Postural control of arm and fingers through integration of movement commands
Abstract
Every movement ends in a period of stillness. Current models assume that commands that hold the limb at a target location do not depend on the commands that moved the limb to that location. Here, we report a surprising relationship between movement and posture in primates: on a within-trial basis, the commands that hold the arm and finger at a target location depend on the mathematical integration of the commands that moved the limb to that location. Following damage to the corticospinal tract, both the move and hold period commands become more variable. However, the hold period commands retain their dependence on the integral of the move period commands. Thus, our data suggest that the postural controller possesses a feedforward module that uses move commands to calculate a component of hold commands. This computation may arise within an unknown subcortical system that integrates cortical commands to stabilize limb posture.
Data availability
Source data files generated or analyzed during this study are included for Figures 1-7 and have also been deposited in OSF under accession code YC64A.
-
Postural control of arm and fingers through integration of movement commands.Open Science Framework, doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/YC64A.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS078311)
- Reza Shadmehr
Sheikh Khalifa Stroke Institute
- John W Krakauer
Medical Research Council (MR/K023012/1)
- Demetris S Soteropoulos
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1DP2NS083037)
- Mark M Churchland
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS100066)
- Mark M Churchland
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1U19NS104649)
- Mark M Churchland
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F31NS095706)
- Scott T Albert
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F32NS092350)
- Mark M Churchland
National Science Foundation (1723967)
- Reza Shadmehr
Simons Foundation (SCGB#542957)
- Mark M Churchland
Medical Research Council (MR/P023967)
- Stuart N Baker
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Kunlin Wei, Peking University, China
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All animal procedures in the U.S. were conducted in accord with the US National Institutes of Health guidelines and were approved by the Columbia University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (AC-AAAQ7409). These data were originally published in Lara, Cunningham, & Churchland (2018) as well as Lara, Elsayed, Zimnik, Cunningham, & Churchland (2018). All procedures in the U.K. were carried out under appropriate UK Home Office licenses in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, and were approved by the Local Research Ethics Committee of Newcastle University. These data were originally published in Soteropoulos, Williams, & Baker (2012).
Human subjects: Informed consent was obtained from all participants. All human subjects work was approved by the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Institutional Review Board, protocol number NA_00037510.
Version history
- Received: October 6, 2019
- Accepted: February 3, 2020
- Accepted Manuscript published: February 11, 2020 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: March 9, 2020 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2020, Albert et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,833
- views
-
- 604
- downloads
-
- 32
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Vesicles within presynaptic terminals are thought to be segregated into a variety of readily releasable and reserve pools. The nature of the pools and trafficking between them is not well understood, but pools that are slow to mobilize when synapses are active are often assumed to feed pools that are mobilized more quickly, in a series. However, electrophysiological studies of synaptic transmission have suggested instead a parallel organization where vesicles within slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools would separately feed independent reluctant- and fast-releasing subdivisions of the readily releasable pool. Here, we use FM-dyes to confirm the existence of multiple reserve pools at hippocampal synapses and a parallel organization that prevents intermixing between the pools, even when stimulation is intense enough to drive exocytosis at the maximum rate. The experiments additionally demonstrate extensive heterogeneity among synapses in the relative sizes of the slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools, which suggests equivalent heterogeneity in the numbers of reluctant and fast-releasing readily releasable vesicles that may be relevant for understanding information processing and storage.
-
- Evolutionary Biology
- Neuroscience
Neuropeptides are ancient signaling molecules in animals but only few peptide receptors are known outside bilaterians. Cnidarians possess a large number of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) – the most common receptors of bilaterian neuropeptides – but most of these remain orphan with no known ligands. We searched for neuropeptides in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis and created a library of 64 peptides derived from 33 precursors. In a large-scale pharmacological screen with these peptides and 161 N. vectensis GPCRs, we identified 31 receptors specifically activated by 1 to 3 of 14 peptides. Mapping GPCR and neuropeptide expression to single-cell sequencing data revealed how cnidarian tissues are extensively connected by multilayer peptidergic networks. Phylogenetic analysis identified no direct orthology to bilaterian peptidergic systems and supports the independent expansion of neuropeptide signaling in cnidarians from a few ancestral peptide-receptor pairs.