Combining magnetoencephalography with magnetic resonance imaging enhances learning of surrogate-biomarkers

Abstract

Electrophysiological methods, i.e., M/EEG provide unique views into brain health. Yet, when building predictive models from brain data, it is often unclear how electrophysiology should be combined with other neuroimaging methods. Information can be redundant, useful common representations of multimodal data may not be obvious and multimodal data collection can be medically contraindicated, which reduces applicability. Here, we propose a multimodal model to robustly combine MEG, MRI and fMRI for prediction. We focus on age prediction as a surrogate biomarker in 674 subjects from the Cam-CAN dataset. Strikingly, MEG, fMRI and MRI showed additive effects supporting distinct brain-behavior associations. Moreover, the contribution of MEG was best explained by cortical power spectra between 8 and 30 Hz. Finally, we demonstrate that the model preserves benefits of stacking when some data is missing. The proposed framework, hence, enables multimodal learning for a wide range of biomarkers from diverse types of brain signals.

Data availability

We used the publicly available Cam-CAN dataset. All software and code necessary to obtain the derivative data is shared on github: https://github.com/dengemann/meg-mri-surrogate-biomarkers-aging-2020

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Denis Alexander Engemann

    Parietal, Inria Saclay, Palaiseau, France
    For correspondence
    denis-alexander.engemann@inria.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7223-1014
  2. Oleh Kozynets

    Parietal, Inria Saclay, Palaiseau, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. David Sabbagh

    Parietal, Inria Saclay, Palaiseau, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Guillaume Lemaître

    Parietal, Inria Saclay, Palaiseau, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Gaël Varoquaux

    Parietal, Inria Saclay, Palaiseau, France
    Competing interests
    Gaël Varoquaux, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1076-5122
  6. Franziskus Liem

    Dynamics of Healthy Aging, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Alexandre Gramfort

    Parietal, Inria Saclay, Palaiseau, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (SLAB ERC-YStG-676943)

  • Alexandre Gramfort

French National Institute of Computer Science (Medecine Numerique)

  • Denis Alexander Engemann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Alexander Shackman, University of Maryland, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: This study is conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. No experiments on living beings were performed for this study. The data that we used was acquired by the Cam-CAN consortium and has been approved by the local ethics committee, Cambridgeshire 2 Research Ethics Committee (reference: 10/H0308/50).

Version history

  1. Received: November 29, 2019
  2. Accepted: May 9, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 19, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 22, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Engemann et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,000
    views
  • 545
    downloads
  • 68
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Denis Alexander Engemann
  2. Oleh Kozynets
  3. David Sabbagh
  4. Guillaume Lemaître
  5. Gaël Varoquaux
  6. Franziskus Liem
  7. Alexandre Gramfort
(2020)
Combining magnetoencephalography with magnetic resonance imaging enhances learning of surrogate-biomarkers
eLife 9:e54055.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54055

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54055

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Kenta Abe, Yuki Kambe ... Tatsuo Sato
    Research Article

    Midbrain dopamine neurons impact neural processing in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) through mesocortical projections. However, the signals conveyed by dopamine projections to the PFC remain unclear, particularly at the single-axon level. Here, we investigated dopaminergic axonal activity in the medial PFC (mPFC) during reward and aversive processing. By optimizing microprism-mediated two-photon calcium imaging of dopamine axon terminals, we found diverse activity in dopamine axons responsive to both reward and aversive stimuli. Some axons exhibited a preference for reward, while others favored aversive stimuli, and there was a strong bias for the latter at the population level. Long-term longitudinal imaging revealed that the preference was maintained in reward- and aversive-preferring axons throughout classical conditioning in which rewarding and aversive stimuli were paired with preceding auditory cues. However, as mice learned to discriminate reward or aversive cues, a cue activity preference gradually developed only in aversive-preferring axons. We inferred the trial-by-trial cue discrimination based on machine learning using anticipatory licking or facial expressions, and found that successful discrimination was accompanied by sharper selectivity for the aversive cue in aversive-preferring axons. Our findings indicate that a group of mesocortical dopamine axons encodes aversive-related signals, which are modulated by both classical conditioning across days and trial-by-trial discrimination within a day.

    1. Neuroscience
    Baiwei Liu, Zampeta-Sofia Alexopoulou, Freek van Ede
    Research Article

    Working memory enables us to bridge past sensory information to upcoming future behaviour. Accordingly, by its very nature, working memory is concerned with two components: the past and the future. Yet, in conventional laboratory tasks, these two components are often conflated, such as when sensory information in working memory is encoded and tested at the same location. We developed a task in which we dissociated the past (encoded location) and future (to-be-tested location) attributes of visual contents in working memory. This enabled us to independently track the utilisation of past and future memory attributes through gaze, as observed during mnemonic selection. Our results reveal the joint consideration of past and future locations. This was prevalent even at the single-trial level of individual saccades that were jointly biased to the past and future. This uncovers the rich nature of working memory representations, whereby both past and future memory attributes are retained and can be accessed together when memory contents become relevant for behaviour.