petrany
  4. Alyssa AW Cramer
  5. Chengyi Sun
  6. Sakthivel Sadayappan
  7. Se-Jin Lee
  8. Douglas P Millay  Is a corresponding author
  1. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, United States
  2. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, United States
  3. The Jackson Laboratory, United States

Abstract

Skeletal muscle adapts to external stimuli such as increased work. Muscle progenitors (MPs) control muscle repair due to severe damage, but the role of MP fusion and associated myonuclear accretion during exercise are unclear. While we previously demonstrated that MP fusion is required for growth using a supra-physiological model (1), questions remained about the need for myonuclear accrual during muscle adaptation in a physiological setting. Here, we developed a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocol and assessed the importance of MP fusion. In 8 month-old mice, HIIT led to progressive myonuclear accretion throughout the protocol, and functional muscle hypertrophy. Abrogation of MP fusion at the onset of HIIT resulted in exercise intolerance and fibrosis. In contrast, ablation of MP fusion 4 weeks into HIIT, preserved exercise tolerance but attenuated hypertrophy. We conclude that myonuclear accretion is required for different facets of exercise-induced adaptive responses, impacting both muscle repair and hypertrophic growth.

Data availability

All data generated in this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Qingnian Goh

    Department of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Tajeong Song

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Health and Disease, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Michael J Petrany

    Depatment of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alyssa AW Cramer

    Department of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2997-5066
  5. Chengyi Sun

    Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8500-1878
  6. Sakthivel Sadayappan

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Health and Disease, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Se-Jin Lee

    The Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Douglas P Millay

    Depatment of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    For correspondence
    douglas.millay@cchmc.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5188-0720

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01AR068286)

  • Douglas P Millay

Pew Charitable Trusts

  • Douglas P Millay

National Institutes of Health (R01AG059605)

  • Douglas P Millay

National Institutes of Health (R01AR060636)

  • Se-Jin Lee

National Institutes of Health (R01HL130356)

  • Sakthivel Sadayappan

National Institutes of Health (R01HL105826)

  • Sakthivel Sadayappan

National Institutes of Health (R01AR067279)

  • Sakthivel Sadayappan

National Institutes of Health (RO1/R56HL139680)

  • Sakthivel Sadayappan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Andrew Brack, University of California, San Francisco, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols of the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

Version history

  1. Received: January 7, 2019
  2. Accepted: April 22, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 23, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 2, 2019 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: May 14, 2019 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2019, Goh et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,572
    views
  • 720
    downloads
  • 74
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Qingnian Goh
  2. Tajeong Song
  3. Michael J Petrany
  4. Alyssa AW Cramer
  5. Chengyi Sun
  6. Sakthivel Sadayappan
  7. Se-Jin Lee
  8. Douglas P Millay
(2019)
Myonuclear accretion is a determinant of exercise-induced remodeling in skeletal muscle
eLife 8:e44876.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44876

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44876

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Samuel C Griffiths, Jia Tan ... Hsin-Yi Henry Ho
    Research Article

    The receptor tyrosine kinase ROR2 mediates noncanonical WNT5A signaling to orchestrate tissue morphogenetic processes, and dysfunction of the pathway causes Robinow syndrome, Brachydactyly B and metastatic diseases. The domain(s) and mechanisms required for ROR2 function, however, remain unclear. We solved the crystal structure of the extracellular cysteine-rich (CRD) and Kringle (Kr) domains of ROR2 and found that, unlike other CRDs, the ROR2 CRD lacks the signature hydrophobic pocket that binds lipids/lipid-modified proteins, such as WNTs, suggesting a novel mechanism of ligand reception. Functionally, we showed that the ROR2 CRD, but not other domains, is required and minimally sufficient to promote WNT5A signaling, and Robinow mutations in the CRD and the adjacent Kr impair ROR2 secretion and function. Moreover, using function-activating and -perturbing antibodies against the Frizzled (FZ) family of WNT receptors, we demonstrate the involvement of FZ in WNT5A-ROR signaling. Thus, ROR2 acts via its CRD to potentiate the function of a receptor super-complex that includes FZ to transduce WNT5A signals.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Tobias Weinberger, Messerer Denise ... Christian Schulz
    Research Article

    Cardiac macrophages are heterogenous in phenotype and functions, which has been associated with differences in their ontogeny. Despite extensive research, our understanding of the precise role of different subsets of macrophages in ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury remains incomplete. We here investigated macrophage lineages and ablated tissue macrophages in homeostasis and after I/R injury in a CSF1R-dependent manner. Genomic deletion of a fms-intronic regulatory element (FIRE) in the Csf1r locus resulted in specific absence of resident homeostatic and antigen-presenting macrophages, without affecting the recruitment of monocyte-derived macrophages to the infarcted heart. Specific absence of homeostatic, monocyte-independent macrophages altered the immune cell crosstalk in response to injury and induced proinflammatory neutrophil polarization, resulting in impaired cardiac remodeling without influencing infarct size. In contrast, continuous CSF1R inhibition led to depletion of both resident and recruited macrophage populations. This augmented adverse remodeling after I/R and led to an increased infarct size and deterioration of cardiac function. In summary, resident macrophages orchestrate inflammatory responses improving cardiac remodeling, while recruited macrophages determine infarct size after I/R injury. These findings attribute distinct beneficial effects to different macrophage populations in the context of myocardial infarction.