Synergy between SIRT1 and SIRT6 helps recognize DNA breaks and potentiates the DNA damage response and repair in humans and mice

  1. Fanbiao Meng
  2. Minxian Qian
  3. Bin Peng
  4. Linyuan Peng
  5. Xiaohui Wang
  6. Kang Zheng
  7. Zuojun Liu
  8. Xiaolong Tang
  9. Shuju Zhang
  10. Shimin Sun
  11. Xinyue Cao
  12. Qiuxiang Pang
  13. Bosheng Zhao
  14. Wenbin Ma
  15. Zhou Songyang
  16. Bo Xu
  17. Wei-Guo Zhu
  18. Xingzhi Xu  Is a corresponding author
  19. Baohua Liu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Shenzhen University Health Science Center, China
  2. Shandong University of Technology, China
  3. Sun Yat-sen University, China
  4. Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, China

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) is a highly orchestrated process but how double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) are initially recognized is unclear. Here, we show that polymerized SIRT6 deacetylase recognizes DSBs and potentiates the DDR in human and mouse cells. First, SIRT1 deacetylates SIRT6 at residue K33, which is important for SIRT6 polymerization and mobilization toward DSBs. Then, K33-deacetylated SIRT6 anchors to γH2AX, allowing its retention on and subsequent remodeling of local chromatin. We show that a K33R mutation that mimics hypoacetylated SIRT6 can rescue defective DNA repair as a result of SIRT1 deficiency in cultured cells. These data highlight the synergistic action between SIRTs in the spatiotemporal regulation of the DDR and DNA repair in humans and mice.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Fanbiao Meng

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Minxian Qian

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1763-2325
  3. Bin Peng

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Linyuan Peng

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Xiaohui Wang

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kang Zheng

    Anti-aging & Regenerative Medicine Research Institution, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6347-4241
  7. Zuojun Liu

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Xiaolong Tang

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4744-5846
  9. Shuju Zhang

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Shimin Sun

    Anti-aging & Regenerative Medicine Research Institution, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Xinyue Cao

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Qiuxiang Pang

    Anti-aging & Regenerative Medicine Research Institution, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Bosheng Zhao

    Anti-aging & Regenerative Medicine Research Institution, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Wenbin Ma

    Key Laboratory of Gene Engineering of the Ministry of Education and State Key Laboratory for Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Zhou Songyang

    Key Laboratory of Gene Engineering of the Ministry of Education and State Key Laboratory for Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Bo Xu

    Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Wei-Guo Zhu

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8385-6581
  18. Xingzhi Xu

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    For correspondence
    xingzhi.xu@szu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Baohua Liu

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    For correspondence
    ppliew@szu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1599-8059

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0503900)

  • Wei-Guo Zhu
  • Baohua Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (91849208,81972602,81702909,81871114,81601215)

  • Minxian Qian
  • Zuojun Liu
  • Xiaolong Tang
  • Xingzhi Xu
  • Baohua Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2015A030308007,2017B030301016)

  • Minxian Qian
  • Wei-Guo Zhu
  • Xingzhi Xu
  • Baohua Liu

Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (ZDSYS20190902093401689,KQJSCX20180328093403969,JCYJ20180507182044945)

  • Baohua Liu

Tianjin Municipal Science Foundation for Youths (18JCQNJC79800)

  • Fanbiao Meng

Youth Foundation of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (B1714)

  • Fanbiao Meng

National Natural Science Foundation of China (91949124)

  • Minxian Qian

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Matthew Simon, University of Rochester, United States

Version history

  1. Received: February 6, 2020
  2. Accepted: June 13, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 15, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 29, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Meng et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,989
    views
  • 494
    downloads
  • 50
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Fanbiao Meng
  2. Minxian Qian
  3. Bin Peng
  4. Linyuan Peng
  5. Xiaohui Wang
  6. Kang Zheng
  7. Zuojun Liu
  8. Xiaolong Tang
  9. Shuju Zhang
  10. Shimin Sun
  11. Xinyue Cao
  12. Qiuxiang Pang
  13. Bosheng Zhao
  14. Wenbin Ma
  15. Zhou Songyang
  16. Bo Xu
  17. Wei-Guo Zhu
  18. Xingzhi Xu
  19. Baohua Liu
(2020)
Synergy between SIRT1 and SIRT6 helps recognize DNA breaks and potentiates the DNA damage response and repair in humans and mice
eLife 9:e55828.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55828

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55828

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article Updated

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven cell motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high-MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.