Abstract

The Drosophila Fog pathway represents one of the best-understood signaling cascades controlling epithelial morphogenesis. During gastrulation, Fog induces apical cell constrictions that drive the invagination of mesoderm and posterior gut primordia. The cellular mechanisms underlying primordia internalization vary greatly among insects and recent work has suggested that Fog signaling is specific to the fast mode of gastrulation found in some flies. On the contrary, here we show in the beetle Tribolium, whose development is broadly representative for insects, that Fog has multiple morphogenetic functions. It modulates mesoderm internalization and controls a massive posterior infolding involved in gut and extraembryonic development. In addition, Fog signaling affects blastoderm cellularization, primordial germ cell positioning and cuboidal-to-squamous cell shape transitions in the extraembryonic serosa. Comparative analyses with two other distantly related insect species reveals that Fog's role during cellularisation is widely conserved and therefore might represent the ancestral function of the pathway.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. The Supplemental Material File 1 contains all primers used to amplify sequences for production of antisense RNA (ISH) and dsRNA (RNAi).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Matthew Alan Benton

    Institute for Zoology/Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7953-0765
  2. Nadine Frey

    Institute for Zoology/Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rodrigo Nunes da Fonseca

    Institute for Zoology/Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Cornelia von Levetzow

    Institute for Zoology/Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Dominik Stappert

    Institute for Zoology/Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Muhammad Salim Hakeemi

    Institute for Zoology/Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Kai H Conrads

    Institute for Zoology/Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Matthias Pechmann

    Institute for Zoology/Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0043-906X
  9. Kristen A Panfilio

    Institute for Zoology/Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6417-251X
  10. Jeremy A Lynch

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7625-657X
  11. Siegfried Roth

    Institute for Zoology/Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
    For correspondence
    siegfried.roth@uni-koeln.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5772-3558

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC 680)

  • Nadine Frey

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

  • Kai H Conrads

University of Cologne (Postdoctoral grant)

  • Matthias Pechmann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC 680)

  • Siegfried Roth

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG Research Fellowship 407643416)

  • Matthew Alan Benton

FAPERJ

  • Rodrigo Nunes da Fonseca

University of Cologne (International Graduate School in Genetics and Functional Genomics)

  • Rodrigo Nunes da Fonseca
  • Cornelia von Levetzow

CNPq

  • Rodrigo Nunes da Fonseca

CAPES

  • Rodrigo Nunes da Fonseca

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RU 1234)

  • Muhammad Salim Hakeemi

Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (PhD fellowship)

  • Dominik Stappert

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Emmy Noether Program PA 2044/1-1))

  • Kristen A Panfilio

National Institutes of Health (R03 HD078578)

  • Jeremy A Lynch

Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Postdoctoral Felloship)

  • Matthew Alan Benton

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. K VijayRaghavan, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India

Version history

  1. Received: April 2, 2019
  2. Accepted: September 30, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 1, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 15, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Benton et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,980
    views
  • 257
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Matthew Alan Benton
  2. Nadine Frey
  3. Rodrigo Nunes da Fonseca
  4. Cornelia von Levetzow
  5. Dominik Stappert
  6. Muhammad Salim Hakeemi
  7. Kai H Conrads
  8. Matthias Pechmann
  9. Kristen A Panfilio
  10. Jeremy A Lynch
  11. Siegfried Roth
(2019)
Fog signaling has diverse roles in epithelial morphogenesis in insects
eLife 8:e47346.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47346

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47346

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Ryan T Bell, Harutyun Sahakyan ... Eugene V Koonin
    Research Article

    A comprehensive census of McrBC systems, among the most common forms of prokaryotic Type IV restriction systems, followed by phylogenetic analysis, reveals their enormous abundance in diverse prokaryotes and a plethora of genomic associations. We focus on a previously uncharacterized branch, which we denote coiled-coil nuclease tandems (CoCoNuTs) for their salient features: the presence of extensive coiled-coil structures and tandem nucleases. The CoCoNuTs alone show extraordinary variety, with three distinct types and multiple subtypes. All CoCoNuTs contain domains predicted to interact with translation system components, such as OB-folds resembling the SmpB protein that binds bacterial transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), YTH-like domains that might recognize methylated tmRNA, tRNA, or rRNA, and RNA-binding Hsp70 chaperone homologs, along with RNases, such as HEPN domains, all suggesting that the CoCoNuTs target RNA. Many CoCoNuTs might additionally target DNA, via McrC nuclease homologs. Additional restriction systems, such as Type I RM, BREX, and Druantia Type III, are frequently encoded in the same predicted superoperons. In many of these superoperons, CoCoNuTs are likely regulated by cyclic nucleotides, possibly, RNA fragments with cyclic termini, that bind associated CARF (CRISPR-Associated Rossmann Fold) domains. We hypothesize that the CoCoNuTs, together with the ancillary restriction factors, employ an echeloned defense strategy analogous to that of Type III CRISPR-Cas systems, in which an immune response eliminating virus DNA and/or RNA is launched first, but then, if it fails, an abortive infection response leading to PCD/dormancy via host RNA cleavage takes over.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Daniel Thiel, Luis Alfonso Yañez Guerra ... Gáspár Jékely
    Research Article

    Neuropeptides are ancient signaling molecules in animals but only few peptide receptors are known outside bilaterians. Cnidarians possess a large number of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) – the most common receptors of bilaterian neuropeptides – but most of these remain orphan with no known ligands. We searched for neuropeptides in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis and created a library of 64 peptides derived from 33 precursors. In a large-scale pharmacological screen with these peptides and 161 N. vectensis GPCRs, we identified 31 receptors specifically activated by 1 to 3 of 14 peptides. Mapping GPCR and neuropeptide expression to single-cell sequencing data revealed how cnidarian tissues are extensively connected by multilayer peptidergic networks. Phylogenetic analysis identified no direct orthology to bilaterian peptidergic systems and supports the independent expansion of neuropeptide signaling in cnidarians from a few ancestral peptide-receptor pairs.